The frequent choice of treatment for tibial shaft fractures is intramedullary nailing. However there are cases where this treatment is problematic and alternative treatments are chosen with satisfied results.

Twenty-nine patients with complex, unstable tibial shaft fractures (13 males and 16 females) aged 18 to 76 years (mean age 49 years) were treated using Ilizarov external fixation, the last decade in our Department by the same surgeon. The indications were open Gustillo III fractures, comminuted fractures of the proximal or distal third tibia near metaphysis, concomitant plateau or pillon fractures and fractures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). All frames were applied the first day of injury. Patients without concomitant intraarticular fracture or bone deficit allowed to full weight bearing within2 weeks after surgery.

Union and good to excellent alignment with full range of motion in the knee and ankle joints was obtained in all patients. Three patients needed bone lengthening using the initial applied frame after corticotomy in second operation. There were 7 delayed unions in fractures without bone deficit, 10 superficial pin tract infection treated with antibiotics and local care and 1 deep infection which needed surgical intervention.

Ilizarov external fixation gives the solution in difficult and problematic tibial shaft fractures and allows early weight bearing

Treatment of tibial plateau fractures Schatzker type V and VI or with soft tissues injuries is still remains under discussion. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of treatment with circular frame and closed reduction in 25 patients (15 males and 10 females) with tibial plateau fractures, with a mean age of 42 years old (20 – 76 years).

Five fractures were classified as Schatzker type II and III and 20 as type V and VI. Reduction was obtained in 22 cases under foot traction and in 3 arthroscopically. Bone grafts inserted through a hole (• 1 cm) in the inner cortex of the tibia metaphysis under fluoroscopy. Eight unstable knees needed bridging the joint for 4 weeks. In 2 cases a cannulated interfragmentary screw was used. Full weight bearing was allowed 3 months after injury when the device was removed.

Follow up ranged from 1 to 10 years (mean 5 years). All fractures were united and there was no infection. Full range of the knee motion was achieved in 23 patients while 2 needed an open arthrolysis. There were 2 malunions which were treated with one valgus osteotomy and one TKR. Asymptomatic arthritis appeared in 6 patients. According to Knee Society Score (KSS) the results were classified as excellent in 12, good in 8, fair in 3 and poor in 2 patients.

Circular frames are a satisfactory alternative method for the treatment of tibial plateau fractures either in severe soft tissues injuries or in very complex cases

Introduction: the choice of treatment for tibial shaft fractures in adults is intramedullary nailing. However there are cases where this treatment is problematic and alternative treatments are chosen.

Patients and Methods: 29 patients with unstable tibial shaft fractures (13 males and 16 females; aged 18 to 76 years) were treated using Ilizarov technique, last decade, by the authors. The indications were open fractures type III Gustillo, comminuted fractures of the proximal or distal third near metaphysis, concomitant plateau or pillon fractures and fractures after TNR. All frames were applied the first day of injury. Patients without concomitant intraarticular fracture or bone deficit allowed to full weight bearing within two weeks after surgery.

Results: union and good to excellent alignment with full range of motion in the knee and ankle joints was obtained in all patients. Three patients needed bone lengthening using the initial applied frame after corticotomy in second operation. There were 7 delayed unions in fractures without bone deficit. As complications there were superficial pin tract infection in 10 patients treated with antibiotics and local care and one deep infection which needed surgical intervention.

Conclusions: Ilizarov technique gives the solution in difficult and problematic tibial shaft fractures and allows early weight bearing.

Purpose: The floating knee injuries are rare injuries and have severe complications. There is controversy in the literature regarding the gold standard of treatment. We present our experience treating 25 patients with this type of injury.

Materials and Methods: There were 23 males and 2 females, aged 18 to 65 years, with a mean ISS (injury severity score) 25 (ranged, 18 to 45). All patients were operated the day of admission. Based on Letts’ classification there were 8 fractures type A, 6 type B, 7 type C, and 4 type D. The management in type A and B in non polytrauma patients was external fixation of the tibia followed by intramedullary nail of the femur, while in type C and D external fixation of the femur followed by external or internal fixation of the tibia.

Results: The mean follow-up was 4 years (ranged 1–7 years). One patient died before the completion of the therapy. Fracture union was accomplished to all the patients. Three patients were reoperated for nonunion or malunion of the femur and one for nonunion of the tibia. There was no infection. The main complication was the knee stiffness but it was resolved without a second operation. Two patients had pulmonary embolism and one fat embolism. The final results based on Karlstrom and Olerud criteria were excellent in 5 patients, good in 14 and fair in 5.

Conclusion: The treatment of the floating knee injuries is based on ISS and the Letts classification. In type A and B in non polytrauma patients, we believe that the best way of treatment is external fixation of the tibia followed by intramedullary nail of the femur.

PURPOSE: There is an argument in the literature regarding the use of intramedullary nail or the external fixation followed by intramedullary nail in tibial fractures with severe damage of soft tissues, threatened compartment syndrome, open type IIIA fractures and in polytrauma patients. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results of non-jointed external fixators as a definite treatment for these type of tibial shaft fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: 86 patients (91 tibial shaft fractures) were treated at the authors’ institute with a non-jointed external fixator. The mean patient age was 35 years (range, 15–80). There were 70 male and 16 female patients. The average time of surgery from the accident was 10 hours. The indications for application an external fixator was: severe damage of the soft tissues in 11 fractures, an incipient compartment syndrome in 12 fractures, open type III Gustilo fractures in 57, and 11 tibia fractures in polytrauma patients. According to AO classification 46 fractures were type A, 32 type B and 13 type C.

RESULTS: The average follow up was 2.9 years (ranged, 1–5 years). The average operative time was 50 min. Complications included: 3 non-unions, 5 delayed unions, 1 malunions, 1 tibia shortening, 3 superficial infections of soft tissues in open fractures, 26 pin infections and 1 osteomyelitis in open fractures. In 2 patients fat embolism was diagnosed while pulmonary embolism was a complication in 2 patients. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) developed in 5 patients. A re-operation was performed in 11 out of 91 fractures. Change of the method was necessary in 2 out of 91 fractures. The primary callus in 10 out of 91 fractures was due to the stiffness of the unilateral non-jointed external fixators and did not influence the final results. Mean time of fracture union for the open fractures that did not require change of the method nor bone graft was 25 weeks, while for the closed fractures was 18 weeks. The dynamization of the system and partial weight bearing was started at 6 weeks and all the patients had full weight bearing by the 12th week.

CONCLUSION: The unilateral external fixators were the definite treatment in 88 out of 91 fractures. The unilateral external fixators can be used as a definite treatment for tibial shaft fractures in the majority of the cases. Re-operation or change of the method is unusual and must be performed only when there is a delay in callus formation.