Introduction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are one of the most common knee injuries amongst elite athletes and usually require an ACL reconstruction (ACLR) to enable return to sport. Secondary surgery can result in a longer rehabilitation period and often a

significant time away from sport which can have implications to the athlete including contract obligations and sponsorship. Advances in ACLR techniques and meniscal repair techniques as well as an awareness of meniscal root lesions, ramp lesions and lateral extraarticular procedures (LEAPs) during ACL surgery has improved outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the rates of secondary surgery following the introduction of a systematic arthroscopic evaluation of the knee, improved meniscal repair techniques and the addition of a concomitant LEAP This systematic approach was introduced after October 2012 (10/2012).

Introduction

It has been contentious whether an anatomic double-bundle technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR)is superior to that of a single-bundle technique. It has been hypothesized in the literature that the double-bundle technique could provide function closer to that of the anatomical knee joint. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term clinical outcomes after single-bundle ACLR versus double-bundle ACLR. We hypothesized that the double-bundle technique would not be superior to the single-bundle technique.

Purpose: Bilateral tears of the ACL are classically described as occurring after a first tear. Few reports have examined the underlying mechanism and the frequency and predisposing morphological factors

Material and methods: We reviewed retrospectively a series of 3722 ACL plasties performed from 1984 to 2001, including 148 patients who underwent bilateral repair. In this group, we detailed the demographic features, the time from tear to repair, the type of sports activity and focused on the radiological measurement of tibial tilt.

Results: The estimated frequency of bilateral tears was 4%. We noted that these bilateral tears were associated with: male predominance (60%), mean age 21 years (±5.5) at first tear, younger age for females, second tear at 24.5±6.5 years, predominant practice of pivot sports without contact (56%), and competition sports. The time between the two tears was 48 months on average. The rate of contralateral tears during the first postoperative year was 16%, it was 60% at three years. The mean tibial tilt was 9.91±2.87° versus 6.8±1.87° in the control population.

Discussion: Our findings were in agreement with the literature for frequency, young age at first tear, particularly for women, short time between the two tears, and type of sports activity. The high rate of contralateral tears during the first year is a significant finding. Hypotheses put forward include loss of confidence in the operated knee leading to more stress on the contralateral knee, but also poorly adapted use of the healthy knee in sports activity. Rehabilitation exercises focusing on bilateral proprioception, respecting sufficient time after the first repair before resuming sports activities, and good control of knee laxity with an ‘anatomic’ plasty appear to be important elements of prevention. The favouring role of a narrow intercondylar notch has been established in the literature. We found that tibial tilt should also be taken into consideration.

Conclusion: Careful search for predisposing factors is important because of the frequency of bilateral tears of the ACL. The rehabilitation program should be well adapted and the patient should be informed of the risk. These measures should help decrease the incidence of this relatively frequent complication.