Transportal technique of femoral drilling allows the femoral tunnel to be placed in anatomic location. The study was conducted to evaluate the orientation of ACL graft performed by two different techniques and compared to orientation of native ACL. 50 patients (Group A) underwent ACL reconstruction with transtibial technique using transfix on the femoral side and 30 patients (Group B) underwent ACL reconstruction with transportal technique using endobutton. We used quadrupled hamstrings graft and tibial fixation was achieved with bio-absorbable screws. All patients were evaluated with 3 Tesla MRI at 6 months post-operatively and femoral tunnel angle in coronal plane (FTA), tibial tunnel angle (TTA) in sagittal plane, graft angle in coronal plane (GA coronal), graft angle in sagittal plane (GA sagittal), and graft- Blumensaat line angle (GBLA) were measured. A control group of patients (Group C, n=50)was also included to evaluate the orientation of native ACL.Introduction
Materials/Methods
Transportal technique of femoral drilling allows the femoral tunnel to be placed in anatomic location. The study was conducted to evaluate the orientation of ACL graft performed by two different techniques and compared to orientation of native ACL. 50 patients (Group A) underwent ACL reconstruction with transtibial technique using transfix on the femoral side and 30 patients (Group B) underwent ACL reconstruction with transportal technique using endobutton. We used quadrupled hamstrings graft and tibial fixation was achieved with bioabsorbable screws. All patients were evaluated with 3 Tesla MRI at 6 months post-operatively and femoral tunnel angle in coronal plane (FTA), tibial tunnel angle (TTA) in sagittal plane, graft angle in coronal plane (GA coronal), graft angle in sagittal plane (GA sagittal), and graft-Blumensaat line angle (GBLA) were measured. A control group of patients (Group C, n=50)was also included to evaluate the orientation of native ACL. The femoral tunnel angle (FTA) was significantly lower in group B as compared to group A, 54.03±5.05 vs 71.6±6.02, p<0.05. The tibial tunnel angle (TTA) was similar in group A and B, 65±5.2 vs. 62.9±4.5, p>0.05. Graft angle in coronal plane (GA coronal) was significantly lower in group B when compared to group A, 62.4±5.6 vs 72.5±5.5, p<0.05, and there was no significant difference between group B and C. Similarly graft angle in sagittal plane (GA sagittal) in group B was found to be significantly lower as compared to group A and similar to group C, 51.2±4.3 vs 65.3±3.6, p<0.05. The graft-Blumensaat line angle (GBLA) was significantly lower in group B as compared to Group A, 8.6±1.4 vs 13.5±1.2, p<0.05. The orientation of the reconstructed ligament was found to be closer to the native ACL in transportal technique of femoral drilling.
