To evaluate how abnormal proximal femoral anatomy affects different femoral version measurements in young patients with hip pain. First, femoral version was measured in 50 hips of symptomatic consecutively selected patients with hip pain (mean age 20 years (SD 6), 60% (n = 25) females) on preoperative CT scans using different measurement methods: Lee et al, Reikerås et al, Tomczak et al, and Murphy et al. Neck-shaft angle (NSA) and α angle were measured on coronal and radial CT images. Second, CT scans from three patients with femoral retroversion, normal femoral version, and anteversion were used to create 3D femur models, which were manipulated to generate models with different NSAs and different cam lesions, resulting in eight models per patient. Femoral version measurements were repeated on manipulated femora.Aims
Methods
The frequency of severe femoral retroversion is unclear in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). This study aimed to investigate mean femoral version (FV), the frequency of absolute femoral retroversion, and the combination of decreased FV and acetabular retroversion (AR) in symptomatic patients with FAI subtypes. A retrospective institutional review board-approved observational study was performed with 333 symptomatic patients (384 hips) with hip pain due to FAI evaluated for hip preservation surgery. Overall, 142 patients (165 hips) had cam-type FAI, while 118 patients (137 hips) had mixed-type FAI. The allocation to each subgroup was based on reference values calculated on anteroposterior radiographs. CT/MRI-based measurement of FV (Murphy method) and AV were retrospectively compared among five FAI subgroups. Frequency of decreased FV < 10°, severely decreased FV < 5°, and absolute femoral retroversion (FV < 0°) was analyzed.Aims
Methods
The effect of pelvic tilt (PT) and sagittal balance in hips with pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with acetabular retroversion (AR) is controversial. It is unclear if patients with AR have a rotational abnormality of the iliac wing. Therefore, we asked: are parameters for sagittal balance, and is rotation of the iliac wing, different in patients with AR compared to a control group?; and is there a correlation between iliac rotation and acetabular version? A retrospective, review board-approved, controlled study was performed including 120 hips in 86 consecutive patients with symptomatic FAI or hip dysplasia. Pelvic CT scans were reviewed to calculate parameters for sagittal balance (pelvic incidence (PI), PT, and sacral slope), anterior pelvic plane angle, pelvic inclination, and external rotation of the iliac wing and were compared to a control group (48 hips). The 120 hips were allocated to the following groups: AR (41 hips), hip dysplasia (47 hips) and cam FAI with normal acetabular morphology (32 hips). Subgroups of total AR (15 hips) and high acetabular anteversion (20 hips) were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction.Aims
Methods
Torsional deformities are increasingly recognized as an additional factor in young patients with hip pain resulting from pincer- and cam-deformities. For example decreased femoral torsion can worsen an anterior Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) conflict while an increased torsion can be beneficial with the same configuration. It is unknown how often torsional deformities are present in young patients presenting with hip pain that are eligible for joint preserving surgery. We questioned (1) what is the prevalence of a pathological femoral torsion in hips with FAI or hip dysplasia? (2) which hip disorders are associated with an abnormal torsion? An IRB-approved retrospective study of 463 consecutive symptomatic FAI patients (538 hips) and a MRI or CT scan on which femoral torsion could be measured was performed (‘study group'). Out of 915 MRI we excluded 377 hips. The study group was divided into 11 groups: Dysplasia (< 22° LCE), retroversion, anteverted hips, overcoverage (LCE angle 36–39°), severe overcoverage (LCE>39°), cam (>50° alpha angle), mixed FAI, varus- (<125° CCD angle), valgus- (>139° CCD), Perthes-hips and hips with no obvious pathology. The ‘control group' of normal hips consisted of 35 patients (35 hips) without radiographic signs of osteoarthritis or hip pain wich was used for a previous study. Femoral antetorsion was measured according to Tönnis et al. as the angle between the axis of the femoral neck and the posterior axis of the femoral condyles. Normal femoral torsion was defined by Tönnis et al. as angles 10–25° while decreased resp. increased torsion was defined as <5° and >25°. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variances (ANOVA).Introduction
Methods
Delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) is a novel MRI-based technique with intravenous contrast agent that allows an objective quantification of biochemical cartilage properties. It enables a ‘monitoring' of the loss of cartilage glycosaminoglycan content which ultimately leads to osteoarthritis. Data regarding the longitudinal change of cartilage property after joint preserving hip surgery is sparse. We asked (1) if and how the dGEMRIC-index changes in patients undergoing open/arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) one year postoperatively compared to a control group of patients with non-operative treatment; (2) and if a change correlates with the clinical short term outcome. IRB-approved prospective comparative longitudinal study of two groups involving a total of 61 hips in 55 symptomatic patients with FAI. The ‘operative' group consisted of patients that underwent open/arthroscopic treatment of their pathomorphology. The ‘non-operative' group consisted of conservatively treated patients. Groups were comparable for preoperative radiographic arthritis (Tönnis score), preoperative HOOS- and WOMAC-scores and baseline dGEMRIC indices. All patients eligible for evaluation had preoperative radiographs and dGEMRIC scans at baseline and repeated dGEMRIC scans using the same scanner and protocol. (1) dGEMRIC indices of femoral and acetabular cartilage were assessed separately on the initial and follow-up dGEMRIC scans. Radial images were reformatted from a 3D T1 map for measurements. Regions of interest were placed manually peripherally and centrally within the cartilage based on anatomical landmarks at the 12 ‘hour' position of the clcok-face with the help of radial high-resolution PD-weighted MR images. (2) Patient-reported outcome was evaluated at baseline and at 1 year follow-up: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Statistical analysis included Student's t-Tests, Mann-Whitney U-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (p<0.05).Objectives
Methods
