Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_18 | Pages 56 - 56
14 Nov 2024
Robbins C Paley D Sutaria S Pinsky D Roberts D
Full Access

Introduction

Research studies have established mathematical correlations between the lengths of bone segments and the possible biomechanical implications of these correlations. The Lucas sequence comprises a series of integers that adhere to the same recurrence relation as the Fibonacci sequence; it differs in that it can start with any two initial integers. The purpose of this study is to determine whether segmental lengths of the foot height, tibia, femur, and upper body follow a Lucas sequence pattern.

Method

This was a retrospective radiographic review of patients who underwent full-body EOS scans. The AP scan was used to measure standing foot height (Ft), tibial length (T), femoral length (Fe), upper body length (UB), and full body length. A linear regression test was performed to determine whether a Lucas sequence-based relationship exists between Ft + T and Fe, and between T + Fe and UB.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 69 - 69
1 May 2016
Merz M Robbins C Ward D Bono J Talmo C
Full Access

Introduction

Dual modular femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty were initially introduced to optimize joint biomechanics. These implants have been recalled due to fretting and crevice corrosion at the stem-neck interface, ultimately necessitating revision in a significant number of patients. At our institution we had experience with the Rejuvenate (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) dual modular stem from 2009 until 2011 before it's recall in 2012. This study identifies complications encountered in patients requiring revision of this prosthesis.

Methods

We retrospectively identified all patients who had one particular dual modular stem using our registry database. All patients’ charts and imaging was reviewed using our electronic medical records and digital imaging programs. Patients’ age, gender, revision date, intraoperative and postoperative complications, need for subsequent surgery were identified.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 68 - 68
1 May 2016
Talmo C Elsharkawy K Ward D Robbins C Kent S Bierbaum B Bono J
Full Access

INTRODUCTION

Corrosion of modular tapers is increasingly recognized as a source of adverse tissue reaction (ALTR) and revision surgery in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The incidence of corrosion and rate of revision for ALTR may differ among different types of implants.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine if a difference exists in rate of THA revision for corrosion and ALTR with tapered broach only stems compared to ream-broach femoral stems.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 409 - 409
1 Nov 2011
Ecker T Robbins C van Flandern G Patch D Steppacher S Kurtz W Bierbaum B Murphy S
Full Access

While alumina ceramic-ceramic THA has been performed in the US for more than 12 years, the phenomenon of frequent, clinically reproducible squeaking is relatively new. The current study investigates the influence of implant design on the incidence of squeaking.

We reviewed implant information on 1275 consecutive revision THAs performed from 10/2002 through 10/2007 to identify any patients who had complained of squeaking or grinding. We also identified, 2778 consecutive primary ceramicceramic THA. Of these, we reviewed the clinical records of 1,039 patients (37%) to date. Any patient complaint of squeaking or grinding at the time of an office visit or by phone interview was recorded. Hips were divided into group 1: flush mounted ceramic liner; group 2a: recessed ceramic liner mated with a stem made of TiAlV and using a 12/14 neck taper; and group 2b: recessed ceramic liner mated with a stem made of a beta titanium alloy comprised of 12% molybdenum, 6% Zirconium, and 2% Iron and using a neck taper smaller than a 12/14 taper.

Of the revision THAs, 5 hips (0.4%) were in patients who had complained of squeaking or grinding. All 5 hips had a recessed, metal-backed ceramic liner and evidence of metallosis. In primary THAs, Group 2b had statistically significantly (p=0.04) more squeaking (7.6%) than group 2a (3.2%) which had statistically significantly (p=0.002) more squeaking than group 1 (0.6%).

Squeaking following ceramic-ceramic THA is associated with use of a recessed metal-backed ceramic liner in combination with a femoral component made of a betatitanium alloy and using a relatively small head-neck taper. Since all revised hips in our study had metallosis, it is possible that metal debris is adversely affecting the bearing and that the elevated metal rim combined with a small head neck taper and the beta-titanium alloy contribute to this problem. Use of bearings with a flush-mounted ceramic liner mated with femoral components made of TiAlV and using a 12/14 taper appears to be prudent.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 473 - 473
1 Nov 2011
Bierbaum B Ward D Robbins C
Full Access

Wear simulator studies suggest low wear rates of Alumina ceramic femoral heads with polyethylene total hip bearings. Short-term wear and clinical data of ceramic/highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) couples are under reported in the literature. A retrospective review was performed to determine and compare the wear rate for hips implanted with an Alumina ceramic femoral head and X3® poly-ethylene insert to the acceptable polyethylene wear rate in the literature.

We evaluated 70 primary total hip replacements performed at one institution, by two surgeons, from February 2006 through June 2007. At a minimum 2 year follow-up, calculated annual wear for the ceramic/X3® polyethylene articulations showed a significant decrease compared to literature reports of 0.1mm/year or greater for conventional polyethylene.

Radiographic and clinical outcomes show no loose implants, dislocations, ceramic fractures or revision surgeries at last follow-up. These early findings suggest that ceramic/X3® bearing couples may serve as an acceptable choice for the younger, active patient.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 168 - 169
1 Mar 2010
Ecker T Robbins C van Flandern G Patch D Steppacher S Bierbaum B Murphy S
Full Access

Alumina ceramic-ceramic bearings have the benefit of very low wear and studies showing the complete absence of osteolysis during the first decade of close study. However, good results depend on several critical factors including surgical exposure, surgical technique, component placement, and choice of component design. The following abstract discusses our experience with several of these factors.

Initially, there were concerns that the use of ceramic-ceramic bearings would lead to a higher incidence of hip dislocation since the bearings have fewer femoral head-length choices and the absence of lipped-liners. In our prospective study of 418 hips the incidence of hip dislocation at 1 to 10 year followup is 0.5% (2/418). This experience suggests that the use of alumina ceramic-ceramic bearings is not associated with an increased incidence of dislocation.

More recently, concerns about squeaking of alumina ceramic-ceramic bearings have been reported, particularly from centers in the United States. To investigate this issue, we reviewed information on 1275 consecutive revision THAs and 1039 consecutive primary ceramic-ceramic THA that had been performed at two institutions between 1996 and 2007. To identify the influence of the implant design on the incidence of squeaking we divided the primary hips into three groups with group 1: flush mounted ceramic liner; group 2a: recessed ceramic liner mated with a stem made of TiAlV; and group 2b: recessed ceramic liner mated with a stem made of a beta titanium alloy comprised of 12% molybdenum, 6% Zirconium, and 2% Iron.

Analysis of the 1275 revision hips revealed 5 alumina ceramic-ceramic hips in patients who complained of squeaking or grinding. All 5 hips were designs that included a ceramic liner that was recessed inside of an elevated metal rim. All 5 hips also demonstrated metallosis at the time of revision.

In primary THA, Group 2b had statistically significantly more squeaking (9 of 118) than group 2a (10 of 321) which had statistically significantly more squeaking than group 1 (6 of 700). In addition, the severity of squeaking between the groups was qualitatively different. Patients in Group 2b who complained of squeaking would often experience squeaking frequently throughout the day and could be demonstrated in the physician’s office. By contrast, patients in Group 1 who noted squeaking stated that the hip squeaked once a day to once a year. No patient in Group 1 complained of frequent squeaking or could demonstrate squeaking in the physicians’ office. Further, joint fluid analysis from a patient in Group 2b who complained of squeaking revealed metal from both the femoral (Molybdenum) and acetabular (Aluminum) components.

As reported in another abstract at this meeting, 10 year survivorship of flush-mounted alumina ceramic-ceramic THA is 98.4% (95% confidence interval 97.1–100%) and no patient in that prospective clinical studies demonstrated radiographic evidence of osteolysis or wear.

These experiences demonstrate that THA using alumina ceramic-ceramic is extremely reliable with low revision and dislocation rates and an absence of osteolysis. Significant squeaking is not associated with flush-mounted alumina ceramic liners and is clearly associated with elevated metal rims and metallosis. Finally, squeaking is statistically significantly associated with femoral components made of a beta titanium alloy consisting of Titanium, Molybdenum, Aluminum, and Iron.