Fifth metatarsal fractures in sport are known to be associated with acceleration and cross cutting movements when running. It is also established that playing surface has an impact on the ground reaction forces through the foot, increasing the strain through the fifth metatarsal. But what impact does boot design have on these forces? Current thought is that boots that utilise a blade stud design resist sideways slipping of the planted foot more than boots with a rounded stud. This study aims to compare ground reaction forces through the fifth metatarsal in 2 two different designs of rugby boot to assess what impact stud design might have. The forces across the foot were measured using Tekscan in-shoe pressure plates in 24 rugby players. Each player was asked to complete an agility course to measure acceleration, cutting and cross-cutting in the two different designs of rugby boot, reproducing true playing conditions. The boots used were the Canterbury Phoenix Club 8 Stud boot and the Canterbury Speed Club Blade boot. The trial was conducted on an 4G artificial pitch at the Cardiff Arms Park rugby ground. Ethical approval was obtained from Bath University and a research grant was provided by British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. The blade boot had significantly higher contact pressures than the stud boot on the fifth metatarsal in the combined movements (17.909 ± 10.442 N/cm2 Blade Vs 16.888 ± 9.992 N/cm2 Boot; P < .0125; n= 864 steps in each boot group). The blade boot also produced higher pressure during cross-cutting (32.331 ± 13.568 N/cm2 Vs 27.651 ± 15.194 N/cm2 p < 0.007). Pressures were also higher in both acceleration and cutting, although not significantly so. These results will guide clinicians advising athletes in shoe design, especially those predisposed to or rehabilitating from a fifth metatarsal fracture.

Patients who present with a fractured neck of femur (NOF) have a significant rate of morbidity and mortality. In 2011, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published clinical guidelines in order to improve these rates. Within this guideline NICE state that surgery should be performed on all NOF fractures within 36 hours. Within ABMU Health board the 1000 Lives Campaign goes a step further and aims to operate on 90% of patients within 24 hours.

This study investigates the effect of an additional NOF theatre list on compliance to these national guidelines.

This retrospective study was performed between October-December 2013 and December-February 2015. The first period of data collection represents a daily trauma list whilst the second period allowed an additional NOF theatre list. Data was collected using the National Hip Fracture Database and the Trauma Theatre List.

The number of patients meeting the national guidelines increased with the presence of an additional theatre list (75.19% v 60%). This represents a reduction to the average time to theatre of 4 hours and 30 minutes (29:47 v 34:17). The additional theatre list improved prioritisation of patients with NOF fractures on the list (29.46% v 13.33% listed first on list) and reduced the rate of cancellations (19.38 v 29.17%).

During this study Morriston Hospital did not meet national guidelines, however an additional theatre list did significantly improve average time to theatre. This study highlights the significant impact a dedicated NOF fracture theatre list can have.

Winner – Best Paper Award