Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_19 | Pages 19 - 19
22 Nov 2024
Hanssen J Veerman K Van der Jagt O Somford M Lammers J Poolman R Peters E Visser J Bos K Verhagen R Vehmeijer S Zijlstra W Nolte P Wouthuyzen-Bakker M Mahdad R Vlasveld I De Boer MG Scheper H
Full Access

Aim

Rifampicin and fluoroquinolone based therapy is generally considered as first-choice targeted oral antimicrobial therapy for staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections (PJI) treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). Alternative equally effective antimicrobial strategies are urgently needed due to toxicity and drug-drug interactions that frequently occur with this strategy. Data from recent clinical studies suggests equipoise for other antimicrobial treatment regimens. The objective of the Rifampicin Combination Therapy versus Targeted Antimicrobial Monotherapy in the Oral Antimicrobial Treatment Phase of Staphylococcal Prosthetic Joint Infection (RiCOTTA)-trial is to evaluate whether monotherapy with clindamycin is non-inferior to rifampicin/fluoroquinolone combination therapy in patients with staphylococcal PJI that are treated with DAIR.

Method

The RiCOTTA-trial is a multicenter, non-inferiority, open-label, randomized controlled trial evaluating clindamycin versus rifampicin/fluoroquinolone combination therapy in the oral treatment phase in patients with staphylococcal PJI managed with DAIR. The trial is performed in 16 hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible patients are adults with staphylococcal knee or hip PJI managed by DAIR. Patients are included one to six days before antibiotic treatment is switched from intravenous to oral therapy. Patients with a contraindication for rifampicin, with a megaprosthesis or who receive intravenous antibiotics for more than three weeks after initial debridement are excluded. Primary outcome is treatment success one year after finishing antimicrobial treatment. Success is defined as the absence of: i. Infection related re-surgery, ii. New episode of antibiotic treatment for infection of the index joint after the initial treatment phase of 12 weeks, iii. Ongoing use of antibiotics for the index joint at the end of follow-up, iv. Death. The estimated treatment success of rifampicin combination therapy is 85% and the monotherapy strategy is considered not inferior when the difference in treatment success will be less than 10%. Enrolment of 158 patients per group (316 in total) is needed to confirm non-inferiority of monotherapy with a power of 80%. The trial is currently open for enrolment. The study is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee Leiden, the Hague, Delft, the Netherlands and registered under EU trial number 2022-501620-26-00 in Clinical Trial Information System.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 82 - 82
1 Oct 2022
Scheper H Mahdad R Elzer B Löwik C Zijlstra W Gosens T van der Lugt J van der Wal R Poolman R Somford M Jutte P Bos K Kooijman C Maree H Nelissen R Visser LG De Boer MG
Full Access

Background

The duration and extent of postoperative wound leakage after joint arthroplasty in patients with or without a complicated course, like a prosthetic joint infection (PJI), is currently unknown. Adequate differentiation between normal postoperative wound leakage and wound leakage due to a postoperative PJI is important and prevents unnecessary surgical procedures. We investigated the association between postoperative wound leakage and development of PJI in patients who used a previously developed mobile wound care app.

Methods

A multicenter, prospective cohort study with patients aged 18 years or older after primary implantation or revision of a total joint arthroplasty. During 30 post-operative days after arthroplasty, patients recorded their wound status in the woundcare app. An algorithm calculated a daily score from imputed data. If the daily score exceeded a predefined threshold, the patients received an alert that advised them to contact their physician.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 90 - 90
1 Sep 2012
Haverkamp D Somford M Klinkenbijl M Vis Van Der H Albers R
Full Access

Background

A lot of discussion persists whether obesity negatively influences the outcome of hip arthroplasty. Current literature does not answer this question, since manuscripts showing a worse outcome and those showing a similar outcome can both be found. We performed a meta-analysis with the primary research question whether obesity has a negative influence on short and long term outcome of total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

A search of the literature was performed and studies comparing the outcome of hip arthroplasty in different weight groups were included. Methodology of the included studies was scored according to the Cochrane guidelines. Data extraction and pooling of the data was performed. For continuous data a weighted mean difference and for dichotomous variables a weighted Odds ratio was calculated. Heterogeneity was calculated using I2 statistics.