Background

Patients with hand injuries frequently present to Emergency Departments. The ability of junior doctors to perform an accurate clinical assessment is crucial in initiating appropriate management.

Introduction: There is a recent trend of using a raft of small diameter 3.5 mm cortical screws instead of the large diameter 6.5mm screws in depressed tibial plateau fractures. Our aim was to compare the biomechanical properties of these two constructs in the normal and osteoporotic synthetic bone model.

Methods: 20 rigid polyurethane foam blocks with a density simulating osteoporotic bone and normal bone were obtained. A Schatzker type 3 fracture was created in each block. The fracture fragments were then elevated and supported using 2, 6.5mm cancellous screws or 4, 3.5mm cortical screws.

The fractures were loaded using a Lloyd’s machine and a load displacement curve was plotted.

Results: Osteoporotic model. The mean force needed to produce a depression of 5mm was 700.8N with the 4-screw construct and 512.4N with the 2 screw construct (p=0.007).

Non-osteoporotic model. The mean force requires to produce the same depression was 1878.2N with the 2-screw construct and 1938.2N with the 4 screw construct (p=0.42).

An increased fragmentation of the synthetic bone fragments was noticed with the 2-screw construct but not with the 4-screw construct.

Conclusion: A raft of 4, 3.5 mm cortical screws is biomechanically stronger than two, 6.5mm cancellous screws in resisting axial compression in osteoporotic bone.

Introduction and aims: There is a recent trend of using a raft of small diameter 3.5 mm cortical screws instead of the large diameter 6.5mm screws in depressed tibial plateau fractures (Schatzker type 3). Our aim was to compare the biomechanical properties of these two constructs in the normal and osteoporotic sawbone model.

Methods: 10 sawbone (solid rigid polyurethane foam) blocks with a density simulating that of an osteoporotic bone and 10 blocks of a density simulating normal bone were obtained. A Schatzker type 3 fracture was created in each block. The fracture fragments were then elevated and supported using 2, 6.5mm cancellous screws in 10 blocks and 4, 3.5mm cortical screws in the remaining.

The models were loaded to failure using a Lloyd’s machine. A displacement (depression) of 5mm was taken to be the point of failure. A load displacement curve was plotted using Nexygen software and the force needed to cause a depression of 5mm was calculated in each block. Mann Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Osteoporotic model

The mean force needed to produce a depression of 5mm was 700.8N with the 4-screw construct and 512.4N with the 2 screw construct. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.007).

Non-osteoporotic model

The mean force requires to produce the same depression was 1878.2N with the 2-screw construct and 1938.2N with the 4 screw construct. The difference was not statistically significant (p=0.42).

An increased fragmentation of the sawbone fragments was noticed with the 2-screw construct but not with the 4-screw construct.

Conclusion: A raft of 4, 3.5 mm cortical screws is biomechanically stronger than 2, 6.5mm cancellous screws in resisting axial compression in osteoporotic bone.

Introduction We have evaluated the early outcome of arthroscopic excision of the distal clavicle (Mumford procedure) for acromioclavicular joint pathology.

Method Forty-one patients with acromioclavicular joint pathology underwent arthroscopic distal clavicle resections between 2002 and 2004. Preoperatively, all patients had acromioclavicular joint tenderness, 90% had a positive horizontal adduction test and 62% had a positive O’Brien’s AC compression test. All provocative signs were abolished on re-examination after acromio-clavicular joint injection. Surgery was indicated with failure of conservative management. Surgery was performed through a subacromial approach to the acromio-clavicular joint, using a Acromionizer (Smith-Nephew Dyonics, Andover, MA) burr through the anterosuperior portal. A supplementary Neviaser portal was used in 9 cases. Patients were clinically assessed at average of 18 months post surgery (range; 9–36). Functional rating was obtained with the Constant Score, WORC score and the Oxford Score. Results

Thirty-five patients (85%) reported none or minimal pain. 81% were negative for provocative AC signs. Internal rotation increased by average of 5 vertebrae levels. The Constant, the WORC and Oxford Scores were improved by 23 points, 674 points and 16 points respectively (p< 0.05). 71% reported good or excellent function by the 3^rd post-operative month.

Conclusion The arthroscopic Mumford procedure effectively treats acromioclavicular joint pathology. The procedure has low associated morbidity and high patient satisfaction.

Aim: A case report: Symptomatic Osteochondroma of the Coracoid

Introduction: An osteochondroma is a common developmental tumour of bone characterized by abnormal periphyseal ectopic endochondral ossification. This results in a cartilage-capped subperiosteal bony projection. A solitary osteochondroma is encountered more frequently than are multiple hereditary osteochondromas. They are usually appreciated in the first decades of life and are most commonly located in the long bones, especially the femur, humerus and the tibia. Clinical presentations generally relate to the mass effect of the lesion. These lesions are said to grow to skeletal maturity. Continuous slow growth of the osteochondroma in adults should alert the clinician to the possibility of secondary malignant transformation, usually to a chondroma.

Method: We present an unusual case of shoulder pain in a 36-year-old man with a painful solitary osteochondroma of the coracoid process. Plain radiographs, computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging of the lesion showed a solitary osteochondroma with a visible cartilage cap eroding the under surface of the clavicle. The lesion was surgically explored and excised. Histological examination showed a benign osteochondroma. Removal of the tumour resulted in resolution of all signs and symptoms.

Conclusion: We are aware of no reported cases in the literature of osteochondroma of the coracoid process. This case was unusual in terms of age at clinical presentation and location, suggesting a continuous growth of the tumour beyond skeletal maturity.