INTRODUCTION: The authors present the results of a surgical technique for lateral ankle chronic instability, derived from Castaing and Duquennoy procedures. It uses a half peroneus brevis with a tightening of the antero- lateral capsule. A Plasty with the extensorum digitorum brevis was used in the event of associated subtalar instability.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2001 and 2005, 38 cases of ligamentoplasties have been performed for chronic instability of the ankle. 32 (25 men and 7 women) of them have been reviewed with a mean delay of 26 months (extremes of 10 months to 5 years). They were middle-aged of 28,5 years. All the patients have been reviewed with stress X-Ray in varus of the both ankles (measure of tibio talar angle, arthritis) and had a strength measure in eversion by the same examiner. The functional evaluation was performed with Molander and Olerud ankle score.

RESULTS: There were 20% of complications, especially cutaneous cicatrisation problems and algodystrophy. After surgery, no patient had instability; only one, had apprehension of the ankle. 90 % retrieved the same sport with the same level. No body changed of job. 3 patients were disappointed because of pain in sports and stiffness. At revision, the functional score was 90 against 59 at the pre operative time. The difference of strength in eversion between the two ankles was about 7%. Laxity had a good correction seeing the average tibio talar angle between the both ankle is 0,5°.

DISCUSSION: The results of this procedure show a distinct improvement of stability, radiological laxity and functional activity. The arthrotomy performed in Duquennoy procedure, is useful for diagnosis and treatment. It shows the cartilage and allows the removal of impingement and foreign bodies. A plasty that uses the single evertor deprives the ankle of a part of active and proprioceptive control. However, the patients didn’t feel a difference or a discomfort. The patients who had the surgery on the jump foot side had no significative difference of strength in eversion between the both ankles.

CONCLUSION: This anatomical procedure gives 91% of satisfaction, for these active young people. The postoperative physiotherapy allows the complete recovery of activities from the sixth month after surgery.

Purpose: We report the satisfactory results obtained in a retrospecive multicentric series of 80 shoulder prostheses implanted for aseptic osetonecrosis of the head of the humerus.

Material and methods: Seventy-four patients (43 men, 31 women, men age 59 years) with aseptic osteonecrosis of the head of the humerus treated with a shoulder prosthesis were reviewed at least two years after surgery. The mean weighted score before surgery was 37%. Twenty-six total prostheses and 54 humeral prostheses were implanted via the deltopectoral approach. There had been few complications at review: seven stiff shoulders, one torn suture of the subscapularis with instability, two inflammatory glenoids, one migration. Physical exam and x-ray (ossifications, lucent lines) findings were recorded.

Results: Mean follow-up was 47 months (24–104 months). The Constant score was improved significantly (p < 0.05). The total weighed score was 88% on the average and was not affected by gender, side, or dominant side. Ninety percent of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied. Gain in motion was significant in all movements with a mean 53° for active anterior elevation. For grade V shoulders, the improvement was significantly better with total shoulder arthroplasty while for grade II and III shoulders a humeral prosthesis was preferable. Full thickness tears of the rotator tendons did not influence overall outcome despite less recovery of motion (p < 0.05) and force (p = 0.09). Complications did not alter results.

Discussion: A humeral prosthesis should be preferred for grade II–III shoulders and a total shoulder arthroplasty for major degeneration of the glenoid (grade V). For grade IV, either prosthesis may be used depending on the patient’s age, activity level, and status of the rotator cuff. For very young or very old patients, high levels of physical activity may argue against prosthesis implantation due to the risk of loosening or rotator cuff tears which are unfavourable factors.

Conclusion: The results of this multicentric series corroborate data in the literature that shoulder arthroplasty provides good results for the treatment of aseptic necrosis of the head of the humerus. In generally, arthroplasty allows pain relief, good motion, particularly for external rotation, and good force recovery, explaining the better results obtained in active younger subjects.

Purpose: The indication for humeral or total shoulder prosthesis in patients with avascular osteonecrosis of the shoulder depends on the radiographic stage of the necrosis. The purpose of this study was to analyse the prognostic radiographic features enabling proper identification of the indications for humeral or total prostheses.

Material and methods: This retrospective multicentric study included 53 shoulders operated on for prosthetic repair of avascular osteonecrosis. There were 20 men and 29 women, mean age 57 years. A humeral prosthesis was used in 34 cases and a total prosthesis in 19. Clinical assessment was based on the Constant score and the radiographic analysis used the Arlet and Ficat classification. Staging was II (n=4), III (n=16), IV (n=21) and V (n=12). Independently of the radiographic stage of necrosis, three characteristic groups were defined. Group 1 (19 shoulders) included necrosis without bony collapse of the humeral head. Group 2 (20 shoulders) included necrosis with bony collapse of the humeral head with preservation of the anatomic relations with the glenoid cavity. Group 3 (14 shoulders) included necrosis with bony collapse and impaction of the humeral head in the glenoid with medialisation of the humerus.

Results: Preoperatively, presence of bony collapse was associated with decreased pain and motion score. Major joint stiffness was noted in group 3 (8). The humeral prosthesis gave similar results for groups 1 and 2 (Constant score 73 and 75.3). Less satisfactory results was the rule in group 3 (Constant score 51.6). There was a postoperative erosion of the glenoid cavity in 83% of the shoulders in group 3 versus 12.5% in group 1 and 17% in group 2. The total prosthesis optimised results despite persistence of a difference between groups 2 and 3 (Constant score 83 and 64 respectively).

Discussion: Destabilisation of the glenohumeral joint by impaction of the humeral head against the glenoid cavity has an effect on the clinical result of the prosthetic surgery. Preservation of the anatomic relations of the articulation (groups 1 and 2) appears to be necessary for good results. Impaction medialisation of the humerus has a negative effect on the clinical result of humeral prostheses with a risk of glenoid erosion.

Conclusion: Independently of radiographic stage of necrosis, the presence of humeral impaction with medi-alisation should be considered individually as it has a negative effect on the clinical outcome of these prostheses, particularly humeral prostheses.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyse the factors affecting outcome after prosthesis implantation for osteonecrosis of the humerus in order to ascertain details concerning the indications for humerus or total prostheses in this condition.

Material and methods: Forty-seven women and 27 men, mean age 57 years with osteonecrosis of the humerus underwent surgery for implantation of 80 shoulder prostheses. According to the Arlet and Ficat classification as modified by Cruess there were five grade II, fifteen grade III, 41 grade IV and fourteen grade V shoulders, with five unclassifiable shoulders. there were 14 supraspinatus tears and five infraspinatus tears. The 26 total shoulder prostheses and 54 humeral prostheses were reviewed at a mean 47 months follow-up. Pre-operative x-rays were available for 65 shoulders and postoperative x-rays for 58.

Results: The subjective outcome was considered good irrespective of the grade (very satisfied 60%, satisfied 30%, dissatisfied 4%). The mean postoperative Constant score was 70 ± 15. The preoperative score was lower for more advanced disease but the difference was not significant at postoperative assessment. The total prosthesis provided better results in grade V shoulders and the hemiprosthesis in grade II and III shoulders.

The result of the humeral prostheses depended on the grade of necrosis. The postoperative Constant score was lower for advanced necrosis with lower scores for motion, force and pain (which was not influenced by age). At last follow-up, 31% of the x-rays revealed a significant narrowing of the glenoid-head space. The clinical outcome was significantly less satisfactory for all Constant scores. Rotator cuff tears, preoperative stiffness favoured glenoid wear. Tears of both cuff tendons led to poor outcome. Bone collapse with impaction of the head into the glenoid and medialisation of the humerus was a significant factor predictive of less satisfactory outcome.

Discussion: The grade of necrosis is a determining factor for indications for humerus or total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of osteonecrosis. Our objective results lead us to recommend a humeral prosthesis for grade II and III patients and a total shoulder arthroplasty for grade V patients. For grade IV patients, the choice depends on patient age, shoulder stiffness, the status of the cuff, and most importantly, collapsus of the head of the humerus with impaction-medialisation of the humerus.