Recently, a new technique of custom-made cutting guides for TKA is introduced to clinical practice. However, no published data yet on the comparison between this new technique against both navigation and conventional techniques. The author prospectively compared between custom-made cutting guides, navigation and conventional techniques. A total number of 90 cases were included in this study with 30 consecutive cases for each technique. The highest number of medically unfit patients and those with articular and extra articular deformities were in custom guides groups. The results showed one case of aseptic loosening after one year in custom guides, one case of superficial infection and loose pins but with no fracture in navigation group, and higher need for blood transfusion in conventional. One case in the custom guide group had a periprosthetic fracture 3 weeks postoperatively diagnosed as insufficiency fracture after a relatively minor trauma to an osteoporotic bone. Navigation was the most accurate in alignment but custom guides was the most accurate in implant sizing and had the least bleeding. This clinical study showed some advantages of custom-made cutting guides over conventional instrumentation. It eliminated medullary guides, reduced operative time, and provided better accuracy. The technique was proved to be useful in complex cases of deformities and unfit patients.
The purpose of this retrospective study was to review the outcome of THA in the treatment of bilateral hip ankylosis of different causes; surgical, septic or spontaneous. 20 THA procedures in 10 patients were included in the study, 5 males and 5 females all had bilateral fusion. Previous pathologies included: ankylosing spondylitis, AVN, septic arthritis and surgical arthrodesis. Flexion deformity ranged (10°-45°). Shortening as compared to normal anatomy was up to 6 cm and leg length discrepancy (LLD) ranged from 1 cm to 2.5 cm. Most unified X-ray finding was massive osteophytes formation with 3 patients showing severe narrowing of the femoral canal. Operative time averaged 147 minutes (70–210) and lateral approach was used in all patients, anesthesia was general with only 3 undergoing spinal anesthesia.Introduction
Methods & Material