The main causes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) revisions are loosening and instability. Use of a dual mobility cup cemented in a acetabular reconstruction cage device limits the risk of instability and does not hinder the acetabular fixation during THA revisions. The objective of this study was to analyse a retrospective series of 123 THA revisions with antiprotusio cage and dual mobility socket. Patients and methods: At a mean follow-up of 10 years, we analysed a continuous series of 123 revisions using a reconstruction device (87 Kerboull cross-plates, 12 Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cages, 24 custom-fit Novae ARM cages associated in all cases with a Novae Stick dual mobility cup cemented into the cage). There were 80 women and 43 males. The mean age at the surgery was 69.2 years old. PMA score increased from 9.6 +/− 3.06 preoperatively to 14.2 +/− 2. at the follow-up. 9 early dislocations occurred and one late dislocation. At the last follow-up, the X-rays showed nine hardware failures, including one cross-plate fracture, one hook fracture, and one flange fracture. Analysis of the radiological position of the cup showed a mean lowering of 13 mm and a 7 mm lateralisation compared to the preoperative position. 2 revisions for aseptic loosening and 3 for septic loosening were performed. This study confirms the advantage of dual mobility cups during acetabular reconstruction cemented in antiprotrusio cages as a way to limit, without eliminating, the risk of dislocation. Therefore cemented fixation of dual mobility cups in cages appears to be a reliable short-term option.
Dual mobility significantly reduces the risk of prosthetic instability. This mechanical complication occurs when the prosthetic head moves out from the retentive polyethylene liner, such phenomenon called intra-prosthetic dislocation reports a ten-year incidence of 2% in the literature. We prospectively analysed all intra-prosthetic dislocations having occurred since 1985 in our department in order to investigate patient- and implant-related risk factors. 91 intra-prosthetic dislocations occurred with NOVAE (SERF) cups in 85 patients of mean age 50.7 years. Intra-prosthetic dislocation occurred after a mean period of 8.8 years. A PRO (SERF) stem was implanted in 56 cases and a PF (SERF) stem in 35. The stems were different from one another in their neck diameter and material: 13 mm titanium neck and 16 mm stainless steel neck respectively. When taking both prosthetic features into account, no significant difference could be established regarding the time between implantation and dislocation. Comparison between these two prosthetic features was performed by means of two continuous homogeneous series which included 240 patients implanted with PF stems and 382 patients with PRO stems. At a mean 15-year follow-up, the two series reported a non-statistically different intra-prosthetic dislocation rate of 4%. In both series, young age and large diameter cups were considered predisposing factors for intra-prosthetic dislocation. Therefore, unlike suggested by several authors, prosthetic neck material and diameter do not appear as the main predictors for intra-prosthetic dislocation which is highly promoted by patient-related features.
The concept of stainless steel dual mobility cups in total hip arthroplasty has demonstrated very low long-term instability rates and a 98% survival rate after 12 years. We systematically implanted titanium alloy acetabular cups during a one year period. The purpose of our retrospective study was to report the 18-year clinical outcome data in a homogeneous and continuous series of 103 primary total hip replacements after implantation of a cementless titanium cup. All patients were implanted with NOVAE Ti (SERF) cups made of titanium alloy combined with a retentive polyethylene liner and a 22.2 mm cobalt chrome prosthetic head. Mean patient age at the time of surgery was 53 years. All patients were clinically and radiographically evaluated. The overall 18-year actuarial cup survival rate with a 95% confidence interval was 87.4%. At last follow-up, there was no evidence of implant instability whereas acetabular aseptic loosening was reported in one case and high wear of the retentive liner in 9. The results of this investigation confirmed the long-term stability of dual-mobility implants. The main limitation of this system was early wear of the polyethylene liner in contact with the titanium metal back and reaction with third body along with loss of liner retentivity. In our study, titanium demonstrated favourable osteointegration properties but poor tribologic characteristics, therefore suggesting its interest at the bone-cup interface only.
The chosen surgical technique was always identical using a medial approach and performed by a single dedicated orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon (JLB), followed by an osteotomy of the insertion of the Tibialis posterior muscle to the Navicular bone, distraction and avivement of the articular surface done without bone resection, reduction of the talus on the calcaneus, fixation of the talonavicular joint with titanium staples (Pareos®) and of the subtalar joint with two 6.5 mm canulated cancellous screws (Unima®). On five occasions (in 3 pes planovalgus and in 2 cavus foot) arthrodesis of the calcaneocuboid joint was carried out through a mini lateral approach due to painful arthritic lesions.
In the subgroup with pes planovalgus: the mean Kitaoka score increased from 44 to 75, the axis of the hind-foot decreased from 21° to 11° in valgus, Djian’s angle decreased from 142° to 134.4°, the slope of the calcaneus increased from 17° to 19.4°. Two failures of the associated medial ligament reparation have led to a secondary complementary arthrodesis of the talo-crural joint. In the subgroup with cavus foot: the mean Kitaoka score increased from 16 to 67. The axis of the hindfoot decreased from 13° in varus to 0.6° in valgus. Djians’s angle increased from 117° to 127.4°, the slope of the calcaneus ranges from 21.3° to 21.5°.
Double arthrodesis via a medial approach provide a significant correction of the fixed deformities without resorting to bone grafts. Not classically used in cavus foot, it has permitted the correction of the cavo varus deformity without complications of the surgical wound and by extending the approach, a double elevating osteotomy of the metatarsal bases was performed when necessary.
Functional assessment was performed using Kitaoka score. Postoperative complications were analyzed. Delay of work and sports recovery was noticed. Isokinetic evaluation was performed using Con-Trex® dynamometer. Statistical analysis was performed using Student’s t-test and Wilcoxon test (level of significance, p <
0.05).
Mean follow-up was 15.3 years. The mean Merle d’Aubigner hip score was 16.3±1.8 at the latest follow-up. There was no early or late instability. Radiologically, there were 31% of severe granuloma formation extending beyond zones I and VII. However, granuloma remained asymptomatic in all of the cases and did not require surgical revision of the femoral component. On the acetabular side, late complications occurred: aseptic loosening (3.3%), intra-prosthetic dislocation (3.6%), polyethylene wear that required replacement of the liner (1.8%). Survival of dual-articulation acetabular system with surgical revision for aseptic loosening as the end-point for failure was 96.4% at 15 years and 94.9% at 18 years postoperatively (p<
0.05).
The primary etiology necessitating revision is aseptic loosening. According to the SOFCOT classification, the acetabular deficiency was grade IV 9 times, grade III 47 times, grade I or II 107 times. All the implanted acetabular components are SERF dual-mobility implants. This system consists of a metal back which can be HA-coated and Press Fit or cemented in a Kerboull cross or in a Novae Arm. The mobile-bearing insert which allows a dual articulation between the head and the metal back is of polyethylene. We implanted 119 HA-coated press-fit cups and cemented 44 dual-mobility cups in a support ring or in a Kerboull cross.
We reported 8 complications: 6 early dislocations and 2 acetabular revisions for secondary mobilisation of the cup.
With 4% dislocations at a mean follow-up of 56 months, the dual-mobility cup seems to provide high stability in revision hip surgery when other factors such as muscular deficiency, extended synovectomies, difficult implant placement, encourage an uncertain postoperative prosthetic stability. These results have to be compared to those of other systems such as constrained acetabular cups or tripolar cups.