Purpose: Functional outcome after shoulder arthrodesis was evaluated to assess indications for the treatment of posttraumatic partial and total brachial plexus paralysis in adults.

Material and methods: Twenty-seven patients who underwent glenohumeral arthrodesis for posttraumatic brachial plexus paralysis were reviewed. Eleven had radicular paralysis (C5, C6 and C5, C6, C7) and sixteen total paralysis. All patients recovered active elbow flexion. Shoulder reinnervation had failed in eleven patients. Before the arthrodesis, 22 patients could no use their paralysed limb. Mean time between direct neurological surgery and arthrodesis was 30 months for partial paralyses and 20 months for total paralyses. Glenohumeal screw fixation was used for the arthrodesis which was associated with an external fixation in 21.

Results: Mean postoperative follow-up was 70 months. There were two cases of non-union which fused after revision and three cases of humerus fracture which occurred during the first six months after surgery. Pain related to inferior subluxation improved in six patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups for position of the fusion, or postoperative active motion (60° flexion, 60° abduction, 45° internal rotation and 7 to −9° external rotation). There was a significant difference in force which was greater for superior paralyses (11 kgf versus 7 kgf in flexion, 12 kfg versus 7 kgf in abduction, 6 kgf versus 2 kgf in external rotation and 11 kgf versus 4 kgf in internal rotation). The same was true for hand movement. The differences were statistically correlated with force of the pectoralis major.

Conclusion: Glenohumeral arthrodesis provides significant improvement in function in patients with supraclavicular brachial plexus paralysis, even with a paralytic hand. Arthrodesis also allows reorienting surgical reinnervation to other functions such as hand movement. Shoulder force and hand movement are directly correlated with force of the pectoralis major.

Purpose: Until recently, evaluation of surgical treatment for brachial plexus palsy has been purely analytic, not taking into account the patient’s overall functional capacity nor his/her quality of life. The unilateral nature of these palsies and the fact that the limb remains healthy requires a global assessment of outcome. We propose here to associate the classical analytical evaluation with a global quality of life evaluation to determine the beneficial effect of surgical treatment for partial or total brachial plexus palsy.

Material and methods: Forty-four patients, mean age 30 years (17–60) were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 34 months. These patients were divided into two groups: C5–C6 ± C7 palsy (n=18), C5-T1 palsy (n=26). In each group, we recorded a complete muscle analysis, a visual analogue scale test of pain, and results of three quality of life questionnaires (DASH, Abilhand, MOS SF-36). We studied for each group the influence of recovered elbow flexion (biceps ≥ M3+), recovered shoulder function (abduction ≥ M3+), and residual pain on quality of life.

Results: The overall analysis did not demonstrate any difference in quality of life between partial and complete palsy. The three questionnaires were correlated with each other (p< 0.03). Residual pain (visual analogue scale ≥ 4 in 59% of the patients) was correlated with quality of life (p< 0.05) while involvement of the dominant side did not have any influence. In the partial palsy group, recovery of shoulder function (61%, n=11) improved significantly all the quality of life scores (p< 0.01). Conversely, recovery of elbow flexion (72%, n=13) did not improve quality of life in patients with a functional shoulder (p< 0.02). In the group with total palsy, recovery of shoulder function (77%, n=20) appeared to be as least as important as elbow flexion on quality of life (p ≤ 0.05).

Discussion: Unlike generally accepted notions, postoperative assessment of quality of life in these brachial plexus palsy patients demonstrates the importance of shoulder function which appears to be as least as important as recovery of elbow flexion. Furthermore, persistent pain appeared as one of the main negative factors affecting quality of life. Appropriate management is necessary.