Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 522 - 522
1 Nov 2011
Descamps S Boisgard S Texier CH Bouillet B Levai J
Full Access

Purpose of the study: The purpose of this work was to report the outcome at minimum ten years follow-up of cemented Muller total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a metal-on-metal bearing and a CLS cup.

Material and methods: From June 1995 to August 1997, 110 THA were implanted in 102 patients for degenerative hip disease. At last follow-up, 23 patients had died, four were lost to follow-up, and 67 were reviewed. Mean age was 56 years (29–71). BMI: 26.2 (17.9–33.6). Mean follow-up was 12 years (10–13). The same operative technique was used for all implantations: transgluteal approach, Palacos Gentamycine® cement, straight femoral stem, Muller prosthesis made of Protasul®10, with a Metasul® head and a CLS cup with a polyethylene sandwich Metasul® insert. Outcome was assessed clinically with the Merle score, radiographically searching for signs of loosening using the Harris criteria for the femoral component and the Hodgkinson criteria for the acetabular component. Migration was measured with the Nunn method for the cup and the Sutherland method for the femur. Dobbs actuarial survival was determined.

Results: Nine patients (9THA) underwent revision for acetabular migration (n=4), cup fracture by cam effect (n=1), psoas syndrome (n=2), retarded hypersensitivity (n=1), infection (n=1). At last follow-up, the clinical outcome was good or very good (n=64), fair (n=2), poor (n=1). Radiologically, for the femur: lucent lines (n=0), osteolysis (n=4), migration (n=0); for the cup: lucent line < 1mm stable and non migrating (n=3), global lucent line with migration > 5mm (radiological loosening) (n=1). No correlation between clinical and radiographic outcomes. Survival was 89.4±7.6% for revision outside infection and 92.6±6.9% for aseptic loosening.

Discussion: The failures at ten years were all acetabular, but related to various causes. Defective fixation could be related to the implant design or to the use of a hard-on-hard bearing increasing peripheral stress. Hypersensitivity and a cam effect related directly to using the metal-on-metal bearing. The psoas syndrome was not related to the type of cup.

Conclusion: Use of a metal-on-metal bearing, which theoretically improves wear, leads to other constraints in terms of fixation, technique, and context which must be taken into consideration to improve outcomes.