Acetabular bone defects are still challenging to quantify. Numerous classification schemes have been proposed to categorize the diverse kinds of defects. However, these classification schemes are mainly descriptive and hence it remains difficult to apply them in pre-clinical testing, implant development and pre-operative planning. By reconstructing the native situation of a defect pelvis using a Statistical Shape Model (SSM), a more quantitative analysis of the bone defects could be performed. The aim of this study is to develop such a SSM and to validate its accuracy using relevant clinical scenarios and parameters. An SSM was built on the basis of segmented 66 CT dataset of the pelvis showing no orthopedic pathology. By adjusting the SSM's so called The validity of the SSM was tested by a Leave-one-out study, whereby one pelvis at a time was removed from the 66 pelvises and was reconstructed using a SSM of the remaining 65 pelvises. The reconstruction accuracy was assessed by comparing each original pelvis with its reconstruction based on the root-mean-square (RMS) surface error and five clinical parameters (center of rotation, acetabulum diameter, inclination, anteversion, and volume). The influence of six different numbers of shape variation modes (reflecting the degrees of freedom of the SSM) and four different mask sizes (reflecting different clinical scenarios) was analyzed.Introduction
Methods
Numerous complications following total knee replacement (TKR)
relate to the patellofemoral (PF) joint, including pain and patellar
maltracking, yet the options for A total of three knees with end-stage osteoarthritis and three
knees that had undergone TKR at more than one year’s follow-up were
investigated. In each knee, sequential biplane radiological images
were acquired from the sagittal direction (i.e. horizontal X-ray
source and 10° below horizontal) for a sequence of eight flexion
angles. Three-dimensional implant or bone models were matched to
the biplane images to compute the six degrees of freedom of PF tracking
and TF kinematics, and other clinical measures.Objectives
Methods
