An isolated avulsion fracture of the peroneus longus tendon is seldom seen and potentially can go undiagnosed using basic imaging methods during an initial emergency visit. If not managed appropriately it can lead to chronic pain, a reduced range of motions and eventually affect mobility. This article brings to light the effectiveness of managing such injuries conservatively. A 55 year old postman presented to clinic with pain over the instep of his right foot for 2 months with no history of trauma. Clinically the pain was confined to the right first metatarsophalangeal joint with occasional radiation to the calf. X-ray films did not detect any obvious bony injury. MR imaging revealed an ununited avulsion fracture of the base of the 1st metatarsal. The patient was subsequently injected with a mix of steroid and local anesthetic injections at the painful nonunion site under fluoroscopic guidance. Post procedure there was no neurovascular deficit. The patient was reviewed at three months and his pain score and functional outcome improved significantly. Moreover following our intervention, the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire reduced from 33 to 0. At the one year follow up he remained asymptomatic and was discharged. The peroneus longus tendon plays a role in eversion and planter flexion of foot along with providing stabilization to arches of foot. The pattern of injury to this tendon is based on two factors one is the mechanism of insult, if injured, and second is the variation in the insertion pattern of peroneus longus tendon itself. There is no gold standard treatments by which these injuries can be managed. If conservative management fails we must also consider surgery which involves percutaneous fixation, or excision of the non-healed fracture fragment and arthrodesis To conclude isolated avulsion fractures of peroneus longus tendon are rare injuries and it is important to raise awareness of this injury and the diagnostic and management challenges faced. In this case conservative management was a success in treating this injury however it is important to take factors such as patient selection, patient autonomy and clinical judgement into account before making the final decision.
Numerous procedures have been reported for the We wish to report a patient who had lengthening SCARF osteotomy for the metatarsalgia following previous She had a lengthening SCARF This case highlights that arthritis of the 1st MTPJ can occur in the absence of an AVN of the metatarsal head and patients need to be warned of this potential complaining when having the lengthening SCARF
Numerous techniques are used for the fusion of failed TAR. We wish to report our results of the revision of failed TAR to fusion. Between July 2005 and February 2011 the senior author had performed 20 The mean follow-up was 15 months. All 3 tibiotalar arthrodeses with screws alone fused successfully. Of the 13 patients where the fusion was augmented with an Ilizarov frame, 4 were done for septic loosening. There were 2 non unions of which one was stable without pain and the other required a further revision fusion with a frame and subsequently fused. Of the 9 patients who had a fusion with a frame for osteolysis and or aseptic loosening, there was one non union which was revised to a tibiotalocalacaneal fusion with a hind foot nail. The nail fractured at the level of the posterior oblique screw hole. The patient subsequently developed a relatively pain free non-union of the tibiotalar joint and not required further surgical intervention. The remaining 8 ankles fused at a mean of 5 months. The average time of frame removal was 17 weeks. There was four pin-site infection all of which settled with oral antibiotics. 5 patients had tibiotalocalacaneal fusion with a hind foot nail. The indication for the hind foot nail was significant osteolysis and loss of talar bone stock. The average shortening as a result of the fusion for the failed TAR was 1.5cms. Our results were comparable to the previous reports of arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement. We recommend the use of tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with a hind foot nail in the presence of severe osteolysis or accompanying subtalar arthritis. In the presence of good bone stock an ankle fusion supplemented with a circular frame gives a good predictable outcome.
Lisfranc injuries are not the common injuries of foot and ankle but there has been an increase in the incidence of these injuries due to road traffic accidents and fall from heights. We wish to present our retrospective case series of the operative management of the Lisfranc injuries by our senior author. We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with Lisfranc injuries who were managed operatively by the senior author over the last six years. The case note and the radiographs including the CT scans were reviewed. All of them were treated with open reduction and internal fixation within three weeks of injury. The male: female ratio was 43:25. 37 right: 31 left sided injuries. The average age was 40.6 years (range 16 – 81 years). The most common mechanism of injury was fall from steps at home followed by motor bike accident. They average follow-up was 19.5 months and they were assessed both clinically and radiographically at each follow-up. The k wires were removed at an average of six weeks. 96% were pain free and fully weight bearing after six months. Two patients had lateral scar tenderness. Majority of them returned to normal activities at an average of 12 months. Two patients had initial wound complications which were treated successfully with oral antibiotics. None of them had degenerative changes. Our results of early open reduction and internal fixation were comparable to the published literature.
To discover whether orthopaedic surgeons follow the BOA guidelines for secondary prevention of fragility fractures, a retrospective audit on neck of femur fractures treated in our hospital in October/November 2003 was carried out. There were 27 patients. Twenty-six patients (96%) had full blood count measured. LFT and bone-profile were measured in 18 patients (66%). Only nine patients (30%) had treatment for osteoporosis (calcium and vitamin D). Only one patient was referred for DEXA scan. Steps were taken to create better awareness of the BOA guidelines among junior doctors and nurse practitioners. In patients above 80 years of age it was decided to use abbreviated mental score above 7 as a clinical criterion for DEXA referral. A hospital protocol based on BOA guidelines was made. A re-audit was conducted during the period August-October 2004, with 37 patients. All of them had their full blood count and renal profile checked (100%). The bone-profile was measured in 28 (75.7%) and LFT in 34 (91.9%) patients. Twenty-four patients (65%) received treatment in the form of calcium + Vit D (20) and bisphosphonate (4). DEXA scan referral was not indicated in 14 patients as 4 of them were already on bisphosphonates and 10 patients had an abbreviated mental score of less than 7. Among the remaining 23 patients, nine (40%) were referred for DEXA scan. This improvement is statistically significant (p=0.03, chi square test). The re-audit shows that, although there is an improvement in the situation, we are still below the standards of secondary prevention of fragility fractures with 60% of femoral fragility fracture patients not being referred for DEXA scan. A pathway lead by a fracture liaison nurse dedicated to osteoporotic fracture patients should improve the situation.
We are presenting a prospective study of 25 patients with clavicle fracture treated with Rockwood Intramedullary pin fixation. Operative management is required for open fractures, neurovascular injury or compromise, displaced fractures with impending skin compromise and displaced middle third fractures with 20mm or more shortening. Plate osteosynthesis or intramedullary fixation devices are used for operative management.
Patients admitted to trauma wards are routinely screened for MRSA pre-operatively. The majority of them have implant surgery before the screening results were available. The aim of our study was to identify the incidence of MRSA wound infection in these patients and their outcome following it. We randomly reviewed 40 patients who were colonised with MRSA pre-operatively and have had implant surgeries. The case notes, drug charts and the microbiology were reviewed to identify the incidence of MRSA wound infection and its outcome in these patients. The place of residence, site of colonisation and the treatment given were also considered. 70% of the patients were admitted from home and 20% had previous admission within one year. The commonest site colonised is the nose (50%) followed by the perineum in 20%. Multiple sites were colonised in 10% of the patients. Only 50% of them with positive nasal MRSA were given nasal bactroban and chlohexidine wash was given in only 70% of them with MRSA colonisation in other areas. 22.5% (9/40) of the patients developed MRSA infection post operatively and they were treated with vancomycin or teicoplanin. Wound debridement and washout were done in 67.5%. 75% of the MRSA infected wound healed well with no MRSA in the wound site after treatment. 25% of the MRSA infected wounds had persistent MRSA in the wound. As per our study the incidence of MRSA wound infection in patients colonised pre-operatively is about 22.5%. Most cases seem to heal well without much complication with appropriate antibiotics and wound care.
