Constrained condylar knee (CCK) prosthesis offers an implant option for complex revision total knee arthroplasties in which stable varus-valgus constraint as well as rotational control is needed for severe bone defect and ligament insufficiency. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of CCK prosthesis in revision TKA.

Fify-one revision TKAs performed using CCK prosthesis between Jan. 1998 and Feb. 2006 were performed. The mean follow-up period was 5 years and 3 months (2 to 9 years) and the interval between initial and revision TKA was 8 years (4 months to 21 years). The mean age was 67 years. Range of motion (ROM), knee society (KS) score, hospital for special surgery (HSS) score, complication rate and failure rate was evaluated. The tibiofemoral angle and radiolucent line was also evaluated on plain radiograph.

The mean ROM improved from 81.9° to 102°. The mean KS score improved from 49.3° to 79.7°, and KS function score from 50.3 to 71.0 (P< .001). The mean HSS score improved from 50.7 to 78.7 (P< .001). Tibiofemoral angle improved from valgus 3.1° to valgus 5.6° (P< .001). Radiolucent line more than 2mm was observed around 4 femoral and 4 tibial components. Complications including 1 skin necrosis, 1 tibial tubercle nonunion, 2 infections, 3 periprosthetic fractures and 5 arthrofibrosis were observed. Overall rating was excellent or good in 88% at the last follow up.

Revision TKA using CCK prosthesis showed comparable results with other reports in average 5 years follow-up.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the rotational axis of the tibia and the association of its axis to tibial coronal alignment after TKR.

TKRs were performed using navigated mobile bearing system (40 knees), conventional mobile bearing (48 knees) and conventional fixed bearing (40 knees) and preoperative and postoperative CT scans were assessed using 3D image reconstruction-analysis program. The tibial AP axis which was defined as the line connecting the middle of the PCL and the medial edge of the patellar tendon attachment was measured relative to the AP axis of distal femur preoperatively and postoperatively, as well as the coronal angle of the tibia and posterior slope. The tibial coronal alignments in navigation, postoperative plain radiograph and CT were compared.

The AP axis of the tibia was in 2.10° internally rotated position relative to the AP axis of the femur preoperatively and 3.54° postoperatively (range, 19.5° internal rotation to 16.8° external rotation). The coronal angle of the tibia was 0.46° varus on plain radiograph, 0.72° varus on CT, 0.37° valgus in navigation (p=0.005). Posterior slope was 2.53° on plain radiograph and 0.67° in navigation (p< 0.001). There was no correlation between postoperative rotational position of the tibia relative to the femur and the difference in the tibial coronal angle between navigation data and CT.

The proposed anteroposterior axis of the tibia centered between 0 to 5 degrees internally rotated position relative to the femur but showed wide range of deviation. The rotation angle of the tibial cutting in navigated TKR did not influence on the postoperative measurement discrepancy between navigation and CT.

In a previous study, we found that pre-TKA patients were severely disabled in high-flexion activities but perceived these disabilities as being no more important than pain relief and the restoration of daily routine activities. This study was conducted to investigate functional disabilities and patient satisfaction in Korean patients after TKA.

Of 387 patients who had undergone TKA with a follow-up longer than 12 months, 270 (69.7%) completed a questionnaire designed to evaluate functional disabilities, perceived importance and patient satisfaction.

The top 5 severe functional disabilities were difficulties in kneeling, squatting, sitting with legs crossed, sexual activity, and recreational activities. The top 5 in order of perceived importance were difficulties in walking, using a bathtub, working, climbing stairs, and recreation activities. Severities of functional disabilities were not found to be correlated with perceived importance. The patients (8.5%) dissatisfied with their replaced knees had more severe functional disabilities than the satisfied for most activities. The dissatisfied patients tended to perceive functional disabilities in high-flexion activities to be more important than the satisfied.

This study indicates that despite severe disabilities in high-flexion activities, most Korean patients after TKA would not consider high-flexion disability to be more important than other daily routine activities. Moreover, postoperative high-flexion disabilities would not adversely influence satisfaction for most patients. Nevertheless, such disabilities are likely to cause dissatisfaction among those that are not prepared to modify their traditional life-styles.

The aim of this study was to evaluate passive kinematics of a mobile-bearing, ultracongruent (UC) total knee design compared with a mobile-bearing, posterior stabilised (PS) design intraoperatively using navigation system.

Thirty-four knees of 24 patients which had undergone total knee arthroplasty with UC prosthesis (E-motion^®, Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) for primary osteoarthritis and fifteen knees of 14 patients with PS prosthesis (E-motion^®) were included in this study. Thirty-one female and seven male patients were included and the mean age was 70.4 years. Patients were followed up for 7.26 months (6 to 12 months). Intraoperative kinematics including valgus/varus rotation, internal/external rotation, and anterior/posterior translation was assessed from 10° to 120° of passive flexion before and after total knee replacement using a surgical navigation system (Orthopilot^®, Aesculap). The range of motion (ROM) was measured preoperatively and at the final follow up.

The tibiofemoral alignment in 10° flexion changed from varus 5.85° to valgus 0.38° in UC group and changed from varus 7.45° to valgus 1.08° in PS group (p> 0.05), the magnitude of varus rotation during flexion was 0.01° in UC group and 4.08° in PS group (p< 0.05). PS knee showed the tendency to slight varus alignment during flexion but UC knee showed the tendency toward valgus alignment fter midflexion. The mean internal rotation during flexion was 10.3° in UC group and 13.2° in PS group (p> 0.05). The translation of the femur was 4.99mm posteriorly in UC group and 3.24mm posteriorly in PS group at 120° flexion (p> 0.05). The maximum flexion angle at the final follow up was 123° in UC group and 118° in PS group (p> 0.05). Total knee arthroplasty with high flexion PS prosthesis showed good ROM and satisfactory early clinical results.

UC total knee design showed less varus rotation during flexion, more valgus pattern in higher flexion angle than PS design, similar internal rotation angle and pattern, and similar posterior translation at 120° flexion with PS design.

Clinical experience has shown the needs for high flexion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of a fixed bearing high flexion posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Between July 2001 and December 2005, 422 TKAs in 288 patients were performed with high flexion PS prosthesis and 378 knees of 258 patients had been followed up for 2 to 6.5 years (mean: 3 years 11 months). We evaluated range of motion (ROM), Knee rating system of the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) and Knee Society (KS) score, and radiological results.

The mean flexion improved from 110.1 degrees to 126.7 degrees at the latest follow-up. 333 knees (88 %) showed more than 120 degrees of flexion, 105 knees (28 %) more than 140 degrees of flexion. The mean KS clinical score improved from 39 to 93 points (p< 0.01) and KS function score, from 40 to 85.4 points (p< 0.01). The mean HSS score improved from 41.2 to 86.3 points (p< 0.01). In 28 knees, radiolucent line of 1–2 mm in width was observed at zone 1 without symptoms. Aseptic loosening in 4 knees, Mid-flexion instability in 2 knees, superficial infection in 3 knees and deep infection in 3 knees were observed.

Total knee arthroplasty with high flexion PS prosthesis showed good ROM and satisfactory early clinical results. Complication rate was similar to those of other series. Close observation and serial radiological evaluation are needed for long term results.

Despite the well-documented improvement in coronal alignment achieved by computer assisted navigation, varying results have been reported for sagittal alignment. Current navigation systems rely on a sagittal femoral mechanical axis identified by the navigation system, but little information is available on the relationship between the sagittal mechanical axis and anatomical axes for intra-operative or postoperative radiographic assessments. We asked whether deviations exist between sagittal femoral mechanical axis and anatomical axes and attempted to identify predictors of the deviations found.

In 100 consecutive patients (200 knees) undergoing TKA, angles between two anatomical axes (the anterior cortical line and mid-medullary line) and two sagittal mechanical axes identified by current navigation systems were measured as proxies of the deviations between them on true lateral radiographs of the whole femur. Correlation analyses and multivariate regression were carried out to identify predictors of deviations.

Significant deviations existed with wide ranges between the anatomical axes and the sagittal mechanical axes. Degree of femoral bowing and femoral length were found to be predictors of deviations between sagittal femoral mechanical axes and anatomical axes.

This study suggests that surgeons applying navigation technology to TKA need to consider deviations between the sagittal femoral mechanical axes and anatomical axes when they intend to place a femoral component at a target sagittal orientation with respect to an anatomical reference.

Application of computer assisted navigation (CAN) has been documented to improve the accuracy of limb alignment and implant positioning. However, a recent study reported that a great deal of disparities occurred between the radiographic and navigational measurements calling the basic argument for application of CAN to TKA into question. In the authors’ practice using CAN for TKA, we have observed consistent disparities between the preoperative radiographic assessments and intraoperative navigational assessments of limb alignment in the coronal plane. A large disparity between radiographic and navigational assessments of limb alignment would be presenting a challenging question whether or not the surgeon can rely on the information provided by the CAN system. We developed a novel method to measure the coronal limb alignment and have found that the radiographic measurements with the novel method remarkably reduce the disparities between the radiographic and navigational assessments of the coronal limb alignment. This study was conducted to document the existence of the disparities between the radiographic and navigational assessments of the limb alignment and the value of our novel method to perform preoperative radiographic measurements of limb alignment.

In 107 TKAs performed using a CAN system (Ortho-pilot: B. Braun-Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany), radiographic assessments of coronal limb alignment were assessed using preoperative and postoperative whole limb radiographs taken with weight bearing with two different methods: a standard method, angle between the femoral mechanical axis (the line connecting hip center and the top pint of the femoral intercondylar notch) and a tibial mechanical axis (the line connecting the mid-point between the medial and lateral tibial eminences and the mid-point of the talus dome) and a novel method, the angle between the weight loading line (the line connecting the hip center and the mid-point of the talus dome) and the tibial mechanical axis. A negative value was given to a varus alignment and a positive value to the valgus alignment. During surgery, the coronal limb alignment was measured by the navigation system two different time-points: after registration and after implantation of prostheses. The disparity between the radiographic and navigational assessments was calculated with subtracting the radiographic assessments by the navigational assessments.

The disparity between the radiographic and navigational assessments was significantly smaller with the novel method than with the standard method. The mean difference between the radiographic and navigational assessments of preoperative limb alignment was −6.5o (range: −19 ~ 1) with the standard method and −0.9o (range: −8o to 4o) with the novel method. The mean difference between the radiographic and navigational assessments of the postoperative limb alignment was −1.96 (range: −11 ~ 3) with the standard method and −1.3 (range: −6 ~3).

This study documents that a wide range of disparities occurs between the radiographic and navigational assessments of limb alignment and the amount of disparity occurs in preoperative assessments. Our findings indicate that our novel method to perform the radiographic assessments of limb alignment can be a useful tool to interpret the information intraoperatively given by the navigation system.