Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_15 | Pages 76 - 76
1 Mar 2013
Ichinohe S Tajima G Kamei Y Maruyama M Shimamura T
Full Access

It is very difficult to perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for severe varus bowing deformity of femur. We performed simultaneous combined femoral supra-condyle valgus osteotomy and TKA for the case had bilateral varus knees with bowing deformity of femurs.

Case presentation

A 62-year-old woman consulted our clinic with bilateral knee pain and walking distability. She was diagnosed rickets and had bilateral severe varus bowing deformity of femurs from an infant. Her height was 133 cm and body weight was 51 kg. Bilateral femur demonstrated severe bowing and her knee joint demonstrated varus deformity with medial joint line tenderness, no local heat, and no joint effusion. Bilateral knee ROM was 90 degrees with motion crepitus. Bilateral lower leg demonstrated mild internal rotation deformity. Bilateral JOA knee score was 40 Roentgenogram demonstrated knee osteoarthritis with incomplete development of femoral condyle. Mechanical FTA angles were 206 degree on the right and 201 on the left. She was received right simultaneous femoral supra-condyle valgus osteotomy with TKA was performed at age 63. Key points of surgical techniques were to use the intramedullary guide for valgus osteotomy as temporary reduction and fixation then performed mono-cortical locking plate fixation. Several mono cortical screws were exchanged to bi-cortical screws after implantation of the femoral component with long stem. Cast fixation performed during two weeks and full weight bearing permitted at 7 weeks after surgery. Her JOA score was slightly improved 50 due to other knee problems at 9 months after surgery, her right mechanical FTA was decreased to 173, and she received left simultaneous femoral supra-condyle valgus osteotomy with TKA as the same technique at April of this year. She has been receiving rehabilitation at now.

Conclusions

Most causes of varus knee deformity are defect or deformity of medial tibial condyle and TKA for theses cases are not difficult to use tibial augment devices. However the cases like our presentation need supra-femoral condyle osteotomy before TKA. It was easy and useful to use intramedullary guide for valgus osteotomy as temporary reduction and fixation then performed mono-cortical locking plate fixation before TKA.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 237 - 237
1 Nov 2002
Ichinohe S Yoshida M Tajima G Akasaka T Honda T Shimamura T
Full Access

Purpose: To evaluate repair of articular cartilage.

Methods: Ten cases of ten knees (6 males and 4 females) were evaluated in the current study. Seven knees treated by osteochondral graft including six receiving mosaic plasty and one receiving Pasteurization. Four knees treated by periosteal graft. One knee received both mosaicplasty and periosteal graft. Mean patient age at surgery was 31 years old. Eight knees underwent follow-up MRI, 6 knees underwent follow-up arthroscopy, and 4 knees underwent needle biopsy after informed consent was obtained. The mean period from the surgery to final follow-up was 21 months. The mean period from surgery to follow-up arthroscopy was 10 months.

Results: Seven cases of osteochondral graft presented good regeneration of articular surface by MRI and arthroscopic examination. Two knees receiving mosaic plasty demonstrated regeneration of hyaline cartilage even between the gaps in mosaicplasty. However, the structure of hyaline cartilage differed from that of normal cartilage. Pasteurization in one case also demonstrated good regeneration of hyaline cartilage. One knee treated by periosteal graft demonstrated regeneration of hyaline cartilage. However, the graft area in another such knee was covered by fibrous tissue. One periosteal graft became detached 14 days after surgery. There were no cases showing ossification after periosteal graft.

Conclusion: Periosteal graft could cover a wide defect of articular surface. However, induction of cartilage was not good. Osteochondral graft is a sure method of repairing hyaline cartilage where there is a small defect in the articular surface. Our results from needle biopsy demonstrated hyaline cartilage in the gaps among mosaicplasty areas, but the structure of hyaline cartilage was not good. There is a risk of re-degeneration due to the poor structure of hyaline cartilage. Careful observation is needed in both periosteal graft and mosaic plasty cases.