Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been increasingly used because it improves the accuracy of implant placement. However, some clinical cases have reported complications caused from pin holes during the computer navigated surgery. The objective of this study is to analyse the femoral fracture risk cause by the pin hole in the computer navigated TKA by using finite element analysis. Three dimensional finite element model of the human femur was developed from CT images. A parametric investigation was conducted to analyse the femoral fracture risk for the following parameters: hole sizes (3, 4, and 5 mm) and hole position (70, 100, and 130 mm above the distal end). Four different penetrations (unicortical, bicortical, half-bicortical, and transcortical) methods in tubular bone were considered in each model, where the half-bicortical penetration was defined that the pin hole was located between the holes of bicortical and transcortical penetrations. The finite element model was rigidly fixed to a distance of 25 mm above the distal end. The vertical load of 1500 N and the torsional load of 12 Nm were applied to the femoral head. The maximum von-Mises stress, which was chosen as the fracture risk factor, was then investigated around pin hole. The maximum von-Mises stress around the pin hole was the highest in the transcortical penetration for different hole sizes: 7.8~8.5, 15.7~16.2, 15.5~16.8, and 25.5~45.3 MPa under the vertical load, and 9.6~10.5, 9.7~11.0, 8.8~10.2, and 14.2~33.8 MPa under the torsional load in unicortical, bicortical, half-bicortical, and transcortical penetrations, respectively. For the different hole position, the maximum von-Mises stress around the pin hole was: 6.0~7.8, 15.7~24.7, 16.3~19.6, and 12.2~22.4 MPa under the vertical load, and 9.6~10.7, 9.7~11.5, 8.7~9.8, and 12.2~16.6 MPa under the torsional load in unicortical, bicortical, half-bicortical, and transcortical penetrations, respectively. For the pin hole size, the maximum stress increased only in the transcortical penetration regardless of the loads as the pin hole size increased. However, there was little meaningful difference between the hole positions for each penetration method. The results of this study suggested that it would be beneficial to avoid using the transcortical penetration and large size of pin with respect to reduction of femoral fracture risk since the high stress may cause the femoral fracture.
Even though spinal fusion has been used as one of the common surgical techniques for degenerative lumbar pathologies, high stiffness in the fusion segment could generate clinical complications in the adjacent spinal segment. To avoid these limitations of fusion, the artificial discs have recently used to preserve the motion of the treated segment in lumbar spine surgery. However, there have been lacks of biomechanical information of the artificial discs to explain current clinical controversies such as long-term results of implant wear and excessive facet contact forces. In this study, we investigated the biomechanical performance for three artificial discs in the lumbar spinal segments by finite element analysis. A three-dimensional finite element model of five spinal motion segments, from L1 to S, in intact lumbar spine was reconstructed from CT images. Finite element models of three artificial discs, semi-constrained and metal on polyethylene core type (ProDisc® II, Spine Solutions Inc., USA; Type I), semi-constrained and metal on metal type (MaverickTM, Medtronic Sofamor Danek Inc., USA; Type II), and un-constrained and metal on polyethylene core type (SB ChariteTM III, Dupuy Spine Inc., Switzerland; Type III) were developed. Each artificial disc was inserted at L4–L5 segment, respectively. Upper and lower plates of artificial discs were attached on the L4 and L5 vertebrae. Some parts of ligaments and intervertebral disc in L4–L5 motion segment were removed to insert artificial discs. Nonlinear contact conditions were applied on facet joints in lumbar spine model and artificial discs. Bottom of sacrum was fixed on the ground and 5Nm of flexion and extension moments were applied on the superior plate of L1 with 400N of compressive load along follower load direction. In extension, all three artificial disc models showed higher rotation ratio at the surgical levels, but lower rotations at the adjacent levels than those in the intact model. There was no big difference of the intersegmental rotations among the artificial disc models. For the comparison of the peak von-Mises stresses on the polyethylene core in flexion, 52.3 MPa in type I implant was higher than 20.1 MPa in Type III implant while the peak von-Mises stresses were similar, 25.3 MPa and 26.5 MPa in Type I and III, respectively in extension. The facet contact forces at the surgical level for the artificial disc models showed 140 to 160 N in extension whereas the facet contact force in the intact model was 60 N. From the results of this study, we could investigate the biomechanical characteristics of three different artificial disc models. The relative rotation at the surgical level would be increases at the early outcome after total disk replacement. The semi-constrained type artificial disc could generate higher wear risk of the implant than unconstrained type. Also all types of artificial disc model have higher risk of facet joint arthrosis, and especially in the semi-constrained and metal on metal type. The results of the present study suggested that more careful care must be taken to choose surgical technique of total disc replacement surgery.
Spinal fusion has been used as the gold standard to treat some spinal disorders such as degenerative disc or disc herniation of the cervical spine. However, some clinical complications have been reported caused by high stiffness of spinal fusion. Recently, total disc arthroplasty using motion preservation devices such as artificial discs (ADs) have been proposed as an alternative treatment technique. In current study, we analysed biomechanical influences including inter-segmental motion, facet joint forces, and ligament stresses of two different clinical available ADs and compared with those of intact cervical spine in various loading conditions using finite element analysis. A three dimensional finite element model was developed for C2-C7 spinal motion segment based on CT images and previous anatomical literatures. The finite element models for two different types of ADs, semi-constraint (Prodisc-C®, Synthes, U.S.A) and un-constraint (Mobi-C®, LDR Spine, U.S.A), were developed. Each AD was inserted at C6–C7 segments. Superior and inferior plates of ADs were fixed on inferior plane of C6 and superior plane of C7 vertebrae, respectively. Based on the conventional surgical techniques, anterior longitudinal ligaments and some parts of intervertebral disc in C6–C7 motion segment were removed to insert ADs. Inferior plane of C7 vertebra was constrained in all directions and 1Nm of flexion, extension, lateral bending and torsion were applied on superior plane of C2 vertebra with 50N of compressive load along follower load direction. Rotation angle in flexion of C5–C6 segment in cases of semi-constraint and un-constraint AD was 3.3° and 3.7°, respectively. Both values were greater than that in case of the intact cervical spine by 18% and 32%, respectively. Rotation angle in extension, lateral bending and torsion were greater than intact model by 45%, 26% and 43% for the case of semi-constraint AD and 55%, 35%, 100% for the case of un-constraint one, respectively. In extension, facet joint forces were about two times higher than intact model in cases of semi-constraint and un-constraint AD. Also in flexion, on average, ligament stresses in cases of semi-constraint and un-constraint AD were higher than intact model by 66% and 116%, respectively. The results of this study showed that ADs were useful to generate inter-segmental motion at surgical level. And the un-constraint type of AD had higher mobility than semi-constraint one. However, high mobility of ADs would lead not only higher facet joint forces but also ligament stresses than intact cervical spine. Therefore, more careful care must be taken to choose surgical method of total disc arthroplasty.