Introduction

Primary malign tumors and solitary metastatic lesions of the thoracic and thoracolumbar spine are indications for radical en bloc resections. Extracompartimental tumor infiltration makes the achievement of adequate oncological resection more difficult and requires an extension of the resection margins. We present a retrospective clinical study of patients that underwent chest wall resection in combination with vertebrectomy due to sarcomas and solitary metastases for assessing the clinical outcome especially focusing on onco-surgical results.

Introduction: Total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) as the only radical treatment option for sarcoma and solitary metastases of the spine was shown to markedly minimize local recurrences, improve patient quality of life and substantially increase overall survival rates. Due to surgical difficulty of TES and complex biomechanical demands in defect reconstruction multisegmental tumor involvement of the spine has long been considered as a palliative situation, exceeding the limits of surgical feasibility. Thus, multilevel resections reports are very rare. For the first time, this study analyzes the onco-surgical results after multilevel thoracolumbar TES and reconstruction with a carbon composite vertebral body replacement system (CC-VBR) in a collective of patients.

Methods: 18 patients (9f/9m; age 52±14y) treated with thoracolumbar multilevel TES (6x2, 9x3, 3x4 segments) for spinal sarcomas (n=9), solitary metastases (n=5) and aggressive primary tumors (n=3) were retrospectively investigated. According to the classification system of Tomita et al. all patients were surgically staged as type 6 (multisegmental/extracompartimental). Defect reconstruction (11 thoracic, 3 thoracolumbar and 4 lumbar) were performed with posterior stabilization and a CC-VBR. Patient charts and the current clinical follow-up results were analyzed for histopathological tumor type, pre- and postoperative data (symptoms, duration of surgery, blood loss, complications, intensive care, adjuvant therapies etc.) and course of disease. Latest radiographs and CT-scans were analyzed at follow up. Oncological status was evaluated using cumulative disease specific and metastases-free survival analysis.

Results: With a mean follow up (100%) of 18 (4–44) months 17 patients (94%) were postoperatively ambulatory without any support. Postoperative neurological deficits were seen in one patient (6%). Wide resection margins were attained in 7, marginal in 11 patients. Depending on tumor biology/grading and/or resections margins an adjuvant therapy (radiation/chemotherapy) was performed in 12 (67%) patients. Local recurrence was found in one patient (6%). 13 (72%) patients showed no evidence of disease, 3 were alive with disease while 2 died of disease at 10 and 27 months postoperatively.

Conclusion: In selected patients with multisegmental spinal tumor involvement oncological sufficient resections can be reached by multilevel TES. Although the surgical procedure is challenging and the patient’s stress is considerable our encouraging midterm results together with the low complication rate clearly favour and legitimate this technique. However, treatment success strongly depends on adjuvant therapies. Reconstruction with a CC-VBR showed low complication rates, promising biomechanical characteristics, increased volume for bone grafting and lower artefact rates in follow-up MR- and CT-imaging.