As life expectancy in the population rises, osteoporotic fractures are seen most frequently in the vertebral column. Percutaneous kyphoplasty is increasingly used for pain reduction and stabilization in these patients, but the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and safety of the procedure remain uncertain. To clarify whether kyphoplasty has additional value compared with optimum pain treatment in patients with acute vertebral fractures.BACKGROUND
OBJECTIVE
Osteoporosis with subsequent osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures is an increasingly important disease due not only to its significant economic impact but also to the increasing age of our population. Pain reduction and stabilization are of primary importance with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. To compare the efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures.BACKGROUND
OBJECTIVE
To compare the early functional and clinical results, between single (SB) and double-bundle (DB) of Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstrings (HS). Thirty-six patients from 17 to 36 years old (average age 23), 22 ♂ and 14 ♀, from January 2006 to May 2008, were randomly allocated for ACL reconstruction with HS (SB – DB). Eighteen patients underwent a 4-stranded SB reconstruction (group A) and the remaining 18 underwent an anatomic, 2-stranded DB ACL reconstruction with 2 tibial and 2 femoral tunnel technique (group B), by using the Smith &
Nephew instrumentation system. The follow-up was from 8 to 22 months (average 16 months) for both groups and included clinical evaluation (pivot-shift test, anterior laxity test with KT-1000 arthrometer and Lysholm knee score) and radiographs. There were no statistically significant difference in the results between the 2 groups with regard to the pivot-shift test and the Lysholm score (SB: mean 91, DB: mean 89) (Mann-Whitney test, T-test). The anterior laxity was not significantly different between group A (mean, 2.2mm) and group B (mean, 0.9mm), according to KT-1000 measurements. Rotational stability, as evaluated by pivot-shift test, was better in group B than in group A, but statistical analysis showed no significant difference. The average operation time was longer in DB (110 min) compared to SB (80 min). There were no infections, though one patient of each group was found to be complicated with fixed flexion and extension lag >
5°; and underwent arthroscopic lysis. Our study shows no statistically significant advantage of DB versus SB ACL reconstruction, concerning the clinical evaluations and the complications
The aim of our study was to examine the outcome of ACL reconstruction by using four strand hamstring tendon autografts.
5 patients had laxity >
3mm when compared to the healthy knee by using the KT-1000 arhthrometric testing. 2 of the latter patients complained of a feeling of knee joint instability which occurred due to inaccurate positioning of the femoral tunnel. In 2 cases the transfix pins were displaced and removed on the 4th and 15th post-operative month. The tunnel expansion was measured by an X-Ray or a CT scan. The tibial tunnel expansion was 0–2.5mm (mean 1.2) or 18% and the femoral tunnel expansion was 0–3 mm (mean 1.4) or 26%. 8 patients reported mild pain which did not restrict their activities. A 5 degree loss of extension was noticed in one patient who continues physiotherapy. 28 of the above patients suffered also from a meniscal injury that was managed arthroscopically.