Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 40 - 40
1 Mar 2010
Vitale MG Moore DW Emerson RG Matsumoto H Gomez JA Hyman JE Roye DP
Full Access

Purpose: Despite advances in surgical technique, neurological injury remains a potentially devastating complication of spinal deformity correction surgery. The purpose of the study is to describe surgical and patient factors associated with “electrophysiologic (EP) events” and neurogenic deficits.

Method: A retrospective chart review, looking at “EP events” during surgery, was conducted on 162 patients who received surgical treatment of their pediatric spine deformity from 1999 to 2004.

Results: Ninety three percent of cases (n=151) were successfully monitored by either somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) or motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. All three neurologic deficits that occurred in this study cases were successfully detected by EP monitoring (0.02%, p=.002). In those 151 cases that were successfully monitored, “EP events” were occured in twenty (13.2%) cases. The most common cause was systemic change (45%) and curve correction (40%). In those 20 cases, when corrective actions were made (n=15) “EP events” reversed to baseline values in all cases. When no corrective actions were taken (N=5) there was no reversals of “EP events” to baseline. Patients with kyphosis had a trend toward significantly higher rates of “EP events” (p=.174) and patients who had cardiopulmonary comorbidities had significantly higher rates of “EP events” (p=.007).

Conclusion: Consistent with existing literature, the EP monitoring was successful in the vast majority of deformity surgeries. “EP events” were able to be reversed with corrective action and to predict neurologic deficits. Our study found that patients with kyphosis and/or cardiopulmonary comorbidities have higher risk of significant “EP events” during the surgeries.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 11 - 11
1 Mar 2010
Roye DP Gomez J Vitale MG Hyman JE Matsumoto H Feldman D Marangoz S vanBosse HP Sala DA Stein M
Full Access

Purpose: To describe the clinical outcomes of adolescent patients, treated with hip distraction arthroplasty for avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. Outcomes were examined in order to better understand the usefulness and indications of performing hip arthrodia-stasis in this patient population.

Method: Retrospective review was performed on thirty-one hips with femoral head AVN treated with hip distraction arthroplasty. Mean age at treatment was 14.2 years. Preoperative and follow-up pain, and physical limitations, as well as follow-up range of motion (ROM) were assessed.

Results: Follow up assessment was obtained at 18.3 years of age. Time of follow up was 55.3 months after distraction. The etiologies of AVN were: 11 Slipped Capital Femoral Epyphysis (SCFE); 5 Idiopathic AVN; 3 with hip dysplasia; and 12 others. There was a significant difference in pain preoperatively and postoperatively (p< .001), the majority of patients (79.5%, n=23) had less pain after the treatment. Multivariate regression model demonstrated that patients with SCFE were likely to have less improvement in pain than patients with other etiologies (odds ratio: 24.8; p=.035). All patients had activity limitations before the treatment; at the postoperative assessment more than half of our patients (n=15) reported no limitations in their activities. Nine patients had minor complications with the fixator. At follow up, 5 (16.1 %) patients converted to total hip replacement or arthrodesis.

Conclusion: Hip distraction arthroplasty in adolescent patients with symptomatic AVN reduces the amount of pain and limitation in daily activities, at a follow up of 4.6 years. Arthrodiastasis is not the final solution to AVN, with longer follow up patient’s symptomatology increases. Patients with AVN secondary to SCFE do not beneficiate of this procedure as much as other patients do. Hip distraction is a safe and appropriate procedure to perform in these patients. The procedure might be able to delay definitive surgical procedures at an early age, restoring function and improving the patient s quality of life.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 11 - 11
1 Mar 2010
Matsumoto H Vitale MG Gomez JA Hyman JE Kaufman BE Roye DP
Full Access

Purpose: The current literature lacks a truly comprehensive examination of the use of a valgus osteotomy to treat osteonecrosis of the femoral head and Perthes disease in the pediatric and adolescent population. Owing to the severity of the pathology, a retrospective examination of the success of valgus osteotomies in treating avascular necrosis and Perthes disease in children and adolescents is warranted.

Method: Twenty-four patients with diagnosis of osteo-necrosis of the femoral head or Perthes disease treated between 1995 and 2007 with a proximal femoral valgus osteotomy were identified. The causes of avascular necrosis were Perthes (N=14, 60.9%), slipped capital femoral epiphyses, (N=4, 17.4%), femoral neck fracture (N=2, 8.7%), hip septic arthritis (N=2, 8.7%) and developmental delays and idiopathic osteonecrosis (N=1, 4.3%). The average age of receiving a femoral valgus osteotomy was 10± 3.6 years. The average age at follow-up was 12.2± 4 years, mean time of follow-up from the initial valgus osteotomy to last assessment was 23± 15.3 months.

Results: Postoperative pain improved significantly compared to preoperative pain (p=.002). Seventy five percent of patients (n=9) who had limitations in their daily activities preoperatively reported that they no longer experienced them after the treatment. External rotation (p=.005) and abduction (p=.003) improved significantly at follow up. Postoperative Ficat & Arlet classification was significantly better when compared to the classification before valgus osteotomy (p=0.007). Univariate analysis showed that sixty percent of patients (n=6) who had Perthes had improved in their Ficat & Arlet stage whereas one (14.3%) patient with a different diagnosis improved (p=.082). Complications from the surgery were reported in 5 of the 23 (21.7%) cases.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that proximal femoral valgus osteotomy is a safe and effective treatment method for osteonecrosis of the femoral head in the pediatric population. Perthes patients improved their femoral head shape more than all other etiologies; there was a trend toward statistical significance in this change. Proximal femoral valgus osteotomy may improve pain and activity limitations in children with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. It is also effective at improving range of motion and femoral head x-ray appearance of the femoral head for these children.