Trunnion wear has been reported as a cause for failure of modern total hip replacement implants. While there are several reports on the prevalence of trunnion corrosion with specific stem designs, little is known about the prevalence of this problem across other femoral stem designs. The purpose of this study is to review three commonly used uncemented femoral stems and to correlate any established risk factors with rates of revision. We reviewed all patients followed prospectively over a 15-year period (March 2000 to September 2015) who underwent total hip arthroplasty with one of three modern uncemented femoral stem designs. All of the stems were made of titanium (Ti6Al4V alloy) with a 12/14 taper design. We included only metal (cobalt chromium) on highly cross-linked polyethylene articulations. We evaluated age, gender, body mass index (BMI), femoral head size, head length, neck angle and offset as potential risk factors for all cause revision and revision excluding infection by univariate analysis. We performed a logistic regression analysis with odds ratios (OR) for each parameter for both all cause revision as well as with infection excluded. We used a p value of <0.05 as a level of significance.Introduction
Methods
Surgeons performing a total knee replacement (TKR) have two techniques to assist them achieve proper bone resections and ligament tension – gap balancing (GB) and measured resection (MR). GB relies on balancing ligaments prior to bony resections, whereas bony resections are made based on anatomical landmarks in MR. Many studies have been done to compare the implant migration and kinematics between the two techniques, but the results have been varied. However, these studies have not been done on modern anatomically designed prostheses using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Anatomical designs attempt to mimic the normal knee joint structure to return more natural kinematics to the joint, with emphasis on eliminating both paradoxical anterior motion and reduced posterior femoral rollback. Given the major design differences between anatomical and non-anatomical prostheses, it is important to investigate whether one surgical technique may have advantages another. We hypothesize that there would be no difference between GB and MR techniques in implant migration, but that GB might provide better knee kinematics. Patients were recruited to receive an anatomically designed prosthesis and randomized to groups where the GB or MR technique is used. For all patients in the study, RSA images were acquired at a 2 week baseline, as well as at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operatively. These images were used to collect the maximum total point motion (MTPM) of the tibial and femoral implant components relative to the bone using a model-based RSA software. A series of RSA images were also acquired at 3-months post-operatively at different knee flexion angles, ranging in 20° increments from 0° to 100°. Model-based RSA software was used to obtain the 3D positions and orientations of the femoral and tibial components, which were used to obtain the anterior-posterior (AP) contact locations for each condyle.Introduction
Methods
