Aims

The primary aim of this study is to assess the survival of the uncemented hydroxyapatite (HA) coated Trident II acetabular component as part of a hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a cemented Exeter stem. The secondary aims are to assess the complications, joint-specific function, health-related quality of life, and radiological signs of loosening of the acetabular component.

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to compare the hip-specific functional outcome of robotic assisted total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) with manual total hip arthroplasty (mTHA) in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Secondary aims were to compare general health improvement, patient satisfaction, and radiological component position and restoration of leg length between rTHA and mTHA.

Aims

The primary aim of the study was to compare the knee-specific functional outcome of robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (rUKA) with manual total knee arthroplasty (mTKA) for the management of isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis. Secondary aims were to compare length of hospital stay, general health improvement, and satisfaction between rUKA and mTKA.

Patient function is poorly characterised following revision TKA. Modern semi-constrained implants are suggested to offer high levels of function, however, data is lacking to justify this claim.

52 consecutive aseptic revision TKA procedures performed at a single centre were prospectively evaluated; all were revision of a primary implant to a Triathlon total stabiliser prosthesis. Patients were assessed pre-operatively and at 6, 26, 52 and 104 weeks post-op. Outcome assessments were the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), range of motion, pain rating scale and timed functional assessment battery. Analysis was by repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD 95% simultaneous confidence intervals as pairwise comparison. Secondary analysis compared the results of this revision cohort to previously reported primary TKA data, performed by the same surgeons, with identical outcome assessments at equivalent time points.

Mean age was 73.23 (SD 10.41) years, 57% were male. Mean time since index surgery was 9.03 (SD 5.6) years. 3 patients were lost to follow-up. All outcome parameters improved significantly over time (p <0.001). Post-hoc analysis demonstrated that all outcomes changed between pre-op, 6 week and 26 weeks post-op assessments.

No difference was seen between primary and revision cohorts in OKS (p = 0.2) or pain scores (p=0.19). Range of motion and functional performance was different between groups over the 2 year period (p=0.03), however this was due to differing pre-operative scores, post-hoc analysis showed no difference between groups at any post-operative time point.

Patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA with semi-constrained implants made substantial improvements in OKS, pain scores, knee flexion, and timed functional performance, with the outcomes achieved comparable to those of primary TKA. High levels of function can be achieved following revision knee arthroplasty, which may be important considering the changing need for, and demographics of, revision surgery.

Background: Several factors can alter a cements viscosity and hence it’s handling characteristics. An in vitro study was performed to ascertain whether anecdotal observations of differences in handling between batches of the same cement brand existed.

Methods: 3 batches of Simplex P Tobramycin (SPT), Refobacin Bone Cement (RBC), SmartSet GHV (SSG) and Palacos R+G (PRG) were tested. 6 replicates of each batch were vacuum mixed and their viscosity in relation to time was measured in laboratory conditions (50 ±5% humidity and 23 ±1°C) using a rheometer. 6 replicates of each batch had their handling characteristics examined after they were hand mixed in theatre conditions.

Results: Inter and intra-batch variability was seen in the viscosity of all brands of cements tested. Inter-batch calculations were influenced by high intra-batch viscosity variability. The viscosity of RBC cement was very similar to SSG, but significantly different to PRG (p = 0.01 at 5N and p = 0.009 at 40 N).

Interpretation: Our results suggest that in clinical practice extrinsic factors such as preparation conditions and methods probably play a more important role than the cements intrinsic variability. However, variability in handling and viscosity will exist in all brands of cement prepared in theatre conditions and the surgeon needs to be aware why they may act differently.

Introduction: An intra-medullary cement restrictor is an integral part of modern cementing technique in total hip arthroplasty. Failure of the restrictor to contain cement, flawed surgical technique or dislocation of the restrictor during pressurisation can all result in a deficient cement mantle. A radiographic analysis of hip replacements using a biodegradable restrictor was undertaken to determine the incidence of restrictor failure, the influence of femoral canal morphology on restrictor failure and to describe the cement mantle quality in successful and failed distal cement restriction.

Methods: x-rays from 299 consecutive hip replacements using the amberflex restrictor were analysed. The cortical index, canal-calcar ratio and femoral type, according to Dorr, were recorded. 3 modes of restrictor failure were identified:

Cement leakage –cement was seen to have escaped past the cement restrictor

Results: 84 cases of restrictor failure were observed – 44 dislocations, 24 leakages and 16 penetrations. The mode of failure was not correlated with femoral type, cortical index or canal-calcar ratio. A strong association was found between restrictor failure and grades c and d cement mantles using the chi squared test. A correlation between cortical index, canal-calcar ratio and femoral type was not observed.

Discussion: The ability of a cement restrictor to occlude the femoral canal and resist pressurisation is very important if a good quality cement mantle is to be achieved. Technical error was likely to be an important factor in many of the observed cases of restrictor failure, especially penetrative failure. Surgical technique is more important than femoral morphology in determining the successful use of this restrictor.

Aim: The aim of this study was to look at the presenting features, histological grade, size of primary tumour, method of treatment and patient and doctor delays in upper extremity Ewing sarcoma to observe the effects on local recurrence, metastasis and survival.

Methods: 19 patients with upper extremity Ewing sarcoma were identified using the Scottish Bone Tumour Registry which carries clinical, pathological and radiological data on the majority of bone tumours diagnosed in Scotland over the past 50 years.

Results: With increasing tumour Enneking grade at presentation there was a significantly higher mortality (X2=8.0606, p=0.0178). Patients with a higher grade also had an increased trend towards local recurrence (X2=5.1154, p=0.0775). Grade did not seem to influence the occurrence of metastasis. Patients with larger tumours tended to have a higher mortality (50% vs 27% dead at 5 years). All patients presented clinically with pain and all but two complained of some sort of swelling. It was found that there was a trend towards a higher grade in patients presenting with a longer duration of symptoms (X2=4.6269,p=0.0989). No difference in survival was noted between patients undergoing surgery and chemotherapy and patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Disease-free survival was 100% at both 5 and 10 years for Enneking Grade IIA, 56% at 5 and 10 years for Grade IIB and 0% at 5 years for Grade III.

Conclusions: This study re-emphasises the importance of a delay in diagnosis on outcome. Longer symptom duration results in a higher histological grade at presentation. In turn a higher presenting grade is associated with a higher mortality. In agreement with other studies a larger primary tumour correlates with a poorer outcome. Outcomes in terms of survival are comparable for groups treated with adjuvant radiotherapy or surgery.