Children undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for neuromuscular and syndromic scoliosis were admitted to the paediatric intensive care (PIC) until about 6 years ago, at which time we created a new unit, a hospital floor-based spinal high-dependency unit-plus (SHDU-plus), in response to frequent bed-shortage cancellations. This study compares postoperative management on PIC with HDU-plus for these non-hospital floor suitable children with syndromic and neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing PSF.

Retrospective review of 100 consecutive children with syndromic and neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing PSF between June 2016 and January 2022. Inclusion criteria were: 1) diagnosis of syndromic or neuromuscular scoliosis, 2) underwent PSF, 3) not suitable for immediate postoperative hospital floor-based care. Exclusion criteria were children with significant cardio-respiratory co-morbidity requiring PIC postoperatively.

55 patients were managed postoperatively on PIC and 45 on SHDU-plus. No significant difference between groups was found with respect to age, weight, ASA grade, preoperative Cobb angles, operative duration, number of levels fused and estimated blood loss. 4 patients in the PIC group and 1 in the SHDU-plus group were readmitted back to PIC or HDU following step-down to the hospital floor. Average length of stay was 2 days on PIC and 1 day on SHDU-plus. Average total length of hospital stay was 16.5 days in the PIC group and 10.5 days in the HDU-plus group. 19 (35%) patients developed complications in the PIC group, compared to 18 (40%) in SHDU-plus. Mean specialist unit charge per day was less on SHDU-plus compared with PIC. There were no bed-shortage cancellations in the SHDU-plus group, compared to 11 in the PIC group.

For children with neuromuscular or syndromic scoliosis undergoing PSF and deemed not suitable for post-operative care on the hospital floor, creation of a SHDU-plus was associated with fewer readmissions back to PIC or HDU, shorter hospital stays, an equivalent complication rate, significant cost-saving and fewer cancellations. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III.

We report our five-year functional results comparing navigated and conventional total knee replacement. To our knowlege this represents the first Level 1 study comparing function in navigated and conventional total knee replacement at five years.

An origianl cohort of 71 patients undergoing Duracon (Stryker Orthopaedics, St. Leonards, Australia) total knee replacement without patellar resurfacing were prospectively randomised to undergo operation using computer navigation (Stryker Image Free Computer Navigation System (version 1.0; Stryker Orthopaedics))(n=35) or a jig-based method (n=36). The two groups were matched for age, gender, height, weight, BMI, ASA grade abd pre-operative deformity. All operations were performed by a single surgeon. Reviews were undertaken by senior physiotherpist blinded to participant status using validated outcome scoring tools (Knee Society Score, WOMAC Score and Short Form SF-36 Score). All patients underwent CT scanning of the implanted prosthesis as per Perth CT Knee Protocol to assess component alignment.

After 5 years 24 patients in the navigated group and 22 patients in the conventional group were available for review. At 5 years no statistically significant difference was seen in any of the aforementioned outcome scores when comparing navigated and conventional groups. No statistically significant differencewas seen between 2- and 5-year results for either group.

Due to the relatively low numbers in each group these data were compared with retrospective cohorts of navigated (n=100) and conventional (n=70) Duracon total knee replacements performed outwith this study over the same 5-year period. WITHIN the retrospective cohorts no statistically significant differences were found when comparing any of the aforementioned outcome scores. In addition, when comparing parallel scores between prospective and retrospective groups again no statistically significant differences were identified.

At 5-years post-operatively the functional outcome between computer navigated and conventional total knee replacement appears to be no different despite the better alignment achieved using navigation.