Introduction

Hind foot Charcot deformity is a disastrous complication of diabetic neuropathy and can lead to instability, ulceration and major amputation. The treatment of these patients is controversial. Internal stabilization and/or external fixation have demonstrated variable results of limb salvage and some authorities thus advise patients to undergo elective major amputation. However, we report a series of 9 diabetic patients with severe hind foot deformity complicated by ulceration in 5/9, who underwent acute corrective internal fixation with successful correction of deformity, healing of ulceration in 4/5 patients and limb salvage in all cases.

Hind foot Charcot deformity is a disastrous complication of diabetic neuropathy and can lead to instability, ulceration and amputation. The treatment of these patients is controversial. Internal stabilisation and external fixation have demonstrated variable results of limb salvage and some authorities thus advise patients to undergo elective amputation. We report a series of 9 diabetic patients with severe hind foot deformity complicated by ulceration in 5/9, who underwent acute corrective internal fixation with successful correction of deformity, healing of ulceration in 4/5 patients and limb salvage in all cases.

Conservative measures such as total contact casting were tried in 5 patients had predominant varus deformity, 2 with valgus deformity and 2 with unstable ankle joints. 5 patients had developed secondary ulceration.

All patients underwent corrective hind foot fusion with tibio-talo-calcaneal arthrodesis using a retrograde intramedullary nail fixation and screws and bone grafting. One patient also with fixed planovalgus deformity of the foot underwent a corrective midfoot reconstruction.

Patients were followed up in a diabetic/orthopaedic multidisciplinary foot clinic and were treated with total contact casting. (Mean follow up time was 15.6 ±6.9months) In all patients the deformity was corrected with successful realignment to achieve a plantigrade foot. Healing of the secondary ulcers was achieved in 4/5 cases and limb salvage was achieved in all cases.

Three patients underwent further surgical procedure to promote bone fusion. One patient required removal of a significantly displaced fixation screw. Two patients had postoperative wound infections which that were treated with initially intravenous antibiotic therapy and then negative pressure wound therapy.

In conclusion, internal fixation for severe hind foot deformity together with close follow up in a multidisciplinary diabetic/orthopaedic foot clinic can be successful in diabetic patients with advanced Charcot osteoarthropathy and secondary ulceration.

Introduction: The ideal regimen for safe and effective post operative pain relief inspinal surgery remains elusive. Numerous studies have been conducted comparing epidural with patient controlled analgesia with no firm conclusion as to which is best.

Aims: To determine the efficacy of acute pain relief between surgical placed epidural catheter and patient controlled analgesia for lumbar spinal surgery.

Method: A 42 month retrospective survey of 82 spinal surgery patients case notes and anaesthetic charts performed by a consultant spinal surgeon and his registrar from 2002 to 2005. There were 34 epidural and 48 PCA patients. Visual analogue Score (0–10) at 6 hourly intervals up to 36 hours, complications and age of patient were looked at. Exclusion criteria for epidural were dural tear, history of hypotension, unexplained neurological symptoms, and bleeding disorders and surgeon choice. Epidural infusion consisted of bupivacaine 0.1% with 5mls loading dose and 10mls/ hour infusion and PCA consisted of morphine sulphate 2mg/ml with a 1ml loading dose and 5 minute lockout interval.All patients were on standard analgesia which included oromorph 5mg four hourly orally and paracetamol 1gram six hourly as required orally. No radiographic evidence of epidural catheter placement was performed. Post-operative complications which included hypotension, nausea, vomiting, and drowsiness were monitored.

Results: The average age for the epidural group was 46.9 and PCA group 49.8. The most striking finding was that the average pain score at each six hourly interval waslower in the epidural group. This was significant in the first 18 hours post-operatively.However, 3 complications occurred in the epidural group which included hypotension. In addition, 3 epidural infusions were stopped and changed to PCA most likely due to improper placement of catheter. There were no complications with the PCA group.

Conclusion: This observational study demonstrates clinically and statistically that in the acute post-operative phase and up to 36 hours that epidural analgesia for lumbar spine surgery is more effective than PCA. From this survey, the risk of epidural was higher, although no serious complications occurred. Surgeon placement of catheter is also important in the effective delivery of epidural pain relief. The lower efficacy of the PCA may have been due to poor patient understanding of the concept of PCA and thereforeits

Computer aided joint replacement surgery has become very popular during recent years and is being done in increasing numbers all over the world. The accuracy of the system depends to a major extent, on accurate registration and immobility of the tracker attachment devices to the bone. This study was designed to assess the forces needed to displace the tracker attachment devices in the bone simulators.

Bone simulators were used to maintain the uniformity of the bone structure during the study. The fixation devices tested were 3mm diameter self drilling, self tapping threaded pin, 4mm diameter self tapping cortical threaded pin, 5mm diameter self tapping cancellous threaded pin and a triplanar fixation device ‘ortholock’ used with three 3mm pins. All the devices were tested for pull out, translational and rotational forces in unicortical and bicortical fixation modes. Also tested was the normal bang strength and forces generated by leaning on the devices.

The forces required to produce translation increased with the increasing diameter of the pins. These were 105 N, 185 N, and 225 N for the unicortical fixations and 130N, 200N, 225 N for the bicortical fixations for 3mm, 4mm and 5 mm diameter pins respectively. The forces required to pull out the pins were 1475N, 1650N, 2050N for the unicortical, 1020N, 3044N and 3042N for the bicortical fixated 3mm, 4mm and 5mm diameter pins. The ortholock translational and pull out strength was tested to 900N and 920N respectively and still it did not fail. Rotatory forces required to displace the tracker on pins was to the magnitude of 30N before failure. The ortholock device had rotational forces applied up to 135N and still did not fail. The manual leaning forces and the sudden bang forces generated were of the magnitude of 210 N and 150 N respectively.

The strength of the fixation pins increases with increasing diameter from three to five mm for the translational forces. There is no significant difference in pull out forces of four mm and five mm diameter pins though it is more than the three mm diameter pins. This is because of the failure of material at that stage rather than the fixation device. The rotatory forces required to displace the tracker are very small and much less than that can be produced by the accidental leaning or bang produced by the surgeon or assistants in single pins. Although the ortholock device was tested to 135 N in rotation without failing, one has to be very careful not to put any forces during the operation on the tracker devices to ensure the accuracy of the procedure.

Purpose of the study: To establish the difference between AO plate osteosynthesis and Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing and the long-term outcome.

Design: Prospective randomised study.

Material: During 2000 and 2002 prospective randomised study was carried out where children with diaphysial fracture of long bone was either treated with osteosynthesis with AO plate or ESIN. 32 children had AO plate osteosynthesis and 34 children had ESIN procedure.

Methods: In our series of patients managed with ESIN Nailing 24 had forearm fracture 6 had femur fracture 2 had humeral and 2 had tibial fracture. The other group with AO plate osteosynthesis had 25-forearm fracture 1 humeral fracture 4 tibial fractures and 2 femoral fractures.

Results: The group treated with AO plate osteosynthesis 2 had rotational deformity and rest did well. The recovery period after removal of metal work was longer.

The group treated with ESIN procedure 1 patient fell down and bend the C-Nail, which was straightened in situ, and the fracture healed with slight curvature of the femur, which corrected slowly with growth. The forearm fractures did not have any rotational deformity. The recovery period post removal of the ESIN was very short.

Conclusion: We find that ESIN is a superior procedure for diaphysial fractures of long bone in children and AO plating should only be done in cases where ESIN is not possible.

Background context: Cauda equina following a prosthetic Disc nucleus replacement has never been reported.

Purpose: To describe a case of Cauda equina following migration of the Prosthetic disc nucleus and possible cause.

Study design: Case report and review of literature.

Patient Sample: Case report.

Outcome measures: 2 patients. Report of presenting symptoms and review of radiographs.

Method/description: A 24-year-old man presented with progressively worsening pain radiating down his right leg and low back pain. His MRI scan showed a disc bulge at L4/5 for which we underwent decompression and discetomy. 4 months later he presented again with same symptoms. MRI imaging showed a disc prolapse at L4/5. He underwent a revision decompression discectomy and a prosthetic disc nucleus replacement. On the 4th postoperative day he complained of urinary retention and was unable to move his right ankle with loss of sphincter tone. The plain radiographs showed that the prosthetic disc nucleus had migrated posteriorly. He was immediately taken to theatre, which showed posterior migration of the prosthetic disc nucleus compressing the theca and displacing the nerve root. The prosthetic disc nucleus was removed from the space relieving the tension of the nerve root and the theca.

Conclusions: Migration of Prosthetic disc nucleus can lead to cauda equina and this needs to be explained to the patient as possible risk factor. The angle of the vertebrae has to be measured before selecting a patient. If angle below 5 degree it is a high risk patient.