The decision to choose CR (cruciate retaining) insert or CS (condylar stabilized) insert during TKA remains a controversial issue. Triathlon CS type has a condylar stabilized insert with an increased anterior lip that can be used in cases where the PCL is sacrificed but a PS insert is not used. The difference of the knee kinematics remains unclear. This study measured knee kinematics of deep knee flexion under load in two insert designs using 2D/3D registration technique. Five fresh-frozen cadaver lower extremity specimens were surgically implanted with Triathlon CR components (Stryker Orthopedics, Mahwah, NJ). CR insert with retaining posterior cruciate ligament were measured firstly, and then CS insert after sacrificing posterior cruciate ligament were measured. Under fluoroscopic surveillance, the knees were mounted in a dynamic quadriceps-driven closed-kinetic chain knee simulator based on the Oxford knee rig design. The data of every 10° knee flexion between 0° and 140° were corrected. Femorotibial motion including tibial polyethylene insert were analyzed using 2D/3D registration technique, which uses computer-assisted design (CAD) models to reproduce the spatial position of the femoral, tibial components from single-view fluoroscopic images. We evaluated the knee flexion angle, femoral axial rotation, and anteroposterior translation of contact points.Background
Materials and methods
Various postoperative evaluations using fluoroscopy have reported in vivo knee flexion kinematics under weight bearing conditions. This method has been used to investigate which design features are more important for restoring normal knee function. The objective of this study is to evaluate the kinematics of a Low Contact Stress total knee arthroplasty (LCS TKA) in weight bearing deep knee flexion using 2D/3D registration technique. We investigated the in vivo knee kinematics of 6 knees (4 patients) implanted with the LCS meniscal bearing TKA (LCS Mobile-Bearing Knee System, Depuy, Warsaw, IN). Mean period between operation and surveillance was 170.7±14.2 months. Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient did a deep knee flexion under weight-bearing condition. Femorotibial motion was analyzed using 2D/3D registration technique, which uses computer-assisted design (CAD) models to reproduce the spatial position of the femoral, tibial components from single-view fluoroscopic images. We evaluated the knee flexion angle, femoral axial rotation, and antero-posterior translation of contact positions.Background
Patients and methods
The outcome after total knee arthroplasty is influenced by the postoperative orientation of the component. For accurate implantation, the surgeon performs a three dimensional preoperative planning and performs the surgery with reference to the anatomical bony landmarks. However, the assessment of orientation after TKA is generally performed on two dimensional radiographs. Despite the accurate implantation, radiographic assessment may not able to accurately evaluate the orientation of the component. CT images obtain a three dimensional information after TKA, but reliable identification of the anatomical bony landmarks remains the problem due to artifacts of metal components. In this study, we evaluate the three dimensional orientation of the component relative to the bone axis of anatomical landmarks using pre- and post-operative CT scanning. Two knees after primary TKA were assessed by one observer using preoperative and postoperative CT images. 3D models of pre-operative bone and post-operative bone with the exclusion of component data were constructed. Surface-based registration was performed by independently implementing the iterative closest point algorithm with the least-squares method to match the pre-operative bone model with the post-operative bone model. 3D surface model of the metal component from postoperative CT images was constructed. 3D surface model of the metal component was superimposed on original computer-aided design (CAD) data of the component using surface-based registration. The registration of the metal component was performed three times. Intra-observer reliability of the superimposed CAD models was evaluated. The orientation of the component was measured in INTRODUCTION
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Various postoperative evaluations using fluoroscopy have reported in vivo knee flexion kinematics under weight bearing conditions. This method has been used to investigate which design features are more important for restoring normal knee function. The objective of this study is to evaluate the kinematics of a Posterior-Stabilized TKA in weight bearing deep knee flexion using 2D/3D registration technique. We investigated the in vivo knee kinematics of 9 knees (9 patients) implanted with a Posterior Stabilized TKA (Triathlon PS, Stlyker Orthopedics, Mahwah, NJ). Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient did a deep knee flexion under weight-bearing condition. Femorotibial motion including tibial polyethylene insert were analyzed using 2D/3D registration technique, which uses computer-assisted design (CAD) models to reproduce the spatial position of the femoral, tibial components from single-view fluoroscopic images. We evaluated the knee flexion angle, femoral axial rotation, antero-posterior translation of contact points, and post-cam engagement were evaluated.Background
Patients and methods
Mobile-bearing (MB) total knee prostheses have been developed to achieve lower contact stress and higher conformity compared to fixed-bearing total knee prostheses. However, little is known about the in vivo kinematics of MB prostheses especially the motion of the polyethylene insert (PE) during various daily performances. And the in vivo motion of the PE during stairs up and down has not been clarified. The objective of this study is to clarify the in vivo motion of MB total knee arthroplasty including the PE during stairs up and down. We investigated the in vivo knee kinematics of 11 knees (10 patients) implanted with PFC-Sigma RP-F (DePuy). Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient did stairs up and down motion. And motion between each component was analyzed using two- to three-dimensional registration technique, which used computer-assisted design (CAD) models to reproduce the spatial position of the femoral, tibial components, and PE (implanted with four tantalum beads intra-operatively) from single-view fluoroscopic images. We evaluated the range of motion between the femoral and tibial components during being grounded, axial rotation between the femoral component and PE, the femoral and tibial component, and the PE and tibial component during being grounded.Background
Patients and methods
Mobile-bearing (MB) total knee prostheses have been developed to achieve lower contact stress and higher conformity compared to fixed-bearing total knee prostheses. However, little is known about the in vivo kinematics of MB prostheses especially about the kinematics of polyethylene insert (PE). In vivo motion of PE during squatting still remains unclear. The objective of this study is to investigate the in vivo motion of MB total knee arthroplasty including PE during squatting. We investigated the in vivo knee kinematics of 11 knees (10 patients) implanted with Vanguard Rotationg Platform High Flex (Biomet(r)). Under fluoroscopic surveillance, each patient did a wight-bearing deep knee bending motion. Motion between each component was analyzed using two- to three-dimensional registration technique, which uses computer-assisted design (CAD) models to reproduce the spatial position of the femoral, tibial components, and PE (implanted with five tantalum beads intra-operatively) from single-view fluoroscopic images. We evaluated the range of motion between the femoral and tibial components, axial rotation between the femoral component and PE, the femoral and tibial component, and the PE and tibial component, and AP translation of the nearest point between the femoral and tibial component and between the femoral component and PE.Background
Patients and methods
Recently mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has become more popular. However, the advantages of mobile bearing (MB) PS TKA still remain unclear especially from a kinematic point of view. The objective of this study was to investigate the difference and advantage in kinematics of mobile baring PS TKA compared with fixed bearing (FB) PS TKA. Femorotibial nearest positions for 19 subjects (20 knees), 10 knees implanted with NexGen Legacy flex (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN)with mobile bearing PS TKA, and 10 knees implanted with NexGen Legacy flex (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN)with fixed bearing PS TKA were analyzed using the sagittal plane fluoroscopic images. All the knees were implanted by a single surgeon. All the subjects performed weight bearing deep knee bending motion. We evaluated range of motion, axial rotation of the femoral component, AP translation of medial and lateral sides. The average range of motion between femoral component and tibial component was 119°±18° in MB and 122°±10 ° in FB. The axial rotation of the femoral component was 11.8°±6.2° in MB and 11.8°±4.9° in FB. There was no significant difference both in range of motion and axial rotation between MB and FB. The AP translation of MB and FB showed same patterns. They were rollback in early flexion, the lateral pivot pattern (the medial condyle moved forward significantly compared with the lesser amount of AP translation for the lateral condyle) at mid flexion, and bicondylar rollback at deep flexion. The rollback in early flexion was 3.4mm in MB and 1.8mm in FB at medial side, 4.2mm in MB and 4.8mm in FB at lateral side. There was no significant difference. The lateral pivot pattern, which moved anteriorly, was 7.8mm in MB and 7.0mm in FB at medial side, 3.0mm in MB and 2.4mm in FB at lateral side. There was no significant difference. The bicondylar rollback at deep flexion was 6.4mm in MB and 7.7mm in FB at medial side, 6.9mm in MB and 4.8mm in FB at lateral side. In four subjects, more than 12°axial rotation was observed in knees implanted with FB TKA which allows only 12°axial rotation. The results in this study demonstrate that there was no significant difference in kinematics of weight bearing deep knee bending motion between MB and FB. The advantage of MB is allowance of axial rotation which restricted until 12° in FB NexGen Legacy flex PS TKA.
