header advert
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 340 - 340
1 Jul 2011
Sayegh F Kenanidis E Potoupnis M Papavasiliou K Pellios S Kapetanos G
Full Access

Aim of this prospective, randomized study is to introduce and compare a new technique of reduction of the anterior dislocation of the shoulder with the “Hippocrates” and “Kocher” methods, as far as its efficacy, safety and intensity of the pain felt by the patient during the reduction, are concerned. This is the first reported prospective, randomized comparative study of three reduction techniques of anterior dislocations of the shoulder.

154 patients suffering from acute anterior shoulder dislocation participated in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the three study groups (New, “Hippocrates” and “Kocher”) and underwent reduction of their dislocation performed by residents orthopaedic surgeons.

The groups were statistically comparable (age, male/ female ratio, mechanism of dislocation, mean time interval between injury and first attempt of reduction).

Reduction was achieved with the “Fares” method in 88.6%, with the “Hippocrates” in 72.5% and with the “Kocher” in 68% of the patients. This difference was statistically significant, favoring the new method (p=0.033). The mean duration of the reduction (p=0.000) and the mean reported by the patients VAS with the new method (p=0.000) were also statistically significantly lower than those of the other methods. No complications were noted in any group.

The new method seems to be more effective, faster and less painful method of reduction of the anterior shoulder dislocation, when compared with the “Hippocrates” and the “Kocher” methods. It is easily performed by only one physician and it is not more morbid that the other two methods.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 372 - 372
1 Jul 2011
Potoupnis M Iakovou J Kenanidis E Pellios S Karatzas N Kapetanos G
Full Access

Aggrecan is a major constituent of joint cartilage. A prominent feature in joint disease is loss of Aggrecan. The aim of this study was to assess the relation between the concentration of Aggrecan in the synovial fluid of knee joint and this of the peripheral blood in patients suffering from end stage knee osteoarthritis

37 postmenopausal women suffering from end-stage idiopathic knee osteoarthritis, scheduled to undergo Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), were enrolled in this study. Their mean age was 69.8 years (range: 49–81 years). The serum levels of Aggrecan were evaluated one day pre-operatively whether synovial fluid levels from fluid taken during the operation day.

Patients suffering from any endocrine disorder, rheumatoid or other secondary arthritis or any other disease that could interfere with the cartilage homeostasis were excluded from the study. Concentrations of aggrecan turnover were measured with appropriate assays.

Moderate correlation between serum and synovial fluid concentrations of aggrecan was revealed (r= 0, 337, p=0,197)

Serum levels of aggrecan may be related to the synovial concentration of Aggrecan in patients suffering from end stage knee osteoarthritis. The possible significant relationship between these markers may be of value in assessing cartilage degradation in patients with involvement of a single joint with a blood sample. However this correlation needs to be further investigated


Objective: The clinical significance of biochemical bone markers in the diagnosis and severity of Osteoarthritis remains still unknown. The relationship between biochemical bone turnover markers and commonly recognizable radiographic features of knee and hip osteoarthritis remains unclear.

Purpose: We evaluated the serum levels of Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-κB Ligand (RANKL), Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (b-ALP), Osteocalcin and Osteoprotegerin in two groups of patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip respectively, aiming to correlate these results with the radiographically assessed severity of the disease and the patients’ age. The results between the two groups were also compared.

Patients-Methods: Between March 2007 and February 2009, a total of 175 patients suffering from Knee or Hip Osteoarthritis were enrolled in the study. Following proper radiographic evaluation, the osteoarthritic changes of patients were graded by 3 orthopaedic surgeons according to the system of Kellgren and Lawrence; at the same time the serum levels of biochemical markers were determined.

Results: Osteoprotegerin was found to be positively correlated with age in both the Knee (r=0.376, p=0.000) and Hip (r=0.425, p=0.001) group, whether Osteocalcin was significantly correlated with the age in the group of Knee Osteoarthritis(r=0.218, p=0.02). No other significant correlation was noted between the serum level of markers and age of patients in both groups. There was not significant difference in the mean serum level of biochemical markers among patients belonging to each of the four different levels of severity of hip and knee OA. There was no significant impact of the type of Osteoarthritis, to the serum level of all biochemical markers.

Conclusions: Based on our results, it seems that none of the serum biochemical markers studied can be used (either independently or in combination with the others) as surrogates for radiographic imaging in Hip and Knee osteoarthritis.


Background: The clinical significance of bone turnover markers is well recognized, at least in several diseases affecting the bone metabolism. However, their clinical significance (if any) remains still unknown in patients undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA). Changes in the levels of some markers have been reported in the early postoperative period after Total Hip Arthroplasty; however their exact postoperative course has not been clearly documented yet. In order to assess the clinical value of biochemical markers when trying to determine the fixation of orthopaedic implants, it is necessary to clarify their normal postoperative course.

The aim of this study was to extend the evaluation of the course of bone turnover markers over a longer period (12 postoperative months) following a TJA, and to assess the postoperative course for two of them (RANKL and Osteoprotegerin) for the first time.

Methods: The serum levels of RANKL, Osteocalcin, Osteoprotegerin and bALP were determined one day preoperatively and several times during the first postoperative year in patients suffering from idiopathic osteoarthritis that underwent total knee (n=23) and hip arthroplasties (n=24).

Results: There were statistically significant changes in the serum levels of all markers over time (p< 0,001). RANKL values initially increased and then gradually decreased. Following an initial decrease, Osteocalcin values continuously increased until the 2nd postoperative month and then continuously decreased. Osteoprotegerin initially increased, then decreased until the 4th postoperative month and then increased again reaching a peak 8 months postoperatively. Bone-specific ALP decreased until the 7th postoperative day. After that time it continuously increased, reaching a peak at the 8th month, and then it gradually decreased. There were no major differences in the postoperative course of all markers between the hip and knee arthroplasties.

Conclusions: The levels of all bone markers did not uniformly ‘return’ to their preoperative values one year postoperatively. A one-year period is not enough, when assessing an orthopaedic implant’s fixation with the use of bone turnover markers.