Measuring the the angle of external rotation of the tibial component preop helped to determine the extent of external rotation of the tibial component intraoperatively. A significant decrease of the postop Q angle was noticed in all patients.
A strict radiological and CT evaluation was done prior to and following the surgery and accompanied the clinical evaluation and follow up. A cohort of 32 patients is presented in details regarding the imaging pre-operative planning and the post-operative results. The radiological data included: 1. Angle of frontal deformity; 2. Angle of instability; 3. Fi-Fc – distance from the tip of the fibular head to the distal part of the lateral femoral condyle; 4. Frontal inclination angle of tibial component; 5. Frontal inclination angle of femoral component; 6. Sagital posterior inclination of tibial component; 7. Sagital posterior inclination angle of the femoral component; 8. The distance from the patella to the knee center of motion. The computed tomography data included: 1. The actual dimensions of the patella, tibia and femur; 2. The preoperative angle between the posterior condylar line and anterior condylar line; 3. The angle between the posterior condylar line and the trans-epicondylar line; 4. The angle of external rotation of the femoral component; 5. The angle of external rotation of the tibial component; 6. The distance of lateralization of the femoral and tibial components.
Measuring the angle of external rotation of the tibial component preop helped to determine the extent of external rotation of the tibial component intraoperatively. A significant decrease of the postop Q angle was noticed in all patients.
In all cases, revision was performed for mechanical loosening of one or several components. Using light microscopy, the articulating surface of each patella component was analyzed for six modes of damage: polishing, delaminating, surface deformation due to cold flow, scratching, pitting and abrasion. To describe the damage, the surface of the patella component was divided into four sections. The contact stresses between the patellar and femoral components were calculated in relation to the areas of wear. Volumetric wear could not be accurately established.
Four modes of damage were observed: polishing in 13, delimitation in 12, cold flow in 6 and scratching in 3. The median total area of polyethylene damage was for polishing 76.5%, delimitation 70.6%, cold flow 35.3% and scratching 17.6%. The average contact stress on the nonconforming Total Condylar patella component was 12.9 Kgf/mm2. It was significantly higher (p<
0.002) than the average contact stress on the conforming Kinematic patellar component – 2.9 Kgf/mm2. The area of wear was smaller, 357.2 mm2 for the nonconforming Total Condylar, than for the conforming Kinematic patella 439.2 mm2. However, this difference was not statistically significant. The average weight of the patients with the Kinematic knee (74.5 kg) was higher as compared to the patients with Total Condylar knee (66 kg) but the difference was not significant.
The imaging parameters that were collected from patient X-rays were: radiolucent line, osteolysis, subsidence, cortical hypertrophy, cortical thinning, undersizing, distal pod, rounded calcar, cupping and sagging.
No sign of loosening were observed in any patient, 23 stems were implanted in neutral position, 2 stems in valgus and 6 in varus position. In 15 patients stem was undersized. In 23 patients distal pod was observed, 19 patients had trochanteric osteopenia, in 10 patients cupping was noticed and in 6 patients cortical thinning was observed. Five patients showed proximal osteopenia and in 5 patients sagging of few millimeters was noticed during the first years after surgery. No radiolucent line, osteolysis, subsidence and cortical hypertrophy were observed up to 11 years follow-up.
All were treated by retrograde intramedullary nailing. The surgical procedure was done closed or open by insertion of a retrograde intramedullary nail. Distal interlocking was achieved by two transversal screws. Clinical and radiological follow-up was performed during the first year after operation.
The follow-up period was 6–18 months with an average follow-up period of 13 months. All patients were treated with ESWT. One to three treatment sessions were provided to each patient with an interval of one week between the sessions. After all sessions were finished, pain and function were reassessed in the same method that was used before the beginning of the treatment. The overall mean pain value was 1.96 before the treatment and 5.92 after the treatment. 8 patients (30.7%) reported no pain at all after the treatment and in 6 patients (23%) a significant improvement in pain was achieved. 7 patients (19%) reported of only slight relief of pain and 4 patients (15.4%) reported no change in pain level. Only in one patient (3.9%) worsening of the pain was observed. The overall mean function capacity was 5.76 before the treatment and 8.65 after the treatment. 11 patients (42%) returned to full functional capacity and in 7 patients (27%) a significant improvement in functional capacity was observed. In 8 patients (30.7%) no change in the functional capacity was noticed. Good results of improvement in pain severity and functional capacity were observed in cases of plantar fasciitis and tennis elbow.