To evaluate efficacy and outcome of embolisation following pelvic ring injuries in patients presented with ongoing hypovolaemic shock. Between 2000 and 2003, 200 poly-trauma patients presented in our institutions following pelvic ring injuries. Those with ongoing hypovolaemic shock who were treated within 24h of admission with embolisation were included in this study. Demographics, mechanism of injury, ISS, type of pelvic ring fracture, arterial source of bleeding, hours from injury to embolisation, and outcome were all recorded prospectively. Out of the 200 treated in our institutions 17 (8.5%) underwent angio-embolisation. The mean age of the patients was 37 (14-70) and the mean ISS was 29. Distribution of pelvic ring injuries included: 3LC, 7APC, 7VS. The mean time from injury to embolisation was 15 hours. 8/17 patients were initially treated with an external fixator. The distribution of arterial injuries was: 7 superior gluteal arteries, 8 internal iliac arteries, 1 obturator artery and 1 internal pudental artery. The mean number of units transfused prior to embolisation was 22 (range 6-50). Mortality rate was 4 (23%) out of 17 embolised patients. Angio-embolisation for pelvic ring injuries occurred in 8.5% of our study population. This study indicates that only a small proportion of patients required embolisation secondary to arterial bleeding. The overall survival rate was in accordance to published international experience. Embolisation should be considered as a valid adjunct in some selected group of patients with pelvic fractures where ongoing bleeding refractory to other treatment modalities is present.
The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using NAVITRAK, a system of Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery and conventional fluoroscopic technique. Twelve porcine lumbar spines were scanned pre-operatively by computer tomography for 3-D reconstruction ( 1 mm slice thickness, 1mm increment and 2.5 mm pitch ). Computer randomisation divided the specimens between surgeons of different experience, and the two pedicles of each vertebral level between the two surgical techniques. Stainless steel screws (6.5 spongiosa) were inserted. Post-operatively, fluoroscopic- and CT imaging were blindly assessed for accuracy by two independent observers, and compared to macroscopic dissection of the spinal segments. Of 168 pedicles in 12 porcine specimens, 166 received a pedicle screw. Two pedicle screw placements were abandoned. Sixyty-one screws (73%) were placed satisfactorily with the CAOS system, 56 (67.5%) in the conventional group. In 26 pedicles the screws were placed unsatisfactorily (12 pedicles (46.2%) with the NAVITRAK system and 14 pedicles (53.8%) with the conventional technique. The NAVITRAK system in combination with stainless steel screws showed a difference of 5.5% in misplacement in favour for the computer assisted technique.
The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of pedicle screw placement comparing Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery equipment with conventional fluoroscopic technique. Twelve porcine cervical spines were scanned pre-operatively by computer tomography for 3D reconstruction (1 mm slice thickness, 1mm increment and 1 mm pitch). Computerised randomisation divided the specimens between surgeons of different experience, and the two pedicles of each vertebral level between the two surgical techniques. Stainless steel screws (6.5 diameter, spongiosa) were inserted. Post-operatively, fluoroscopic imaging was used for accuracy assessment by two independent observers, and findings were compared to macroscopic dissection of the spinal segments. Of 96 pedicles in 12 porcine specimens, 78 received a pedicle screw, 18 screw placements were abandoned, 38 (39.6%) were satisfactorily placed (19 in each, p>
0.05). 40 screws were misplaced, 18 (45%) with the NAVITRAK system vs. 22 (55%) with the conventional technique. These single factor results (all non-significant), were corroborated using a linear logistic regression model. Some heterogeneity in performance was detected between surgeons, independently of the type of technique used. Computer assisted surgery is an aiming device and is not advantageous over conventional methods in spines with high bone density.