Video recording to teach and assess both technical and non-technical skills is well-established within medical education. Trainees’ clinical and practical competencies are evaluated using Procedure-Based Assessments (PBAs). However, there is limited research describing how these PBAs truly reflect trainee performance. We sought to: assess the duration between the procedure and PBA completion assess the perceived viability of supplementing assessments using intra-operative camera footage and clarify medico-legal considerations for the use of cameras in theatre. We undertook a survey of Orthopaedic trainees in the East of England Deanery, United Kingdom. A six-item questionnaire was designed and provided to trainees (paper and online) to assess the time between procedure and filling in PBA forms, level of consultant input, time to PBA sign-off and trainees’ views on current PBA methods, operative video recording and retrospective access to clinical footage.Introduction
Method
Studies have shown that as many as 1 in 5 patients is dissatisfied following total knee replacement (TKA). There has also been a large reported disparity between surgeon and patient perception of clinical “success”. It has long been shown that surgeon opinion of procedural outcomes is inflated when compared with patient-reported outcomes. Additionally, TKA recipients have consistently reported higher pain levels, greater inhibition of function, and lower satisfaction than total hip replacement (THA) recipients. It is imperative that alternative methods be explored to improve TKA patient satisfaction. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether or not patients with a balanced TKA, as measured using intraoperative sensors, exhibit better clinical outcomes. 310 patients scheduled for TKA surgery were enrolled in a 6 center, randomized controlled trial, resulting in two patient groups: a sensor-guided TKA group and a surgeon-guided TKA group. Intraoperative load sensors were utilized in all cases, however in one group the surgeon used the feedback to assist in balancing the knee and in the other group the surgeon balanced without load data and the sensor was used to blindly record the joint balance. For this evaluation, the two groups were pooled and categorized as either balanced or unbalanced, as defined by a mediolateral load differential less than 15 lbf (previously described in literature). Clinical outcomes data were collected at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year post- operatively, including Knee Society Satisfaction and the Forgotten Joint Score. Using linear mixed models, these outcome measures were compared between the balanced and unbalanced patient groups.Introduction & Aims
Methods
