In a „true“ valgus knee the lateral femoral condyle is smaller in both the vertical and anteroposterior dimensions and lateral soft tissue structures are contracted. In a „false“ valgus knee there is no mismatch between anteroposterior dimensions of both condyles. The aim of the study was to preoperatively analyse patterns of passive movement of valgus knees with imageless navigation system to optimise surgical approach during subsequent total knee replacement (TKR).

TKR were prospectively performed in 50 valgus knees. After the data registration process, the kinematic analysis was performed by passive movement of the knee. The mechanical axis was recorded at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of flexion. The valgus deformity persistent through the whole range of motion was called „true“ and the valgus deformity passing into varus with flexion was called „false“.

The pre-operative valgus deformity in extension ranged from 13° to 4° (mean 7.8°). We observed „true“ valgus type deformity during passive range of movement in 34 cases (68%) and „false“ type of kinematics in 16 cases (32%). The average value of valgus deviation in extension in „true“ group was 7.9° (range 13° to 4°) and in „false“ group 7.5° (range 9° to 6°). The mean difference between axis deviation in 0° to 120° range of flexion was 5.5° (range 10° to 1°) in the „true“ valgus group. In the „false“ valgus group the varus deviation was observed in 90° of flexion in all cases and mean difference between axis deviation in 0° to 120° range of flexion was 12.0° (range 14° to 10°).

Computer navigation can easily help to identify the character of valgus deformity („true“ or „false“) just before skin incision. In „true“ valgus deviation lateral approach may be necessary for appropriate soft tissue balancing during TKR surgery.

Introduction: Large chronic tears of the supra and infraspinatus tendons lead to pain and dysfunction of the shoulder. If conservative treatment fails and repair is impossible, transfer of the latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle can be attempted to substitute for lost of supero-posterior cuff function.

Method: In 2003 nad 2004, twenty five patients with an average age of 54,8 years (range, 51 to 62 years) who had ongoing pain and impaired function underwent the LD transfer after ultrasonographic examination and diagnostic arthroscopy as a primary surgery. The patients were examined at an average of fourteen months (range, twelve to twenty six months) after the operation. The results were assessed with use of Constant-Murley score pre–and postoperatively.

Results: The mean Constant-Murley score increased from 32,50 points preoperatively to 78,75 points postoperatively. The mean score for pain improved of 8,75 points (from 3,75 to 12,50), activities of daily living improved of 10,00 points (from 6,00 to 16,00), range of motion of 15,00 points (from 14,00 to 29,00) and strengh improved of 11,50 points (from 8,75 to 21,25). 20 patients (80%) were very satisfied and 5 patients (20%) were satisfied. The postoperative pain relief was left as the predominant improvement. No patient was disappointed. All patients stated that they would have the operative procedure again under similar circumstances. There was only one complication – subcutaneous haematoma treated with revision and drainage.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that LD transfer is a reasonable approach for salvage of a massive tear of the supero-posterior rotator cuff. Despite the difficult operation technique and long rehabilitation phase, this procedure improves the subjective and objective findings.