Introduction

Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is a common source of impaired motion of the hip, often attributed to the presence of an aspherical femoral head. However, other types of femoral deformity, including posterior slip, retroversion, and neck enlargement, can also limit hip motion. This study was performed to establish whether the “cam” impinging femur has a single deformity of the head/neck junction or multiple abnormalities.

Several studies have suggested that, in TKR, gender specific-prostheses are needed to accommodate anatomic differences between males and females. This study was performed to examine whether gender is a factor contributing to the variability of the size, shape and orientation of the patellofemoral sulcus.

3D computer models of the femur were reconstructed from CT scans of 20 male and 20 female femora. The patellofemoral groove was quantified by measuring landmarks at 10 degree increments around the epicondylar axis. The orientation of the groove was defined by the tracking path generated by a sphere moving from the top of the groove to the intercondylar notch. To assess the influence of gender on the shape of the distal femur, all morphologic parameters were normalized for differences in bone size.

Overall, the distal femur was 15% larger in males compared to females. The male condyles were 4% wider than the female for constant AP depth (p=0.13). When normalized for bone size, there was no gender difference in most patello-femoral dimensions, including the length, width, angle or tilt of the sulcus. Female femora had a less prominent medial anterior ridge (p=0.07), and a larger normalized radius of curvature of the tracking path (p=0.03). In addition, the orientation of the sulcus differed by 1–2 degrees in both the coronal and axial planes. Overall, gender explained 4.7% of the anatomic variation of the parameters examined, varying from 0 to 15.9%.

The size, shape and orientation of the patello-femoral groove are highly variable.

While the patello-femoral morphology of male and female femora are very similar, some of the anatomic variability is related to gender, particularly the prominence of the medial ridge and the sulcus radius of curvature. The biomechanical and clinical significance of these differences after TKA have yet to be determined.

Introduction: Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is a common source of impaired motion of the hip, often attributed to the presence of an aspherical femoral head and reduced concavity of the anterior head/neck junction. However, other types of femoral deformity, including posterior slip, retroversion, and neck enlargement, can also limit hip motion. This study was performed to establish whether the “cam” impinging femur is a unique entity with a single deformity of the head/neck junction or is part of a multi-component continuum of femoral dysmorphia.

Materials and Methods: Computer models of 71 femora (28 normal and 43 “cam” impinging) were prepared from CT scans. Morphologic parameters describing the shape and dimensions of the head, neck, and medullary canal were calculated for each specimen. The anteversion angle, alpha angle of Notzli, beta angle of Beaulé, and normalized anterior heads offset were also calculated. Average dimensions were compared between the normal and impinging femora. A dimensionless model of the femoral neck was also generated to determine whether there is an inherent difference in the shape of the femoral neck in cam impinging and normal femora, independent of any differences in specimen size.

Results: Compared to the normal controls, the impinging femora had wider necks (AP: 15.2 vs 13.3 mm, p< 0.0001), larger heads (diameter: 48.3mm vs 46.0mm, p=0.032) and decreased head/neck ratios (1.60 vs 1.74, p=0.0002). However, there was no difference in neck/shaft angle (125.7° vs 126.5°, p=0.582) or anteversion angle (8.70 vs 8.44°, p=0.866). Most significantly, 53% of impinging femora also had a significant posterior slip (> 2mm), compared to only 14% of normal controls. Average head displacements for the two groups were: FAI: 1.93mm vs Normals: 0.78mm (p< 0.0001). Shape indices derived from individual dimensionless models showed slight AP widening of the abnormal femora (ap/ml ratio: 1.10 abnormal vs. 1.07 normal).

Conclusions: The CAM impinging femur has many abnormalities apart from the morphology of the head/neck junction. These femora have increased neck width and head/neck ratio, a smaller spherical bearing surface, and reduced neck offset from the medullary canal. Moreover, the presence of posterior head displacement and reduced anteversion should be appreciated when assessing treatment options, as surgical treatment limited to localized re-contouring of the head–neck profile may fail to address significant components of the underlying abnormality.