Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 219 - 219
1 May 2011
Karamanis N Papanagiotou M Varitimidis S Basdekis G Stamatiou G Dailiana Z Malizos K
Full Access

Introduction: The aim of this study is to present the effect of various local anaesthetics, in particular solution concentrations, in peri- and post-operative analgesia in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Material and Method: 105 patients with CTS (81 female, 24 male, ages 27–79) underwent carpal tunnel release under local anaesthesia. The patients were divided into 5 groups (xylocaine 2%, ropivacaine 0.75%, ropivacaine 0.375%, chirocaine 0.5%, chirocaine 0.25%). A tablet of Gabapentin (Neurontin) 400mg was administered to some patients of each group (41 pts of the 105pts) 12 hours prior to surgery. All patients were evaluated immediately after surgery, in 2 weeks and 2 months postoperatively according to VAS pain score, grip strength, finger active motion and two point discrimination. Postoperative complications were also reported.

Results: Anesthesia was immediate after the local injection. All patients improved postoperativelly regarding relief from pain and paresthesias. There was no statistically significant difference in grip strength before and after surgery. Only 10 patients used paracetamol immediately after surgery, without any statistically significant correlation to any group of patients. 1 patient developed complex regional pain syndrome 2 months after surgery.

Conclusion: The use of local anaesthesia in carpal tunnel release surgery is beneficial in providing immediate intraoperative effect and recovery and mobilization after surgery. Rehabilitation seems to be irrelevant of the type of local anaesthetic that was used during the procedure. Small solution concentrations of local anaesthetics (ropivacaine 0.375%, chirocaine 0.25%) provide adequate analgesia during surgery and provide a normal postoperative course.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 91-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 45 - 45
1 Mar 2009
Poultsides L Varitimidis S Dailiana Z Klitsaki A Theodorou E Stamatiou G Malizos K
Full Access

Introduction: TKA is usually performed under general or spinal anaesthesia (SA). Most of the patients who undergo this procedure are old and their postoperative rehabilitation could be compromised due to the adverse effects of the relevant anaesthesia. Lumbar Plexus and Sciatic nerve Block (LPSB) have been increasingly applied for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. The aim of this study is to compare the time required for the performance of the anaesthesia technique, the quality of intraoperative anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia, the incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications, the blood loss at the recovery room and the required intraoperative intravenous (IV) administration of fluid volume.

Material & Methods: Fifty (50) patients, mean age 70± 5years, ASA I-III were randomly divided into two groups to receive spinal anaesthesia (group A) or LPSB (group B). Patients in group A (n=25) received hyperbaric Bupi-vacaine 0.5% plus 15mcq Fentanyl through atraumatic 25g needle. Lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block were performed with a 15cm insulated needle (Brown) and nerves were identified by a peripheral electric nerve stimulator. 30 and 15 ml of Ropivacaine (0.5%) were used for each block respectively. All patients received 0.2mg/ Kg of Midazolam and 50μg of Fentanyl IV. The success of the technique was defined as a complete sensory and motor block. All patients received postoperatively Patient-Controlled Anaesthesia (PCA) with morphine intravenously. Time to perform blockade, sensory and complete motor block, hemodynamic parameters, blood loss, IV fluid volume, postoperative analgesic requirements and satisfaction score were recorded. Results were analyzed with Chi Square test and Student’s t-test (level of significance: p< 0.05).

Results: Demographic data, operating time and hemo-dynamic parameters were similar in both groups. Three patients (group B) had insufficient blocks and were converted to general anaesthesia. Although SA is performed and accomplishes complete motor and sensory blockade faster (p< 0,05), LPSB leaded to decreased necessity of intraoperative fluid loading and blood loss at the recovery room (p< 0,05). Overall patient’s satisfaction till leaving the recovery room, Visual Analogue Score (VAS) intraoperatively, 4 and 8hours postoperatively and analgesic counts (recorded through the PCA) in the first 24hours were statistically significant between two groups, in favor of patients with LPSB.

Conclusion: PLSB is an effective alternative to spinal anesthesia taking into account basic clinical and anaesthesiological parameters intraoperatively and immediate postoperatively. Concerning postoperative pain and required administration of analgesics during the first 24hours, LPSB is more efficient compared to SA, underlining the importance of overall patient’s satisfaction during the first postoperative day.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 174 - 174
1 Feb 2004
Zachos VH Simaioforidou M Stamatiou G Zibis AH Karachalios TS Hantes ME
Full Access

Introduction: Regional anaesthesia is used recently more often in minor and intermediate orthopaedic procedures. This study evaluates regional anaesthesia in knee arthroscopy.

Patients and Method: From September 2002 to February 2003, sixty three patients had knee arthroscopy by regional blockade, (mean age 28, 3 years). Thirty ml Ropivacaine 5% and 10 ml Lidocaine 2% were used to block sciatic and femoral nerve with nerve stimulator help.

Results: They were realized 31 meniscectomies, 8 meniscal repairs, 6 primary ACL reconstructions, 2 ACL revisions, 5 chondroplasties, 6 lateral releases, 2 Fulkerson osteotomies, 4 plica removals, 2 adhesionlysis, 2 localized villonodular synovitis, one total synovectomy and one arthroscopic removal prepatellar bursa. There was no complication concerning the nerve blockade. Two of 8 ACL patients required general anesthesia and one had sedation during the procedure. Sedation also was necessary in three patients with lateral release and two meniscal repairs. The remaining 55 patients were tolerated the arthroscopic procedure without any additional help. All patients hospitalized less than 24 hours except patients with ACL reconstruction. They needed 1, 2 analgesic pills per person. The cost for the anesthetic procedure was 40 euros.

Conclusion: Regional anesthesia has the advantage of avoiding the complications of general anesthesia, is of low cost and well bearable from the majority of patients. It offers prolonged postoperative analgesia and has no complications.