Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 33 - 33
1 Jul 2022
Ilo K Lodge C Berber R Matar H Bloch B
Full Access

Abstract

Introduction

It is common practice for all patients to have postoperative bloods tests after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However there have been significant improvement in perioperative care with arthroplasty surgery. As healthcare systems and providers strive towards a more efficient service we must re-consider whether such an intervention is necessary for all patients.

Methodology

This retrospective study included all patients who underwent a primary unilateral TKA at a single tertiary arthroplasty centre during a 1 year period. Electronic medical records of 776 patients were reviewed for patient demographics, length of stay and American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade. Blood tests were examined to investigate the incidence of post operative anaemia requiring transfusion, electrolyte abnormalities that required treatment and the incidence of acute kidney injury.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 31 - 31
1 Jul 2022
Lodge C Matar H Berber R Radford P Bloch B
Full Access

Abstract

Aims

Ceramic coatings in total knee arthroplasty have been introduced with the aim of reducing wear and consequently improving implant survivorship. We studied both cobalt-chrome-molybdenum and ceramic-coated components of the same implant design from a single centre to identify if the ceramic coating conferred any benefit at mid-term review.

Patients and Methods

We identified 1641 Columbus TKAs (Aesculap AG, Tüttlingen, Germany) from a prospectively collected arthroplasty database. 983 were traditional CoCrMo and 659 had the AS ceramic coating. Patients were followed up until death or revision of the implant.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 17 - 17
1 Apr 2022
Lodge C Bloch B Matar H Snape S Berber R Manktelow A
Full Access

The aim of this study is to examine the differences in long-term mortality rates between infected and aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) in a single specialist centre over an 18-year period.

Retrospective consecutive study of all patients who underwent rTHA at our tertiary centre between 2003 and 2020 was carried out. Revisions were classified as infected or aseptic. We identified patients’ age, gender, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade (ASA) and body mass index (BMI). The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality at 5 years, 10 years and over the whole study period at 18 years. Death was identified through both local hospital electronic databases and linked data for the National Joint Registry. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate time to death. Where two-stage revision techniques were used of the management of infected cases, these were grouped as a single revision episode for the purpose of analysis.

In total, 1138 consecutive hip revisions were performed on 1063 patients (56 bilateral revisions – aseptic, 10 Excision arthroplasties – infection, 9 – Debridement, Antibiotics, Implant retention (DAIR) with 893 aseptic revisions in 837 patients (78.7%) and 245 infected revisions in 226 patients (21.3%). Average age of the entire study cohort was 71.0 (24–101) with 527 female (49.6%). Average age of the infection and aseptic cohorts was 68.8 and 71.5 respectively. Revisions for infection had higher mortality rates throughout the three time points of analysis. Patients’ survivorship for infected vs aseptic revisions was; 77.8% vs 87.7% at 5 years, 62.8% vs 76.5% at 10 years and 62.4% vs 72.0% at 18 years. The unadjusted 10-year risk ratio of death after infected revision was 1.58 (95% confidence interval 1.28–1.95) compared to aseptic revisions.

rTHA performed for infection is associated with significantly higher long-term mortality at all time points compared to aseptic revision surgery.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 152 - 152
1 Jan 2016
Liu B Lodge C Budgen A
Full Access

Background

Operative fixation of acute tendo-achilles ruptures remains controversial. Standard surgical exposure is associated with and increased risk of wound breakdown and infections. The mini-open technique was developed to minimise these risks and provide anatomical reduction/apposition of the tendon rupture.

Methods

We present a retrospective case series of 27 patients who were treated operatively for acute Achilles tendon rupture in the hands of 1 surgeon, between 4–6 years post operatively, using Achillon instrumentation. Post operatively they were treated with an air cast boot and 3 wedges, bringing the foot into neutral by 6 weeks followed by a rehabilitation programme. The patients were contacted via telephone and consent was obtained. The complications, Leppilahti score and ATRS score were then calculated.