Background:

Internet interventions provide an opportunity to encourage patients with LBP to self-manage and remain active, by tailoring advice and providing evidence-based support for increasing physical activity. This paper reports the development of the ‘SupportBack’ internet intervention, designed for use with usual primary care, as the first stage of a feasibility RCT currently underway comparing: usual primary care alone; usual care plus the internet intervention; usual care plus the internet intervention with physiotherapist telephone support.

Aim

Cementless prosthesis is one of the major bone-implant interface fixation methods in total joint replacement. Grit blasted surface, hydroxyapatite coated surface and plasma sprayed metallic porous coating have been popularly used. The latter has demonstrated higher bone implant mechanical stability in previous laboratory study in early and middle stages. However, question remains what the mechanism is to make it performing better and how to improve them further. This study is designed to examine the mode of failure in bone-implant interface in a sheep model.

This study was performed to compare the mechanism of bone-implant integration and mechanical stability among three popularly used cementless implant surfaces. Plasma sprayed porous surface (TiPL), grit-blasted rough surface (TiGB), and hydroxyapatite coated implant surface (HA) were tested in a sheep model at 4 and 12 weeks. The integration patterns were investigated using histology, histomorphometry, and mechanical strength by push-out test. All three groups demonstrated early bone ongrowth on their surfaces, with much of the ongrowth resembling contact osteogenesis. TiPL group showed bone anchorage into porous coating with new bone ingrowth into the pores. HA group revealed small cracks at its coating at 12 weeks time point. Plasma sprayed porous surface also demonstrated its superior mechanical stability maybe reinforced by its bone anchorage, whearas, HA surface exhibited higher osteoconductivity with highest ongrowth rate.

Single level posterolateral spinal fusion in rabbits is the accepted preclinical model for evaluating bone graft substitutes or treatments to enhance/augment healing. This study aimed to improve preclinical testing by developing a multi-level unilateral fusion model that could be used as a screening tool prior to larger scale preclinical experiments.

A four level unilateral posterolateral fusion was performed in nine animals. The materials were randomly allocated and placed between the decorticated surfaces of the transverse processes and vertebral bodies. Animals were euthanised at three, six and 12 weeks. The materials were (1) 25 kGy y-irradiated rabbit allograft chips (RAC), (2) SCF RAC, (3) 60% tri-calcium phosphate, 40% hydroxyapatite formagraft (BiOstetic) (4) Autograft (1.5 cc morsellised to 1-2.5 mm granules). The autograft was harvested from the iliac crest using the L5-L6 incision. Endpoints included x-ray, CT, micro CT and histology.

The animals tolerated the surgery well. Radiographic data provided a useful method to differentiate between groups. Micro CT however was extremely valuable demonstrating new bone formation as early as three weeks across the groups. Gamma irradiated samples demonstrated an initial inflammatory reaction while the autograft, SCF allograft and synthetic TCP did not show this response. As expected, time was an important factor demonstrating the maturity in the fusions. These materials responded in a similar fashion in this model as observed in a single level fusion.

A unilateral multi-level fusion can be performed in rabbits to provide a useful screening for different materials. Gamma irradiated allograft has an initial inflammatory reaction that may be related to the presence of residual cellular material whereas SCF and synthetic materials do not.