This study aimed to identify the success rate of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a large prospective cohort of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The ability for different PJI classification systems to predict DAIR success was assessed.

A prospective, multicenter study of PJIs occurring between July 2014 and December 2017 in 27 hospitals across Australia and New Zealand was performed. First time PJIs following primary TKA that were managed with DAIR were analyzed. DAIR success was defined as the patient being alive with documented absence of clinical or microbiological evidence of infection and no ongoing antibiotics for the index joint at 2-year follow-up. Multivariate analysis was performed for multiple PJI classification systems to assess their ability to predict DAIR success using their respective definitions of “early” PJI (Coventry ≤1 month, International Consensus Meeting ≤90 days or Auckland <1 year), or as hematogenous versus chronic PJI (Tsukayama).

189 PJIs were managed with DAIR, with an overall success rate of 45% (85/189). Early PJIs had a higher rate of DAIR success when analyzed according to the Coventry system (adjusted odds ratio = 3.85, p = 0.008), the ICM system (adjusted odds ratio = 3.08, p = 0.005) and the Auckland system (adjusted odds ratio = 2.60, p = 0.01). DAIR success was lower in both hematogenous (adjusted odds ratio = 0.36, p = 0.034) and chronic PJIs (adjusted odds ratio = 0.14, p = 0.003) occurring more than one year since the primary TKA.

DAIR success is highest when performed in infections occurring within one year of the primary TKA. Late infections had a high DAIR failure rate irrespective of their classification as hematogenous or chronic. Time since primary is a useful predictor of DAIR success.

The optimum indications for debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) are unclear. Previous studies have demonstrated higher success rate of DAIR within one year of the primary arthroplasty. This study aimed to compare the success rate of DAIR vs revision in “early” and “late” infections to provide guidance for clinical decision making.

The Prosthetic Joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand Observational (PIANO) cohort prospectively recorded PJIs between July 2014 and December 2017 in 27 hospitals. This study included PIANO patients with first time PJIs occurring after primary TKA. Treatment success was defined as the patient being alive, free from further revision and without clinical or microbiological evidence of reinfection at two years follow-up.

“Early” and “late” infections were analyzed separately. Univariate analysis compared demographic and disease specific factors between the DAIR and Revision groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression identified whether treatment strategy and other risk factors were associated with treatment success in “early” and “late” infections.

In 117 “early” (<1 year) infections, treatment success rate was 56% in the DAIR group and 54% in the revision group (p=0.878). No independent risk factors were associated with treatment outcome on multivariate analysis.

In 134 “late” (>1 year) infections, treatment success rate was 34.4% in the DAIR group and 60.5% in the revision group (OR 3.07 p=0.006). On multivariate analysis, revision was associated with 2.47x higher odds of success (p=0.041) when compared to DAIR, patients with at least one significant co-morbidity (OR 2.27, p=0.045) or with Staphylococcus aureus PJIs (OR 2.5, p=0.042) had higher odds of failure.

In “late” PJIs occurring >1 year following primary TKA, treatment strategy with revision rather than DAIR was associated with greater success. Patients with significant comorbidities and Staphylococcus aureus PJIs were at higher risk of failure regardless of treatment strategy.

Aim

Culture negative (CN) prosthetic joint infections (PJI) account for approximately 10% of all PJIs and present significant challenges for clinicians. We aimed to explore the significance of CN PJI within a large prospective cohort study, and to compare their characteristics and outcomes with culture positive cases.