This review compares the outcomes and complication rates of three surgical strategies used for the management of symptomatic os acromiale. The purpose of this study was to help guide best practice recommendations.

A systematic review of nine prospective studies, seven retrospective studies, and three case studies published across ten countries between 1993 and 2018 was performed. Adult patients (i.e., ≥ 18 years of age) with a symptomatic os acromiale that failed nonoperative management were included in this review. Surgical techniques utilized within the included studies include excision, acromioplasty, and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The primary outcomes of interest included patient satisfaction and return to activity. Range of motion and several standardized outcome measurement tools were also included in the final analysis.

Patient satisfaction was highest in the excision and ORIF groups, with 92% and 82% of patients reporting good to excellent postoperative results, respectively, compared to 63% in the acromioplasty group. All three patient groups experienced improved postoperative objective scores (i.e., patient-reported outcome scores and active range of motion). The excision group experienced a complication rate of 1%, while the acromioplasty group experienced a complication rate of 11% and the ORIF group a rate of 67%.

This study reports on the largest sample of patients who have undergone surgical treatment for a symptomatic os acromiale. We have demonstrated that excision of the os with repair of the deltoid resulted in the best clinical outcomes with the least complications. In healthy adult patients with a large os fragment and a normal rotator cuff, surgical fixation may provide increased preservation of deltoid function while offering good patient satisfaction. Such patients should be aware that they are at increased risk of requiring a second procedure due to symptomatic hardware following ORIF.

Rotator cuff disease encompasses a spectrum from partial to full thickness tears. Despite being 2–3 times more common than full–thickness tears, effective non-operative treatment for partial thickness tears has remained elusive. Platelet enriched plasma (PRP) has been proposed to enhance rotator cuff healing by enhancing the natural healing cascade. However, its utility in rotator cuff disease remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the patient reported outcomes between PRP and corticosteroid injection in patients with symptomatic partial thickness tears.

This double blind randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with symptomatic, partial thickness rotator cuff tears or rotator cuff tendinopathy proven on ultrasound or MRI. Patients were randomized to either corticosteroid or PRP ultrasound-guided injection of the affected shoulder. Patients completed patient reported outcomes at 6 weeks and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores. Secondary outcomes included the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and failure of non-operative management as determined by consent for surgery or progression to operative intervention.

Ninety-nine patients were enrolled in the study with equal demographics between the two groups. Taking into account pre-injection scores, patients with PRP injections demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in VAS scores compared to patients receiving corticosteroid injections at 12 weeks (p=0.045) but not at 6 weeks (p=0.704). There was no difference in other outcome measures or progression of the two groups to surgical intervention.

The use of PRP in the management of partial thickness rotator cuff tears demonstrates significant improvement of pain scores at 12 week follow up compared to corticosteroid injections. However, this did not affect the rate of progression to surgical intervention. Continued study is required to determine the utility of PRP in this patient population.

Purpose of the study: Insufficient patellar bone can raise problems for revision total knee arthroplasty and for certain cases of lateral patellofemoral degeneration. Several options are proposed: non-resurfacing, resurfacing on an asymmetrical bone cut, patellar thinning possibly leading to fracture, or patellar bone graft to obtain a regular thick bone.

Material and methods: We report a series of 26 patellar reconstructions among 19 primary osteoarthritis cases with lateral patellofemoral degeneration and five revisions. The patellar reconstruction involved the entire patellar surface in five cases and the lateral facet in 19. For only two cases, a bank graft was used. For the others, the graft was shaped from the tibial resection. Stabilisation used screw fixation in only one case. For the others, two cemented patellar anchor buttons were used to stabilise the graft. All patients were reviewed clinically and radiographically at minimum 12 months. Mean follow-up was 54 months (12–95).

Results: Patellar thickness measured during surgery was improved from 18.1 mm (10–25) to 24.5 mm (21–31). The DMS and function scores improved respectively: 45.5 and 40.7 preoperatively and 89.1 and 72.8 at last follow-up. Seven patients were noted C in the Charnley classification at last follow-up and five used one or two crutches for walking. Twelve patients used the hand rail when climbing stairs and seven needed to use their hands to get up from a chair. All grafts except the allograft fused and all patellar buttons remained stable. There was one lucency at last follow-up. Among the 13 patella exhibited a shift preoperatively, only one remained at last follow-up. There were no subluxations at last follow-up (15 preoperatively).

Discussion: This work shows the pertinence of patellar bone grafts to restore bone stock and avoid complications related to resurfacing asymmetry: pain and patellar shift. Fixation by osteosynthesis does not appear to be necessary. Autographs can be used without risk. Allografts still have to prove their efficacy in this indication.

Introduction and Aims: The anterior approach to dealing with complex spinal deformities around the cervical thoracic junction presents a surgical challenge. With the help of a cardiothoracic surgeon, a sternal splitting technique was utilised in five paediatric patients to resolve this difficulty and gain access to spinal deformities around the cervical thoracic junction.

Method: A longitudinal incision is made parallel to the sternocleido muscle and extended across the sternum for a median sternotomy. The sternocleido muscles are retracted to the lateral aspect of the incision. The carotid and jugular vein are dissected out. To continue with the dissection and exposure of the upper thoracic spine, a full sternotomy is done. The sternum is opened. The dissection of the right carotid is extended over the innominate artery, including the bifurcation of the right subclavian artery. The jugular vein is dissected out coming down to the superior vena cava. The innominate vein is isolated. The lower end of the anterior scalenus muscle is divided up.

Results: This technique was employed in five paediatric patients, aged three to 15 years, at the authors’ institution. Diagnoses included Klippel-Feil Syndrome, Proteus Syndrome, Larsen Syndrome and, Neurofibromatosis (two patients). All patients had severe cervical thoracic kyphosis requiring surgical instrumentation. This technique resulted in a range of access from C5 to T6 being granted. In one patient, a separate thorocotemy was performed in order to gain access to the lower thoracic spine.

Conclusion: This approach was invaluable in gaining access to the cervical thoracic junction to address complex spinal deformities. Access to the lower cervical and the upper thoracic spine is granted. No significant complications occurred. The aid of a cardiothoracic surgeon is advised.

Purpose: We were confronted with four cases of major loosening with migration of the metal-backed implant and acetabular osteolysis at seven years follow-up. We thus conducted a retrospective clinical and radiological analysis of our 192 prosthesis of this type implanted in 1993.

Material and methods: The clinical results were analysed using the Postel Merle d’Aubigné score (PMA). Radiographic wear was measured on the AP views without loading according to the Charnley method. Osteolysis was determined on the AP view using the De Lee and Charnley criteria. Certain files also had a scintigraphy or a CT scan performed to search for bone lysis. Osteolysis and femoral loosening were studied on the AP and lateral views. In agreement with the literature, wear of 0.1 mm/year was considered normal for these cemented prostheses and 0.15 mm/year for metal-backed cups.

Results: For the femoral component, there were two cases of loosening with massive osteolysis with a sanded titanium inserted with cement. None of the patients, with a cemented or non-cemented prosthesis underwent revision for pain. At the acetabular level, there were no failures for primary instability. Wear was normal (mean 0.08) in 89 cases (46.5%) and excessive (mean 0.26) in 103 cases (53.5%). Significant factors for wear were: patient age, gender, and level of activity. Factors without a significant influence were: size of the acetabular cup, type of bead, patient overweight. Osteolysis was the consequence of abnormal wear since in 42% of the abnormal wear cases showed osteolysis compared with 20% when wear was less than 0.15. The same observations were made for the clinical impact as 15.5% of the worn cups were symptomatic (PMA < 4) and 18 of the 103 patients (17.5%) underwent or will undergo revision.

Conclusion: Metal-backed cups present excessive wear at mid term causing early failure by osteolysis and implant migration. There are two options: remove the polyethylene sing a new metal-on-metal combination or a ceramic-ceramic combination, or returning to the metal-polyethylene combination with a cemented cup.