Purpose: Numerous implants used in repairing a trochanteric fracture of the hip are currently available. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the complications and results of the percutaneous compression plate (PCCP), a relatively new device versus the conventional dynamic hip screw (DHS).

Materials and Methods: Between 2001–2003, 110 consecutive patients with trochanteric fractures were treated in our department. Fifty-five fractures were stabilized using the PCCP and 55 fractures were treated with the DHS. Results were analyzed according to fracture pattern, type of implant, quality of fracture reduction and position of implant. Function was assessed on the basis of pain, walking aids and walking capability.

Results: Forty-seven (85%) of 55 hips treated with PCCP healed without additional treatment and complications. Forty-three (78%) treated with DHS healed without additional treatment and complications. Complications among 8 patients (15%) of the PCCP group were: deep vein thrombosis, cardiac complication, chest infection and pressure sores. Complications among 12 patients (22%) of the DHS group were: implant failure (7%), deep wound infection, deep vein thrombosis and pressure sores.

Conclusions: Use of the PCCP implant provides similar and occasionally better results compared to those obtained with the conventional DHS device. The most outstanding advantage of the PCCP device was no implant failure or implant cut out.