The role of the (PCL) in modulating knee kinematics has been well documented. We asked whether function of the (PCL) would be better preserved by incorporating a three-dimensional model for planning and placement. We evaluated patients (n=59) enrolled into a, prospective, study of conventional instrumentation (25) vs. 3D modeling (34) for (CR) TKA from July 2016 to Feb 2018. Follow-up included clinical exams, PROMs, and serial radiographs up to 24 months after surgery. We measured kinematic patterns radiographically at two years postoperatively. Variables were compared using simple linear regression, one-way ANOVA, and Fisher's exact test. We hypothesized that: 1. well-preserved PCL would demonstrate a more normal kinematic pattern of increasing rollback with increasing knee flexion without paradoxical movement, and 2. this pattern would be associated with improved intra- and post-operative motion and function.Introduction
Methods
Component position and overall limb alignment following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been shown to influence prosthetic survivorship and clinical outcomes1. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy to plan of three-dimensional modeled (3D) TKA with manual TKA for component alignment and position. An open-label prospective clinical study was conducted to compare 3D modeling with manual TKA (non-randomized) at 4 U.S. centers between July 2016 and August 2018. Men and women aged > 18 with body mass index < 40kg/m2 scheduled for unilateral primary TKA were recruited for the study. 144 3DTKA and 86 manual TKA (230 patients) were included in the analysis of accuracy outcomes. Seven high-volume, arthroplasty fellowship-trained surgeons performed the surgeries. The surgeon targeted a neutral (0°) mechanical axis for all except 9 patients (4%) for whom the target was within 0°±3°. Computed tomography (CT) scans obtained approximately 6 weeks post-operatively were analyzed using anatomical landmarks to determine femoral and tibial component varus/valgus position, femoral component internal/external rotation, and tibial component posterior slope. Absolute deviation from surgical plan was defined as the absolute value of the difference between the CT measurement and the surgeon's operative plan. Smaller absolute deviation from plan indicated greater accuracy. Mean component positions for manual and 3DTKA groups were compared using two-sample t tests for unequal variances. Differences of absolute deviations from plan were compared using stratified Wilcoxon tests, which controlled for study center and accounted for skewed distributions of the absolute values. Alpha was 0.05 two-sided. At the time of this report, CT measurements of femoral component rotation position referenced from the posterior condylar axis were not yet completed; therefore, the current analysis of femoral component rotation accuracy to plan reflects one center that exclusively used manual instruments referencing the transepicondylar axis (TEA).Introduction
Methods
