Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_18 | Pages 6 - 6
14 Nov 2024
Karjalainen L Lähdesmäki M Ylitalo A Eskelinen A Mattila VM Repo J
Full Access

Background

Cephalomedullary nails are widely used for fixation of unstable pertrochanteric fractures. In 2018, the Depuy Synthes Trochanteric Fixation Nail - Advanced (TFNA) implant was introduced at a level I academic trauma center. Thereafter, the TFNA swiftly replaced the older implant models used at the time. Subsequently, clinical concerns were raised about the use of the TFNA due to reports of nail breakage. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the concerns raised about the performance of the TFNA were valid and to assess long-term outcomes.

Methods

The data consisted of 2397 patients who had undergone a proximal femoral hip fracture procedure between 2014 and 2020. Data were handpicked from patient records. TFNA was compared with TFN, PFNA, Gamma3, and Intertan regarding nail breakage, breakage time and long-term outcomes.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_18 | Pages 121 - 121
14 Nov 2024
Lähdesmäki M Ylitalo A Liukkonen R Suominen V Karjalainen L Mattila VM Repo J
Full Access

Introduction

We aimed to study the rates of both surgical and medical complications associated with femoral diaphysis fracture fixation with intramedullary nailing including all fracture mechanisms. Additionally, we investigated whether the trauma energy has an impact on the complication risk.

Method

In this retrospective cohort study, the health records of 491 patients with 503 femoral fractures, who underwent surgery between May 2007 and May 2022 in Tampere University Hospital, were reviewed. Patients who underwent a primary operation with a reamed rigid intramedullary nail for a diaphyseal femoral fracture and whose follow-ups were organized at the same hospital district, were included. Based on those criteria, 57.5% were included for analysis (279 patients with 289 fractures). The complications were then recorded by chart review. To investigate the impact of trauma energy on complication risk, we compared complication proportions in high- and low-energy groups and calculated odds ratios.