Oxidation of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) can lead to failure of implants used in total joints. Cyclic loading is postulated to be one mechanism of in vivo oxidation in UHMWPE components as one previous study has shown [1]. We developed an accelerated aging test that incorporated compressive cyclic loading that the UHMWPE components would be exposed to in vivo. Surgeons are moving towards larger femoral heads in hip arthroplasty and removing less bone in knee arthroplasty necessitating thinner UHMWPE components. We hypothesized that, in this accelerated aging test, thinner UHMWPE components would be more susceptible to oxidation caused by the cyclic loading due to higher stresses in the material. All samples tested in this study were Conventional PE: GUR1050 was machined into test specimens, vacuum packaged and gamma sterilized. Test samples were blocks 100 mm × 89 mm in cross-section with 3 different thicknesses: 1 mm, 3 mm, and 10 mm (n=3 each). Three cylinders were cored out of each test sample to serve as controls (Fig 1a) that were physically separated and thereby isolating the oxidation attributable to an applied compressive cyclic load. The controls were placed back into the holes from where they were cored during testing. Compressive loading was administered by a 12.5 mm diameter applicator affixed to a hydraulic test frame (Fig 1b), and all testing was done at 80°C in air. A sinusoidal compressive cyclic stress between 1 and 10 MPa was applied at 5 Hz for 7 days. Microtomed thin films from all samples were analyzed via Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) to quantify oxidation [2] after testing. Oxidation was measured through the thickness of the sample at targeted points along the length from directly underneath the center of the load applicator to 10mm away (Fig 1a). Oxidation was also measured through the thickness of the cylindrical controls.Introduction
Materials and Methods
The fatigue strength of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in total joint implants is crucial to its long term success in high demand applications, such as in the knee, and is typically determined by measuring the crack propagation resistance in razor-notched specimens under cyclic load [1]. This only tells part of the story: that is, how well the material resists crack propagation once a crack is present. A second, equally important component of fatigue strength is how well the material resists crack formation. Previous studies cyclically loaded a cantilevered post until failure [2], postulating that the post would break very quickly after crack initiation. Parran The following UHMWPE formulations were tested: (i) virgin, (ii) gamma sterilized in vacuum, (iii) 91 kGy gamma irradiated, and (iv) 91 kGy gamma irradiated and subsequently melted. GUR1020 and GUR1050 bar stock of varying irradiation doses were machined into compact tension specimens [4] with a notch depth of 17 mm and a blunt notch root radius of 0.25 mm, mimicking a geometry of a joint replacement component. Specimens were held in constant tension until failure; 3 to 5 different loads between 1 kN and 2.25 kN (n=3 samples per load per material) were tested. A video camera was focused on the face of the notch and took a picture every 10 seconds. The photos were reviewed to manually determine the crack initiation time (Fig 1). The time it took for the sample to completely fail – that is, shear into two separate pieces – was also recorded.Introduction
Materials and Methods
Radiation crosslinking decreases the wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and subsequent heating increases its oxidative stability. Clinical trials are showing lower femoral head penetration rate with highly crosslinked vs. conventional UHMWPE liners. Recently, a follow-up report showed a surprising increase in the femoral head penetration rate with a highly crosslinked UHMWPE, prompting us to closely analyze surgically explanted highly crosslinked UHMWPEs. Thirty-four highly crosslinked components, all irradiated (100kGy) and melted, were included in the study. The components were surgically removed from patients for non-polyethylene related reasons. Oxidation was determined at the rim immediately after explantation. After shelf storage in air for 5–77 months, oxidation and crosslink density were measured at the rim and articular surfaces. An additional retrieval (92 mos. in vivo) was tested on the hip simulator; oxidation and crosslink density were determined after simulator testing. All components showed no detectable oxidation immediately after explantation; however, surprisingly oxidation levels increased during shelf storage. Areas with increased oxidation showed a decrease in crosslink density. These changes did not correlate with in vivo duration; however, they correlated strongly with ex vivo duration. The component subjected to hip simulator testing showed no measurable wear and showed no detectable oxidation or marked decrease in crosslink density. Two mechanisms may have reduced the oxidation resistance of highly crosslinked UHMWPE upon exposure to in vivo elements and subsequent exposure to air. One mechanism is based on free radical formation during cyclic loading; the other is based on an oxidation cascade initiated by absorbed lipids. Further studies are necessary to determine the impact of these mechanisms, if any, on the stability of components during in vivo service.
