Diabetic foot problems are a common cause for hospitalisation in this group and up to 25% of diabetic patients will be affected. Prevalence of diabetes is rising, currently affecting 680000000 people worldwide. The enormity of this problem mandates any strategy that shortens therapeutic period and enhances success rates. Cerament G has been used in our unit as a treatment adjunct in diabetic foot treatment. Successful treatment is viewed as eradication of infection and a functional foot.

Retrospective review of 40 months practice with 115 patients. Inclusion: all diabetic feet requiring surgery Cerament G used, protocol driven Microbiology pathway. Exclusion: Primary closure not possible. Cerament G not used. Outcome assessed in three groups: Total failure (further surgery required); slow to heal (healing by secondary intention); healed without problems.

Healed 99 (eradication of infection and return to function), failure to heal 16 (success rate: 86.1%). Infection was the cause of failure in only in 2.6% (13 failures due to patient noncompliance or poor vascularity). Accepted success rate in treating osteomyelitis in diabetic feet is 68% (medical treatment only), combination of surgery and medical is 86%. Eradication of infection is the only end point return to function is not addressed. This study shows Cerament G with surgery/systemic antibiotics provides a 97.4% success rate.

Therapeutic drivers in this field have been determined traditionally by Physicians and Vascular Surgeons (resection rather than reconstructive surgery.) Our assertion is that eradicating infection in a functionally useless foot is a waste of health resources. Our strategy is always the delivery of an intact functional foot residuum. Cerament G as an adjunct allows this goal in a cost-effective manner.

Purpose

Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome (TTS) was first reported by Keck and Lam separately in 1962. It has been regarded as the lower limb equivalent to Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS). The gold standard of diagnosis proposed over the years is nerve conduction study (NCS). In reality, TTS is much harder to diagnose and treat compared to CTS. Signs and symptoms can be mimicked by other foot and ankle conditions. Our unit had not seen a single positive nerve conduction result of TTS in clinically suspicious cases. We have therefore audited our 10 year experience.

The number of patients in the United Kingdom being admitted with Neck of Femur Fractures (NOF) is increasing each year. Primary first aid for these patients includes adequate analgesia. The commonest forms of analgesia are opioids and in some units regional blockade. However, both have limitations. Regional block is skill dependent while opiates are known to have many side effects.

Paracetamol is an analgesia that is safe and has an excellent side-effect profile within standard doses. Intravenous paracetamol has a far higher predictable bio-availibilty than oral, within standard dosage. This study is to assess the suitability of using intravenous Paracetamol as an alternative.

Method: Prospective study: a change in protocol resulted in all NOF’s admitted under the care of the senior author being prescribed regular intra-venous paracetamol within standard dosage. PRN opioids were available for breakthrough pain. NOF’s admitted under the care of other consultants remained on the established protocol. Opioid usage and pain scores (scale 0–10) were measured.

Results: results of 72 patients were collected, 44 in intravenous paracetamol group and 28 in the control group, having regular opiates and oral paracetamol. There is a 65% reduction in opiate usage in the intravenous paracetamol group (P value= 0.015). There is only a 0.5 difference in average pain score between the two groups (P value= 0.173).

Conclusion: The use of regular intra-venous paracetamol results in a significant reduction in the need for opioid analgesia. The pain relief within this group was comparable to that in the control group. The side-effects of opioids are dose dependent, a reduction in their usage therefore improves both pre and post-operative morbidity by reducing the side effects. A simple change in analgesia protocol to a safer, more predictive agent can result in an improved pre/postoperative period.

Introduction: Classification systems are useful in research and clinical practise as it provides a common mode of communication and evaluation. Tibial pilon injuries are a complex group of fractures, whose classification and radiological assessment in clinical practise remains undetermined.

Methods: 50 CT scans and radiographs of tibial pilon fractures were evaluated independently by 6 orthopaedic surgeons, comprising 3 consultants, 2 registrars and 1 research fellow. Fractures were classified according to ruedi allgower, AO, Topliss et al. Each surgeon was given a period of 48 hours to review copy of the original article as well as written and diagrammatic representations. Assessment was done on two occasions, 4 weeks apart. The kappa coefficient of agreement was calculated with SPSS to determine interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the classification systems. The evaluator was blinded as to treatment and functional outcome. Each evaluator was also asked to decide upon the fracture management based on the classification types and was compared with the actual management.

Result: The interobserver agreement for ruedi allgower, Ao and Topliss et al., was fair, moderate and poor respectively. The intraobserver agreement for ruedi allgower, AO and Topliss et al., classifications was moderate at best. There was poor agreement amongst observers regarding definite management plan based on these classification systems.

Discussion: The interobserver agreement was directly proportional to the familiarity and inversely proportional to the specificity of the classification system. The intraobserver agreement improved with experience. CT scan helped in delineating the fracture segments accurately but did not significantly affect inter or intraob-server agreement.

Conclusion: Existing classification systems help in understanding the pathoanatomy of osseous part of tibial pilon fracture complex. However, Soft tissue injury forms an integral part of this complex. Without inclusion of soft tissue injury, these classification systems have limited role in definitive management.