Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_IV | Pages 421 - 421
1 Apr 2004
Conditt M Ismaily S Paravic V Noble P
Full Access

Wear of the underside of modular tibial inserts (“backside wear”) has been reported by several authors. However, the actual volume of material lost through wear of the backside surface has not been quantified. This study reports the results of computerized measurements of tibial inserts of one design known to have a high incidence of backside wear in situ.

A series of retrieved TKA components of one design (AMK, Depuy) with evidence of severe backside wear and extrusions of the polyethylene insert were examined. The three-dimensional surface profile of the backside of each insert was digitized and reconstructed with CAD software (UniGraphics). The volume of material removed was calculated from the volume between the worn backside surface and an “initial” surface defined by unworn areas.

Computer reconstructions showed that in all retrievals, the unworn surface of the remaining pegs, the rim of material extruded over the medial edge and unworn surfaces on the anterior-lateral edge all lie in a single plane. This demonstrates that the “pegs” present on the backside of these inserts correspond to residual, unworn protrusions remaining on each retrieved component and do not represent cold flow extrusions through the base plate holes. The average volume of material lost due to backside wear was 608mm^3 ± 339mm^3 (range:80–1599 mm^3). This corresponds to an average loss of 569mg and an average linear wear rate of 103mg/year, based on the time in situ for each implant.

The volume of material removed due to backside wear is significant and is of a magnitude large enough to generate osteolysis. Our results indicate that the appearance of pegs on the underside of components with screw holes on the baseplate are not due to creep, but instead are due to severe wear of the insert. The mechanisms of material removed due to pitting and burnishing actually produce debris of a size more damaging in terms of osteolysis than wear at the articulating surface making it clear that significant improvements in implant design are needed to prevent backside wear and osteolysis.