A recent review of the literature on metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties (THA) revealed the lack of comparative clinical studies with a sufficient sample size and the inclusion of patient-reported outcomes as well as patient activity levels. We conducted a prospective cohort study including all metal-on-metal and conventional polyethylene (PE)-ceramic THAs with an uncemented cup (Morscher press-fit cup), a 28mm head and operated upon via a lateral approach at our University hospital between 1/1999 and 12/2008. Only THAs for primary osteoarthritis were included. The study population is part of the Geneva Hip Arthroplasty Registry, a prospective cohort followed since 1996. The following outcomes were compared between the two groups (metal-on-metal=group 1 vs. PE-ceramic bearing=group 2): (1) Complication rates with respect to infection, dislocation and revision, (2) Radiographic outcomes (presence of linear or focal femoral osteolysis, loosening), and (3) Clinical outcomes (Harris Hip score increase, SF-12, activity and patient satisfaction evaluation, presence of groin pain). Patients operated between 1/1999 and 12/2004 were evaluated five years postoperatively by an independent assessor. Cox regression analysis was used to compare incidence rates while adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics.Introduction
Methods
Large diameter metal on metal cups have been used in total hip arthroplasty advocating superior results with respect to dislocation rates, range of motion and long term survival. The Durom cup used as part of the Durom hip resurfacing system has been incriminated with poor short term results sometimes correlated to incorrect positioning of either the femoral or acetabular component. Our objective was to evaluate short term results of the Durom cup used in conjunction with standard stems. We prospectively followed all patients with a large diameter metal-on-metal articulation (Durom) and a standard stem operated upon between 9/2004 and 9/2008. Patients were seen at follow-up for a clinical (Harris hip score=HHS, UCLA scale and patient satisfaction), radiographic and questionnaire assessment.Introduction
Methods
Orthopaedic surgeons are frequently asked to perform a revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients over 80 years of age. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes after revision THA in patients 80 years or older and compare them to a cohort of patients less than 80 years of age. We reviewed all revision THAs performed in our institution from 3/1996 to 12/2008. We compared intra- and post-operative complications (medical and orthopaedic), mortality, clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between the two age groups. Peri-operative information and complications were collected prospectively, and clinical outcome data were obtained both pro- and retrospectively. The Merle d'Aubigné score, Harris Hip score, general health (SF-12) and patient satisfaction (visual analog scale) were assessed.Introduction
Methods
None of the patients required cup revision for aseptic loosening. Complications included 12 dislocations and 3 deep infections resulting in 2 total revisions. In 3 patients the stem was revised for aseptic loosening at a mean of 63 months. At 10-years the survivorship was 98.6% (95% CI 96.7; 99.4) with endpoint revision for any cause. Mean total wear was 0.89 mm (±0.5). 32 cups (18.8%) with a cup inclination >
45° had a mean wear of 1.06 mm (±0.5), whereas 138 cups (81.2%) with inclination <
45° had a mean wear of 0.86 mm (±0.5), p=0.036. In 16 cases osteolytic defects around the stem were present. The outcome scores at 10 years were: HHS 85.9 (±14.1), WOMAC pain 70.7 (±24.7), WOMAC function 68.8 (±24.5), SF-12 physical score 40.3 (±9.2) and mental score 47.0 (±10.4). Ninety-four percent of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied.