There is no optimal treatment for This is a prospective case series. The inclusion criteria were the combination of a large OCD (ϕ >12 mm) of the medial Between October 2007 and March 2009 10 patients were included. The median follow-up was 2 years (range, 2–3 years). On preoperative CT scanning, the median lesion size was 15 (range, 12–20) × 11 (range, 8–14) mm. The NRS rest improved from a median of 3 (0–7) preoperatively to 0.5 (0–2) at final follow-up (p = 0.017), NRS walking from 6.5 (4–8) to 1 (0–4) (p = 0.005), NRS running from 9 (6–10) to 3 (0–10) (p = 0.024), and NRS stair climbing from 6 (4–8) to 1 (0–7) (p = 0.012). The FAOS improved significantly on four of five subscales. The AOFAS improved from a median of 70 (47–75) before surgery to 89 (69–100) at final follow-up (p = 0.008). There were three temporary complications: hyposensibility about the scar in two and a superficial wound infection in one. There were no radiographic complications.
Osteochondral ankle defects (OCDs) mainly occur in a young, active population. In 63% of cases the defect is located on the medial talar dome. Arthroscopic debridement and microfracture is considered the primary treatment for defects up to 15 mm. To treat patients with a secondary OCD of the medial talar dome, a 15-mm diameter metal implant (HemiCAP ®) was developed. The set of 15 offset sizes was designed to correspond with the anatomy of various talar dome curvatures. Recently, two independent biomechanical cadaver studies were published, providing rationale for clinical use. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of the metal implantation technique for osteochondral lesions of the medial talar dome in a prospective study. Since October 2007, twenty patients have been treated with the implant. Four patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria and four patients who had less than one-year follow-up at the time of writing were left out of this analysis. Twelve patients are reported with one year (n=8) or two years (n=4) follow-up. All patients had had one or two earlier operations without success. On preoperative CT-scanning, the mean lesion size was 16 × 11 (range, 9–26 × 8–14) mm. Outcome measures were: Numeric Rating Scale pain (NRS) at rest and when walking, Foot Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot score, and clinical and radiographic complications. Data are presented as median and range. The Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used to calculate p-values.Objectives
Material and methods