Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 477 - 477
1 Nov 2011
Sandiford N Weitzel S
Full Access

Introduction: Arthroscopic management of posterior ankle impingement syndrome (PAIS) is now commonly practiced. Scanty information about the results of this procedure in a district hospitals is available.

Aim: We present the results of our series of patients treated with hindfoot arthroscopy for PAIS, and describe the complications encountered.

Patients and Method: Twenty procedures were performed on 19 patients (12 males, 7 females) between January 2006 and September 2008. Patients were followed up for an average of 7.9 months. Return to sport, patient satisfaction, relief of symptoms and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hind-foot score were all assessed.

Results: Procedures performed included excision of an os trigonum, flexor hallucis longus decompression, and microfracture of the posterior talus. The average age of the patients was 35 years. Return to activity occurred at an average of 4 weeks. Four patients were dissatisfied, 1 was unsure and all the other patients were satisfied with their outcome. The average pre-operative AOFAS score was 73.8 and the post operative score was 84.5. There were no neurovascular injuries.

Conclusion: There was a significant incidence of dissatisfied patients in the absence of major complications. This might reflect technical difficulties early in the early learning curve for this procedure.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 117 - 117
1 Mar 2006
Lee R Weitzel S Pringle J Higgs D Monsell F Briggs T Cannon S
Full Access

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that definitive surgery (extraperiosteal excision) is required in patients with osteofibrous dysplasia (OFD) due to the risk of recurrence and co-existent adamantinoma

OFD is an unusual childhood condition, which almost exclusively affects the tibia. It is thought to follow a slowly progressive course and to stabilise after skeletal maturity. The possible link with adamantinoma is controversial with some authors believing that they are part of one histological process. This therefore provides difficulty in recommending treatment options

A retrospective review of OFD was conducted. Using the Stanmore Bone Tumour Unit database 22 cases were identified who were initially diagnosed with OFD or were diagnosed on final histology. All cases were tibial except one lesion in the ulna and one in the fibula

Management was diverse depending on the severity of symptoms and the extent of the lesions encountered. Definitive (extraperiosteal) surgery in the majority of our patients was localized excision for small lesions (less than 50% of the bony circumference) and segmental excision followed by reconstructive surgery for more extensive ones. Seven patients had a sharkbite excision and a further seven were treated with fibula autografting. Of the latter group, one required further excision and bone transport due to recurrence of OFD. An additional five underwent bone transport & distraction osteogenesis using the Ilizarov technique and one had a proximal tibial replacement. Nine initially underwent curettage, but eight recurred (recurrence rate 88.9%). No recurrences occurred following localized extraperiosteal excisions and bone transport. There were three confirmed cases of adamantinoma.

In view of the risk of association of OFD with adamantinoma, and to some extent the continuous morbidity of OFD if left untreated, we believe that radical extraperiosteal excision is indicated in most if not all cases of OFD


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 396 - 396
1 Sep 2005
Lee RS Weitzel S Pringle J Higgs D Monsell F Briggs T Cannon S
Full Access

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that definitive surgery (extraperiosteal excision) is required in patients with osteofibrous dysplasia (OFD) due to the risk of recurrence and co-existent adamantinoma. The possible link with adamantinoma is controversial with some authors believing that they are part of one histological process. This therefore provides difficulty in recommending treatment options.

Methods: Using our database 22 cases of OFD were identified. Management was diverse.

Results: Definitive (extraperiosteal) surgery, in the majority of our patients, was localized excision for small lesions (less than 50% of the bony circumference) and segmental excision followed by reconstructive surgery for more extensive ones. Seven patients had a “shark-bite” excision and a further seven were treated with fibula autografting. Of the latter group, one required further excision and bone transport due to recurrence of OFD. Five underwent bone transport & distraction osteogenesis and one had a proximal tibial replacement. Nine initially underwent curettage, but eight recurred. No recurrences occurred following localized extraperiosteal excisions and bone transport. There were three confirmed cases of adamantinoma.

Discussion: In view of the risk of association of OFD with adamantinoma, and to some extent the continuous morbidity of OFD if left untreated, we believe that radical extraperiosteal excision is indicated in most if not all cases of OFD.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 87-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 322 - 322
1 Sep 2005
Lee R Weitzel S Pringle J Higgs D Monsell F Briggs T Cannon S
Full Access

Introduction and Aim: The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that definitive surgery (extraperiosteal excision) is required in patients with osteofibrous dysplasia (OFD) due to the risk of recurrence and co-existent adamantinoma. OFD is an unusual childhood condition, which almost exclusively affects the tibia. It is thought to follow a slowly progressive course and to stabilise after skeletal maturity. The possible link with adamantinoma is controversial, with some authors believing that they are part of one histological process. This therefore provides difficulty in recommending treatment options.

Method and Results: A retrospective review of OFD was conducted. Using the Stanmore Bone Tumor Unit database, 22 cases were identified who were initially diagnosed with OFD or were diagnosed on final histology. All cases were tibial except one lesion in the ulna and one in the fibula. Management was diverse, depending on the severity of symptoms and the extent of the lesions encountered. Definitive (extraperiosteal) surgery in the majority of our patients was localised excision for small lesions (less than 50% of the bony circumference) and segmental excision followed by reconstructive surgery for more extensive ones. Seven patients had a ‘sharkbite’ excision and a further seven were treated with fibula autografting. Of the latter group, one required further excision and bone transport due to recurrence of OFD. An additional five underwent bone transport and distraction osteogenesis using the Ilizarov technique and one had a proximal tibial replacement. Nine initially underwent curettage, but eight recurred (recurrence rate 88.9%). No recurrences occurred following localised extraperiosteal excisions and bone transport. There were three confirmed cases of adamantinoma

Conclusion: In view of the risk of association of OFD with adamantinoma, and to some extent the continuous morbidity of OFD if left untreated, we believe that radical extraperiosteal excision is indicated in most if not all cases of OFD