Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is most often secondary to trauma, and frequently presents with associated injuries. A neurological examination is routinely performed during trauma assessment, including through Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). However, there is no standard neurological assessment tool specifically used for trauma patients to detect and characterize SCI during the initial evaluation. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is the most comprehensive and popular tool for assessing SCI, but it is not adapted to the acute trauma patients such that it is not routinely used in that setting. Therefore, the objective is to develop a new tool that can be used routinely in the initial evaluation of trauma patients to detect and characterize acute SCI, while preserving basic principles of the ISNCSCI.

The completion rate of the ISCNSCI during the initial evaluation after an acute traumatic SCI was first estimated. Using a modified Delphi technique, we designed the Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (MAC-SCI), a new tool to detect and characterize the completeness (grade) and level of SCI in the polytrauma patient. The ability of the MAC-SCI to detect and characterize SCI was validated in a cohort of 35 individuals who have sustained an acute traumatic SCI. The completeness and neurological level of injury (NLI) were assessed by two independent assessors using the MAC-SCI, and compared to those obtained with the ISNCSCI.

Only 33% of patients admitted after an acute traumatic SCI had a complete ISNCSCI performed at initial presentation. The MAC-SCI includes 53 of the 134 original elements of the ISNCSCI which is 60% less. There was a 100% concordance between the severity grade derived from the MAC-SCI and from the ISNCSCI. Concordance of the NLI within two levels of that obtained from the ISNCSCI was observed in 100% of patients with the MAC-SCI and within one level in 91% of patients. The ability of the MAC-SCI to discriminate between cervical (C0 to C7) vs. thoracic (T1 to T9) vs. thoraco-lumbar (T10 to L2) vs. lumbosacral (L3 to S5) injuries was 100% with respect to the ISNCSCI.

The rate of completion of the ISNCSCI is low at initial presentation after an acute traumatic SCI. The MAC-SCI is a streamlined tool proposed to detect and characterize acute SCI in polytrauma patients, that is specifically adapted to the acute trauma setting. It is accurate for determining the completeness of the SCI and localize the NLI (cervical vs. thoracic vs. lumbar). It could be implemented in the initial trauma assessment protocol to guide the acute management of SCI patients.

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is most often secondary to trauma, and frequently presents with associated injuries. A neurological examination is routinely performed during trauma assessment, including through Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). However, there is no standard neurological assessment tool specifically used for trauma patients to detect and characterize SCI during the initial evaluation. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is the most comprehensive and popular tool for assessing SCI, but it is not adapted to the acute trauma patients such that it is not routinely used in that setting. Therefore, the objective is to develop a new tool that can be used routinely in the initial evaluation of trauma patients to detect and characterize acute SCI, while preserving basic principles of the ISNCSCI.

The completion rate of the ISCNSCI during the initial evaluation after an acute traumatic SCI was first estimated. Using a modified Delphi technique, we designed the Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (MAC-SCI), a new tool to detect and characterize the completeness (grade) and level of SCI in the polytrauma patient. The ability of the MAC-SCI to detect and characterize SCI was validated in a cohort of 35 individuals who have sustained an acute traumatic SCI. The completeness and neurological level of injury (NLI) were assessed by two independent assessors using the MAC-SCI, and compared to those obtained with the ISNCSCI.

Only 33% of patients admitted after an acute traumatic SCI had a complete ISNCSCI performed at initial presentation. The MAC-SCI includes 53 of the 134 original elements of the ISNCSCI which is 60% less. There was a 100% concordance between the severity grade derived from the MAC-SCI and from the ISNCSCI. Concordance of the NLI within two levels of that obtained from the ISNCSCI was observed in 100% of patients with the MAC-SCI and within one level in 91% of patients. The ability of the MAC-SCI to discriminate between cervical (C0 to C7) vs. thoracic (T1 to T9) vs. thoraco-lumbar (T10 to L2) vs. lumbosacral (L3 to S5) injuries was 100% with respect to the ISNCSCI.

The rate of completion of the ISNCSCI is low at initial presentation after an acute traumatic SCI. The MAC-SCI is a streamlined tool proposed to detect and characterize acute SCI in polytrauma patients, that is specifically adapted to the acute trauma setting. It is accurate for determining the completeness of the SCI and localize the NLI (cervical vs. thoracic vs. lumbar). It could be implemented in the initial trauma assessment protocol to guide the acute management of SCI patients.

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is most often secondary to trauma, and frequently presents with associated injuries. A neurological examination is routinely performed during trauma assessment, including through Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). However, there is no standard neurological assessment tool specifically used for trauma patients to detect and characterize SCI during the initial evaluation. The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) is the most comprehensive and popular tool for assessing SCI, but it is not adapted to the acute trauma patients such that it is not routinely used in that setting. Therefore, the objective is to develop a new tool that can be used routinely in the initial evaluation of trauma patients to detect and characterize acute SCI, while preserving basic principles of the ISNCSCI.

The completion rate of the ISCNSCI during the initial evaluation after an acute traumatic SCI was first estimated. Using a modified Delphi technique, we designed the Montreal Acute Classification of Spinal Cord Injuries (MAC-SCI), a new tool to detect and characterize the completeness (grade) and level of SCI in the polytrauma patient. The ability of the MAC-SCI to detect and characterize SCI was validated in a cohort of 35 individuals who have sustained an acute traumatic SCI. The completeness and neurological level of injury (NLI) were assessed by two independent assessors using the MAC-SCI, and compared to those obtained with the ISNCSCI.

Only 33% of patients admitted after an acute traumatic SCI had a complete ISNCSCI performed at initial presentation. The MAC-SCI includes 53 of the 134 original elements of the ISNCSCI which is 60% less. There was a 100% concordance between the severity grade derived from the MAC-SCI and from the ISNCSCI. Concordance of the NLI within two levels of that obtained from the ISNCSCI was observed in 100% of patients with the MAC-SCI and within one level in 91% of patients. The ability of the MAC-SCI to discriminate between cervical (C0 to C7) vs. thoracic (T1 to T9) vs. thoraco-lumbar (T10 to L2) vs. lumbosacral (L3 to S5) injuries was 100% with respect to the ISNCSCI.

The rate of completion of the ISNCSCI is low at initial presentation after an acute traumatic SCI. The MAC-SCI is a streamlined tool proposed to detect and characterize acute SCI in polytrauma patients, that is specifically adapted to the acute trauma setting. It is accurate for determining the completeness of the SCI and localize the NLI (cervical vs. thoracic vs. lumbar). It could be implemented in the initial trauma assessment protocol to guide the acute management of SCI patients.

Purpose: The purpose of this work was to analyse results of revision procedures for unicompartmental prostheses (UNI) replaced by total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to detail technical difficulties.

Material and methods: This series included 54 UNI revised with TKA. There were 45 medial and nine lateral UNI. The cause of failure was determined from the clinical history, the postoperative x-rays following UNI implantation and the preoperative x-rays before TKA as well as the operation report. Mean time from failure of UNI to TKA was four years. Clinical results were assessed with IKS criteria. The radiological work-up included an AP and lateral view in single leg stance and goniometry in 44.5% of the cases. Twenty-seven patients were reviewed with standard x-rays, eight patients were lost to follow-up, and 19 were studied from the medical files. One patient died.

Results: Mean follow-up was four years (range 2–12 years). There were seven failures (13%). We noted six cases of phlebitis, two plumonary emoblisms, one secondary infection, and three mobilisations under general anaesthesia. 55.5% of the patients were very satisfied, 36% were satisfied and 8.5% were disappointed. Revision was considered easy or moderately difficult in 82% of the cases. A standard gliding TKA was implanted in 39 cases (72%). Mean knee score was 85 points. Mean flexion was 113°. The mean function score was 62 points. For 91% of the cases, there was no laxity. The femorotibial angle was 90° in 54% of the cases and the mechanical tibial angle was 90° in 46%.

Discussion: Our results are similar to those reported in the literature. They were better than reports of TKA revision TKA. Results of TKA revision of UNI have been good. There is no technical problem related to bone loss, generally at the tibial level (45%). Preoperative planning allows defining the revision modalities (long pivot, metal backing, revision prosthesis). We recommend a long tibial pivot in the event of important tibial bone loss.