Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 9 - 9
1 May 2014
Heil K Wood A Oakley E
Full Access

Freezing cold injuries (Frostnip and Frostbite) (FCI) have become uncommon in UK military personnel relative to non-freezing cold injuries (NFCI, ‘trench foot’). However if unidentified or inappropriately treated they may lead to avoidable medical downgrading or discharge. JSP 539 recommends delay or avoidance of surgical debridement where possible.

An anonymised retrospective audit was performed of FMED7 medical reports of cases seen in the Institute of Naval Medicine Cold Injury Clinic (CIC) between July 2002 and January 2014 inclusive.

In all 149 FCI cases were identified, 71 affected hands only of which 34 were bilateral, and 58 affected feet only, 34 of those being bilateral. A total of 17 patients had injured both hands and feet, with 10 bilateral. Royal Marines accounted for half of these cases, with the Army making up a further third, and the Royal Navy and RAF making up the remainder. Most FCI were found to have occurred in Norway, with Marine ranks being most commonly affected. Ten cases underwent surgery: aspiration of blisters, debridement of tissue, or amputation. Seven of these procedures took place prematurely, which appeared detrimental to recovery. No patients required fasciotomy.

FCI are uncommon, but in arctic conditions their risk rises dramatically. The best treatment is conservative where possible following JSP 539 guidelines and consultation with CIC should occur at the earliest possibility. The Potential benefits of surgery must be weighed against problems of injured tissue healing and expert opinion should be obtained.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 107 - 107
1 Jan 2013
Oakley E Sanghrajka A Fernandes J Flowers M Jones S
Full Access

Aim

To investigate the effectiveness of a decision-based protocol designed to minimise the use of medial incisions when performing crossed-wire fixation of supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus whilst minimising ulnar nerve injury.

Method

We have employed a protocol for placing the medial wire during crossed k-wire fixation of supracondylar fractures dependent upon the medial epicondyle. When this is palpable, the wire is introduced percutaneously; when it is not, a mini-incision is made.

All cases of closed reduction and crossed K-wiring of supracondylar fracture over a three year period (2008–2011) were identified from our department database. Cases with a neurological injury identified pre-operatively, and those in which the protocol had not been followed were excluded. Casenotes were reviewed to determine the incidence and outcomes of post-operative ulnar nerve deficit.