The flat foot is a frequent deformity in children and results in various levels of functional alterations. A diagnosis based on foot morphology is not sufficient to define the therapeutic approach. In fact, the degree of severity of the deformity and the effects of treatments require careful functional assessment. In case of functional flatfoot, subtalar arthroereisis is the surgical treatment of choice. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of two different bioabsorbable implants designed for subtalar arthroereisis in childhood severe flat foot by means of thorough gait analysis.

Ten children (11.3 ± 1.6 yrs, 19.7 ± 2.8 BMI) were operated for flat foot correction [1,2] in both feet, one with the calcaneo-stop method, i.e. a screw implanted into the calcaneus, the other with an endoprosthesis implanted into the sinus-tarsi. Gait analysis was performed pre- and 24 month post-operatively using a 8-camera motion system (Vicon, UK) and a surface EMG system (Cometa, Italy) to detect muscular activation of the main lower limb muscles. A combination of established protocols, for lower limb [3] and multi-segment foot [4] kinematic analysis, was used to calculate joint rotations and moments during three level walking trials for each patient. At the foot, the tibio-talar, Chopart, Lisfranc, 1^st metatarso-phalangeal joints were tracked in three-dimensions, together with the medial longitudinal arch.

Significant differences in standard X-ray measurements were observed between pre- and post-op, but not between the two treatment groups. Analysis of the kinematic variables revealed functional improvements after surgery. In particular, a reduction of eversion between the shank and calcaneus (about 15° on average) and a reduction of inversion between metatarsus and calcaneus (about 18° on average) were detected between pre- and post-operatively after both treatments. Activation of the main plantar/dorsiflexor muscles was similar at both pre- and post-op assessments with both implants.

The combined lower limb and multi-segment foot kinematic analyses were found adequate to provide accurate functional assessment of the feet and of the lower limbs. Both surgical treatments restored nearly normal kinematics of the foot and of the lower limb joints, associated also to a physiologic muscular activation.

In total knee replacement (TKR), neutral mechanical alignment (NMA) is targeted in prosthetic component implantation. A novel implantation approach, referred to as kinematic alignment (KA), has been recently proposed (Eckhoff et al. 2005). This is based on the pre-arthritic lower limb alignment which is reconstructed using suitable image-based techniques, and is claimed to allow better soft-tissue balance (Eckhoff et al. 2005) and restoration of physiological joint function. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) introduced in TKR to execute personalized prosthesis component implantation are used for KA. The aim of this study was to report knee kinematics and electromyography (EMG) for a number lower limb muscles from two TKR patient groups, i.e. operated according to NMA via conventional instrumentation, or according to KA via PSI.

20 patients affected by primary gonarthrosis were implanted with a cruciate-retaining fixed-bearing prosthesis with patella resurfacing (Triathlon® by Stryker®, Kalamazoo, MI-USA). 17 of these patients, i.e. 11 operated targeting NMA (group A) via convention instrumentation and 6 targeting KA (group B) via PSI (ShapeMatch® by Stryker®, Kalamazoo, MI-USA), were assessed clinically using the International Knee Society Scoring (IKSS) System and biomechanically at 6-month follow-up. Knee kinematics during stair-climbing, chair-rising and extension-against-gravity was analysed by means of 3D video-fluoroscopy (CAT® Medical System, Monterotondo, Italy) synchronized with 4-channel EMG analysis (EMG Mate, Cometa®, Milan, Italy) of the main knee ad/abductor and flexor/extensor muscles. Knee joint motion was calculated in terms of flex/extension (FE), ad/abduction (AA), and internal/external rotation (IE), together with axial rotation of condyle contact point line (CLR).

Postoperative knee and functional IKSS scores in group A were 78±20 and 80±23, worse than in group B, respectively 91±12 and 90±15. Knee motion patterns were much more consistent over patients in group B than A. In both groups, normal ranges were found for FE, IE and AA, the latter being generally smaller than 3°. Average IE ranges in the three motor tasks were respectively 8.2°±3.2°, 10.1°±3.9° and 7.9°±4.0° in group A, and 6.6°±4.0°, 10.5°±2.5° and 11.0°±3.9° in group B. Relevant CLRs were 8.2°±3.2°, 10.2°±3.7° and 8.8°±5.3° in group A, and 7.3°±3.5°, 12.6°±2.6° and 12.5°±4.2° in group B. EMG analysis revealed prolonged activation of the medial/lateral vasti muscles in group A. Such muscle co-contraction was not generally observed in all patients in group B, this perhaps proving more stability in the knee replaced following the KA approach.

These results reveal that KA results in better function than NMA in TKR. Though small differences were observed between groups, the higher data consistency and the less prolonged muscle activations detected using KA support indirectly the claim of a more natural knee soft tissue balance.

References

Rehabilitation systems based on inertial measurement units (IMU) and bio-feedbacks are increasingly used in many different settings for patients with neurological disorders such as Parkinson disease or balance impairment, and more recently for functional recover after orthopedic surgical interventions or injuries especially concerning the lower limb. These systems claim to provide a more controlled and correct execution of the motion exercises to be performed within the rehabilitation programs, hopefully resulting in a better outcomes with respect to the traditional direct support of a physical therapists. In particular recruitment of specific muscles during the exercise is expression of its correct and finalized execution. The objective of this study was to compare muscular activation patterns of relevant lower limb muscles during different exercises performed with traditional rehabilitation and with a new validated system based on IMU and biofeedback (Riablo, Corehab, Trento, Italy).

Twelve healthy subjects (mean age 28.1 ± 3.9, BMI 21.8± 2.1) were evaluated in a rehabilitation center. Muscular activation pattern of gluteus maximum, gluteus medium, rectus femoris and biceps femoris was recorded through surface EMG (Cometa; Milan) during six different motion tasks: hip abduction in standing position, lunge, hip flexion with extended knee in standing position, lateral lunge, hip abduction with extended knee in lateral decubitus, squat. Subjects performed 10 repetitions of each task for a total of 100 repetitions per motion task, with and without Riablo System as well as during standard rehabilitation. An additional IMU was positioned on the shank in order to detect beginning and end of each repetition. A single threshold algorithm was used to identify muscle activation timing.

During hip abduction in standing position, gluteus maximum and rectus femoris showed a better and longer activation pattern while using Riablo compared to traditional rehabilitation. Gluteus medium showed a similar activation pattern whereas biceps femoris showed no activation from 30% to 80% using Riablo. During squat, rectus femoris and biceps femoris had a similar activation pattern with and without Riablo whereas gluteus maximum and gluteus medium showed a better activation pattern while using Riablo.

The recent development of innovative rehabilitation systems meets the need of manageable, reliable and efficient instruments able to reduce rehabilitation costs but with the same good clinical outcomes. Muscular activation patterns of relevant lower limb muscles during selected motion tasks reveal their correct execution. The use of this new rehabilitation system based on IMU and biofeedback seems to allow a more selective and effective muscular recruitment, likely due to the more correct and controlled execution of the exercise, particularly for the identification and interdiction of possible compensation mechanisms.

INTRODUCTION

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the effectiveness of the mechanical alignment (MA) within 0°±3° has been recently questioned. A novel implantation approach, i.e. the kinematic alignment (KA), emerged recently, this being based on the pre-arthritic lower-limb alignment. In KA, the trans-cylindrical axis is used as the reference, instead of the trans-epicondylar one, for femoral component alignment. This axis is defined as the line passing through the centres of the posterior femoral condyles modeled as cylinders. Recently, patient specific instrumentation (PSI) has been introduced in TKA as an alternative to conventional instrumentation. This provides a tool for preoperative implant planning also via KA. Particularly, KA using PSI seems to be more effective in restoring normal joint kinematics and muscle activity.

The purpose of this study was to report preliminarily joint kinematic and electromyography results of two patient groups operated via conventional MA or KA, the latter using PSI.

During total knee replacement (TKR), knee surgical navigation systems (KSNS) report in real time relative motion data between the tibia and the femur from the patient under anaesthesia, in order to identify best possible locations for the corresponding prosthesis components. These systems are meant to support the surgeon for achieving the best possible replication of natural knee motion, compatible with the prosthesis design and the joint status, in the hope that this kinematics under passive condition will be then the same during the daily living activities of the patient. Particularly, by means of KSNS, knee kinematics is tracked in the original arthritic joint at the beginning of the operation, intra-operatively after adjustments of bone cuts and trial components implantation, and after final components implantation and cementation. Rarely the extent to which the kinematics in the latter condition is then replicated during activity is analysed. As for the assessment of the active motion performance, the most accurate technique for the in-vivo measurements of replaced joint kinematics is three-dimensional video-fluoroscopy. This allows joint motion tracking under typical movements and loads of daily living. The general aim of this study is assessing the capability of the current KSNS to predict replaced joint motion after TKR. Particularly, the specific objective is to compare, for a number of patients implanted with two different TKR prosthesis component designs, knee kinematics obtained intra-operatively after final component implantation measured by means of KSNS with that assessed post-operatively at the follow-up by means of three-dimensional video-fluoroscopy.

Thirty-one patients affected by primary gonarthrosis were implanted with a fixed bearing posterior-stabilized TKR design, either the Journey® (JOU; Smith&Nephew, London, UK) or the NRG® (Stryker®-Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ-USA). All implantations were performed by means of a KSNS (Stryker®-Leibinger, Freiburg, Germany), utilised to track and store joint kinematics intra-operatively immediately after final component implantation (INTRA-OP). Six months after TKR, the patients were followed for clinical assessment and three-dimensional video fluoroscopy (POST-OP). Fifteen of these patients, 8 with the JOU and 7 with the NRG, gave informed consent and these were analyzed. At surgery (INTRA-OP), a spatial tracker of the navigation system was attached through two bi-cortical 3 mm thick Kirschner wires to the distal femur and another to the proximal tibia. The conventional navigation procedure recommended in the system manual was performed to calculate the preoperative deformity including the preoperative lower limb alignment, to perform the femoral and tibial bone cuts, and to measure the final lower limb alignment. All these assessment were calculated with respect to the initial anatomical survey, the latter being based on calibrations of anatomical landmarks by an instrumented pointer. Patients were then analysed (POST-OP) by three-dimensional video-fluoroscopy (digital remote-controlled diagnostic Alpha90SX16; CAT Medical System, Rome-Italy) at 10 frames per second during chair rising-sitting, stair climbing, and step up-down. A technique based on CAD-model shape matching was utilised for obtaining three-dimensional pose of the prosthesis components. Between the two techniques, the kinematics variables analysed for the comparison were the three components of the joint rotation (being the relative motion between the tibial and femoral components represented using a standard joint convention, the translation of the line through the medial and lateral contact points (being these points assumed to be where the minimum distance between the femoral condyles and the tibial baseplate is observed) on the tibial baseplate and the corresponding pivot point, and the location of the instantaneous helical axes with the corresponding mean helical axis and pivot point.

In all patients and in both conditions, physiological ranges of flexion (from −5° to 120°), and ab-adduction (±5°) were observed. Internal-external rotation patterns are different between the two prostheses, with a more central pivoting in NRG and medial pivoting in JOU, as expected by the design. Restoration of knee joint normal kinematics was demonstrated also by the coupling of the internal rotation with flexion, as well as by the roll-back and screw-home mechanisms, observed somehow both in INTRA- and POST-OP measurements. Location of the mean helical axis and pivot point, both from the contact lines and helical axes, were very consistent over time, i.e. after six months from intervention and in fully different conditions. Only one JOU and one NRG patient had the pivot point location POST-OP different from that INTRA-OP, despite cases of paradoxical translation.

In all TKR knees analysed, a good restoration of normal joint motion was observed, both during operation and at the follow-up. This supports the general efficacy of the surgery and of both prosthesis designs. Particularly, the results here reported show a good consistency of the measurements over time, no matter these were taken in very different joint conditions and by means of very different techniques. Intra-operative kinematics therefore does matter, and must be taken into careful consideration for the implantation of the prosthesis components. Joint kinematics should be tracked accurately during TKR surgery, and for this purpose KSNS seem to offer a very good support. These systems not only supports in real time the best possible alignment of the prosthesis components, but also make a reliable prediction of the motion performance of the replaced joint. Additional analyses will be necessary to support this with a statistical power, and to identify the most predicting parameters among the many kinematics variables here analysed preliminarily.