Radial head fractures are common and mainly require a functional conservative treatment. About 20% of patients will present an unsatisfactory final functional result. There is, however, little data allowing us to predict which patients are at risk of bad evolve. This makes it difficult to optimize our therapeutic strategies in these patients. The aim of this study is to determine the personal and environmental factors that influence the functional prognosis of patients with a radial head fracture.

We realized over a 1-year period a prospective observational longitudinal cohort study including 125 consecutive patients referred for a fracture of the radial head in a tertiary trauma center. We originally collected the factors believed to be prognostic indicators: age, sex, socioeconomic status, factors related to trauma or fracture, alcohol, tobacco, detection of depression scale, and financial compensation. A clinical and radiological follow-up took place at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The main functional measurement tool is the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH).

123 patients were included in the study. 114 patients required nonsurgical management. 102 patients completed the 1-year follow-up for the main outcome (89 for the DASH score). Two patients required an unplanned surgery and were excluded from analyses. At 1 year, the average MEPS was 96.5 (range, 65–100) and 81% of subjects had an excellent result (MEPS ≥90). The most constant factor to predict an unsatisfactory functional outcome (MEPS <90 or DASH >17) is the presence of depressive symptoms at the initial time of the study (P = 0.03 and P = 0.0009, respectively). This factor is present throughout the follow-up. Other observed factors include a higher socioeconomic status (P = 0.009), the presence of financial compensation (P = 0.027), and a high-velocity trauma (P = 0.04). The severity of the fracture, advanced age, female sex, and the nature of the treatment does not influence the result at 1 year. No factor has been associated with a reduction in range of motion.

Most of the radial head fractures heal successfully. We identified for the first time, with a valid tool, the presence of depressive symptoms at the time of the fracture as a significant factor for an unsatisfactory functional result. Early detection is simple and fast and would allow patients at risk to adopt complementary strategies to optimize the result.

Purpose: In pediatric orthopedics, Risser sign is used to assess skeletal maturity. Two grading system exist for the Risser sign, one US and one European. In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) the curve acceleration phase begin at a digital skeletal age (DSA) score between 400 – 425. The objective was to asses the disagreement between both grading system and evaluate the best estimator of the curve acceleration phase.

Method: One hundred twenty-one AIS patients had a PA and lateral X-rays of the spine and a left hand and wrist X-ray. Risser sign was measured according to both grading system and bone age was calculated according to Tanner-Whitehouse III method. Kappa statistics were done to evaluate concordance between US and Euro-pean grading system and 2 multiple linear regression models were performed to find which stage best predicts the beginning of the rapid acceleration phase.

Results: Kappa statistic between the US and European system was 0.517 (moderate agreement). US Risser 1 was the best predictor of the curve acceleration phase. DSA scores predicted with Risser 1 were 425 and 445 for US and European system respectively.

Conclusion: American and European Risser grading system use different criteria to define 6 stages of a same sign. This is reflected in our study with a moderate agreement between both grading systems. US Risser 1 is the stage that best predicts the beginning of the rapid acceleration phase and a close follow up should be made at the beginning of the iliac apophysis ossification.